Application of Artificial Intelligence to the Management of Urological Cancer

Journal of Urology

Volumn 178, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1150-1156

  Abbod, Maysam F ^a   Catto, James W F ^b   Linkens, Derek A ^b   Hamdy, Freddie C ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bladder; bladder neoplasms; neural networks (computer); prostate; prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDLINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; URINARY TRACT CANCER;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EXPERT SYSTEMS; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROGNOSIS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURVIVAL RATE; TESTICULAR NEOPLASMS; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS; UROGENITAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 34548389305     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.122     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Schwarzer G., and Schumacher M. Artificial neural networks for diagnosis and prognosis in prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol 20 (2002) 89
2. Sargent D.J. Comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches: results from medical data sets. Cancer 91 (2001) 1636
3. Schwarzer G., Vach W., and Schumacher M. On the misuses of artificial neural networks for prognostic and diagnostic classification in oncology. Stat Med 19 (2000) 541
4. Winkler R.L. An Introduction to Bayesian Inference and Decision (1972), Holt and, Rinehart and Winston, Toronto
5. Onisko A., Druzdzel M.J., and Wasyluk H. A Bayesian network model for diagnosis of liver disorders. Presented at Eleventh Conference on Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw, Poland, December 2-4 (1999)
6. Jackson P. Forthcoming. Introduction to Expert Systems. 3rd ed. (1986), Longman Addison Wesley, London
7. Anagnostou T., Remzi M., Lykourinas M., and Djavan B. Artificial neural networks for decision-making in urologic oncology. Eur Urol 43 (2003) 596
8. Catto J.W.F., Linkens D.A., Abbod M.F., Chen M., Burton J.L., Feeley K.M., et al. Artificial intelligence in predicting bladder cancer outcome: a comparison of neuro-fuzzy modeling and artificial neural networks. Clin Cancer Res 9 (2003) 4172
9. Chen M., and Linkens D.A. A systematic neurofuzzy modelling framework with application to material property prediction. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 31 (2001) 781
10. Catto J.W.F., Abbod M.F., Linkens D.A., and Hamdy F.C. Neuro-fuzzy modeling: an accurate and interpretable method for predicting bladder cancer progression. J Urol 175 (2006) 474
11. Djavan B., Remzi M., Zlotta A., Seitz C., Snow P., and Marberger M. Novel artificial neural network for early detection of prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 20 (2002) 921
12. Tewari A., and Narayan P. Novel staging tool for localized prostate cancer: a pilot study using genetic adaptive neural networks. J Urol 160 (1998) 430
13. Tewari A., Issa M., El-Galley R., Stricker H., Peabody J., Pow-Sang J., et al. Genetic adaptive neural network to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. Mol Urol 5 (2001) 163
14. Babaian R.J., Fritsche H., Ayala A., Bhadkamkar V., Johnston D.A., Naccarato W., et al. Performance of a neural network in detecting prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen reflex range of 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL. Urology 56 (2000) 1000
15. Naguib R.N., Robinson M.C., Neal D.E., and Hamdy F.C. Neural network analysis of combined conventional and experimental prognostic markers in prostate cancer: a pilot study. Br J Cancer 78 (1998) 246
16. Khan J., Wei J.S., Ringner M., Saal L.H., Ladanyi M., Westermann F., et al. Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nat Med 7 (2001) 673
17. Remzi M., Anagnostou T., Ravery V., Zlotta A., Stephan C., Marberger M., et al. An artificial neural network to predict the outcome of repeat prostate biopsies. Urology 62 (2003) 456
18. Babaian R.J., Fritsche H.A., Zhang Z., Zhang K.H., Madyastha K.R., and Barnhill S.D. Evaluation of ProstAsure index in the detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary report. Urology 51 (1998) 132
19. Saritas I., Allahverdi N., and Sert I.U.P. A fuzzy expert system design for diagnosis of prostate cancer. Presented at International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (e-Learning), Bulgaria, June 19-20 (2003)
20. Montironi R., Bartels P.H., Thompson D., Scarpelli M., and Hamilton P.W. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Performance of Bayesian belief network for diagnosis and grading. J Pathol 177 (1995) 153
21. Batuello J.T., Gamito E.J., Crawford E.D., Han M., Partin A.W., McLeod D.G., et al. Artificial neural network model for the assessment of lymph node spread in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 57 (2001) 481
22. Han M., Snow P.B., Brandt J.M., and Partin A.W. Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of pathologic stage in prostate carcinoma. Cancer 91 (2001) 1661
23. Horner J.K. A Bayesian-network sensitivity analysis of the Partin-table prostate cancer diagnostic protocol to single-bin promotion of Gleason Score. Presented at International Conference on Mathematics and Engineering Techniques in Medicine and Biological Sciences, Las Vegas, Nevada, June 23-26 (2003)
24. Mattfeldt T., Gottfried H., Wolter H., Schmidt V., Kestler H.A., and Mayer J. Classification of prostatic carcinoma with artificial neural networks using comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative stereological data. Pathol Res Pract 199 (2003) 773
25. Jung J.K., Young H.K., and Yonggwan W. Proteomic pattern classification using bio-markers for prostate cancer diagnosis. Presented at Computational and Information Science: First International Symposium, Shanghai, People's Republic of China, December 16-18 (2004)
26. Kattan M.W. Comparison of Cox regression with other methods for determining prediction models and nomograms. J Urol, part 2 170 (2003) S6
27. Gulliford S.L., Webb S., Rowbottom C.G., Corne D.W., and Dearnaley D.P. Use of artificial neural networks to predict biological outcomes for patients receiving radical radiotherapy of the prostate. Radiother Oncol 71 (2004) 3
28. Han M., Snow P.B., Epstein J.I., Chan T.Y., Jones K.A., Walsh P.C., et al. A neural network predicts progression for men with Gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 tumors after radical prostatectomy. Urology 56 (2000) 994
29. Poulakis V., Witzsch U., de Vries R., Emmerlich V., Meves M., Altmannsberger H.M., et al. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Urology 64 (2004) 1165
30. Mazzucchelli R., Santinelli A., Colanzi P., Streccioni M., Lopez-Beltran A., Scarpelli M., et al. Urothelial papillary lesions. Development of a Bayesian belief network for diagnosis and grading. Anticancer Res 21 (2001) 1157
31. Belacel N., and Boulassel M.R. Multicriteria fuzzy assignment method: a useful tool to assist medical diagnosis. Artif Intell Med 21 (2001) 201
32. Spyridonos P., Cavouras D., Ravazoula P., and Nikiforidis G. Neural network-based segmentation and classification system for automated grading of histologic sections of bladder carcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 24 (2002) 317
33. Tasoulis D.K., Spyridonos P., Pavlidis N.G., Cavouras D., Ravazoula P., Nikiforidis G., et al. Urinary bladder tumor grade diagnosis using on-line trained neural networks. Presented at Seventh International Conference of Knowledge Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, Oxford, United Kingdom, September 3-5 (2003)
34. Pantazopoulos D., Karakitsos P., Iokim-Liossi A., Pouliakis A., Botsoli-Stergiou E., and Dimopoulos C. Back propagation neural network in the discrimination of benign from malignant lower urinary tract lesions. J Urol 159 (1998) 1619
35. Parekattil S.J., Fisher H.A., and Kogan B.A. Neural network using combined urine nuclear matrix protein-22, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and urinary intercellular adhesion molecule-1 to detect bladder cancer. J Urol 169 (2003) 917
36. Ji W., Naguib R.N., and Ghoneim M.A. Neural network-based assessment of prognostic markers and outcome prediction in bilharziasis-associated bladder cancer. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 7 (2003) 218
37. Qureshi K.N., Naguib R.N., Hamdy F.C., Neal D.E., and Mellon J.K. Neural network analysis of clinicopathological and molecular markers in bladder cancer. J Urol 163 (2000) 630
38. Moul J.W., Snow P.B., Fernandez E.B., Maher P.D., and Sesterhenn I.A. Neural network analysis of quantitative histological factors to predict pathological stage in clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular cancer. J Urol 153 (1995) 1674
39. Feleppa E.J., Ennis R.D., Schiff P.B., Wuu C.S., Kalisz A., Ketterling J., et al. Ultrasonic spectrum-analysis and neural-network classification as a basis for ultrasonic imaging to target brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 1 (2002) 48
40. Maclin P.S., Dempsey J., Brooks J., and Rand J. Using neural networks to diagnose cancer. J Med Syst 15 (1991) 11
41. Prater J.S., and Richard W.D. Segmenting ultrasound images of the prostate using neural networks. Ultrason Imaging 14 (1992) 159
42. Scheipers U., Ermert H., Sommerfeld H.J., Garcia-Schurmann M., Senge T., and Philippou S. Ultrasonic multifeature tissue characterization for prostate diagnostics. Ultrasound Med Biol 29 (2003) 1137
43. Feleppa E.J., Porter C.R., Ketterling J., Lee P., Dasgupta S., Urban S., et al. Recent developments in tissue-type imaging (TTI) for planning and monitoring treatment of prostate cancer. Ultrason Imaging 26 (2004) 163
44. Porter C.R., and Crawford E.D. Combining artificial neural networks and transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 17 (2003) 1395
45. Huynen A.L., Giesen R.J., de la Rosette J.J., Aarnink R.G., Debruyne F.M., and Wijkstra H. Analysis of ultrasonographic prostate images for the detection of prostatic carcinoma: the automated urologic diagnostic expert system. Ultrasound Med Biol 20 (1994) 1
46. Nanayakkara N.D., and Samarabandu J.K. Automatic prostate boundary detection in ultrasound images using multiresolution deformable models and fuzzy logic. Presented at Fourth International Conference of SPIE, International Society for Optical Engineering, Kiev, Ukraine, June 26-28 (2003)
47. Scheipers U., Ermert H., Sommerfeld H.J., Garcia-Schurmann M., Kuhne K., Senge T., et al. Ultrasonic tissue characterization for prostate diagnostics: spectral parameters vs. texture parameters. Biomed Tech (Berl) 48 (2003) 122
48. Lorenz A., Pesavento A., Scheipers U., Ermert H., Garcia Schurmann M., Sommerfeld H.J., et al. Ultrasonic tissue characterization assessment of prostate tissue malignancy in vivo using a conventional classifier based tissue classification approach and elastographic imaging. Presented at IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, San Juan, Puerto Rico, October 22-25 (2000)
49. Wells D.M., and Niederer J. A medical expert system approach using artificial neural networks for standardized treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41 (1998) 173
50. Meyer J., Phillips M.H., Cho P.S., Kalet I., and Doctor J.N. Application of influence diagrams to prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan selection. Phys Med Biol 49 (2004) 1637