Managing the exchange of information in product development

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 184, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 311-326

  Yassine, Ali A ^a   Sreenivas, Ramavarapu S ^a   Zhu, Jian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Concurrent engineering; Design iteration; Overlapping; Product development

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

DECISION RULES; DESIGN ITERATION; OVERLAPPING;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 34548383813     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.042     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Barraza G., Back E., and Mata F. Probabilistic monitoring of project performance using SS curves. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 4 (2000) 142-148
2. Bsharah, R., Deploying Advanced PDM Capabilities at Ford Motor Company. In: Information Technology for Engineering and Manufacturing (ITEM 2000) conference, June12-13, 2000. .
3. Clark K.B., and Fujimoto T. Lead time in automobile product development explaining the Japanese advantage. Engineering and Technology Management 6 (1989) 25-58
4. Clark K.B., and Fujimoto T. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
5. Cohen M.A., Eliashberg J., and Ho T. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Science 42 2 (1996) 173-186
6. Cohen M., Eliashberg J., and Ho T.-H. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Science 42 2 (1996) 173-186
7. Crow, K., 2002. Product Data Management/Product Information Management. (accessed December 2004).
8. Ford, D.N., Sterman, J.D., 2002. Iteration Management for Reduced Cycle Time in Concurrent Development Projects, Working paper.
9. Ha A.Y., and Porteus E.L. Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Science 41 (1995) 1431-1447
10. Hoedemaker G.M., Blackburn J.D., and Van Wassenhove L.N. Limits to concurrency. Decision Sciences 30 (1999) 1-18
11. Joglekar N.R., Yassine A.A., Eppinger S.D., and Whitney D.E. Performance of coupled product development activities with a deadline. Management Science 47 (2001) 1605-1620
12. Karlsson C., and Ahlstrom P. Technological level and product development cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (1999) 352-362
13. Krishnan V., and Bhattacharya S. Technology selection and commitment in new product development: The role of uncertainty and design flexibility. Management Science 48 (2002) 313-327
14. Krishnan V., and Ulrich K.T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science 47 (2001) 1-21
15. Krishnan V., Eppinger S.D., and Whitney D.E. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Science 43 (1997) 437-451
16. Krishnan V., Eppinger S.D., and Whitney D.E. Simplifying iterations in cross-functional design decision making. Journal of Mechanical Design 119 (1997) 485-493
17. Liu D., and Xu X. A review of web-based product data management systems. Computers in Industry 44 (2001) 251-262
18. Loch C.H., and Terwiesch C. Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering. Management Science 44 (1998) 1032-1048
19. McDaniel, C.D., 1996. A linear systems framework for analyzing the automotive appearance design process. Master's Thesis (Mgmt./EE), MIT, Cambridge, MA.
20. O'Donnell F., and Duffy A. Modeling design development performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 22 11 (2002) 1198-1221
21. Roemer T.A., Ahmadi R., and Wang R.H. Time-cost trade-offs in overlapped product development. Operations Research 48 (2000) 858-867
22. Rosenthal S.R. Effective Product Design and Development (1992), Irwin
23. Smith P.G., and Reinertsen D.G. Developing Products in Half the Time (1998), Van Nostrand Reinhold
24. Takeuchi H., and Nonaka I. The new product development game. Harvard Business Review January-February (1986) 137-146
25. Thomke S., and Bell D. Sequential testing in product development. Management Science 47 2 (2001) 308-323
26. Thomke S., and Fujimoto T. The effect of front-loading problem-solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management March (2000)
27. Ullman D. Robust decision making for engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design 12 1 (2001)
28. Vedapudi, M., 2000. Requirements for a product information management (PIM) infrastructure to support partner programs, System Design and Management Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, January.
29. Ward A., Liker J.K., Cristiano J.J., and Sobek D.K. The second toyota paradox - how delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Review 36 (1995) 43-61
30. Wheelwright S.C., and Clark K.B. Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality (1992), Free Press, New York
31. Yassine A., and Braha D. Four complex problems in concurrent engineering and the design structure matrix method. Concurrent Engineering Research & Applications 11 3 (2003)
32. Yassine A., Chelst K., and Falkenburg D. A decision analytic framework for evaluating concurrent engineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 46 2 (1999) 144-157
33. Yassine A.A., Joglekar N.R., Braha D., Eppinger S.D., and Whitney D.E. Information hiding in product development: the design churn effect. Research in Engineering Design 14 3 (2003)
34. Zirger B., and Maidique M. A model of new product development: an empirical test. Management Science 36 7 (1990) 867-883