Effect of variability in anatomical landmark location on knee kinematic description

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1221-1230

  Morton, Nicholas A ^a   Maletsky, Lorin P ^a   Pal, Saikat ^b   Laz, Peter J ^b  

^a University of Kansas   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

Anatomical landmarks; Kinematic variability; Knee kinematics; Probabilistic methods

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KINEMATICS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; SIMULATION; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TIBIA;

BIOMECHANICS; GAIT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 34548382706     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20396     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Blunn GW, Walker PS, Joshi A, et al. 1991. The dominance of cyclic sliding in producing wear in total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:253-260.
2. Katchburian MV, Bull AM, Shih YF, et al. 2003. Measurement of patellar tracking: assessment and analysis of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res 412:241-259.
3. Kawanabe K, Clarke IC, Tamura J, et al. 2001. Effects of A-P translation and rotation on the wear of UHMWPE in a total knee joint simulator. J Biomed Mater Res 54:400-406.
4. Kawano T, Miura H, Nagamine R, et al. 2002. Factors affecting patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:942-947.
5. Walker PS, Haider H. 2003. Characterizing the motion of total knee replacements in laboratory tests. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:54-68.
6. Walker PS, Sathasivam S., 2000. Design forms of total knee replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 214:101-119.
7. Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, Anouchi YS. 1992. The effect of patellar button placement and femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 275:211-219.
8. Wu G, Cavanagh PR. 1995. ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J Biomech 28:1257-1261.
9. Mannel H, Marin F, Claes L, et al. 2004. Establishment of a knee-joint coordinate system from helical axes analysis - a kinematic approach without anatomical referencing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:1341-1347.
10. Ramsey DK, Wretenberg PF. 1999. Biomechanics of the knee: methodological considerations in the in vivo kinematic analysis of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 14:595-611.
11. Cheze L. 2000. Comparison of different calculations of three-dimensional joint kinematics from video-based system data. J Biomech 33:1695-1699.
12. Woltring HJ, Huiskes R, de Lange A, et al. 1985. Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics. J Biomech 18:379-389.
13. Koh TJ, Grabiner MD, De Swart RJ. 1992. In vivo tracking of the human patella. J Biomech 25:637-643.
14. Lafortune MA, Cavanagh PR, Sommer HJ III, et al. 1992. Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. J Biomech 25:347-357.
15. van Kampen A, Huiskes R. 1990. The three-dimensional tracking pattern of the human patella. J Orthop Res 8:372-382.
16. Bull AM, Amis AA. 1998. Knee joint motion: description and measurement. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 212:357-372.
17. Grood ES, Suntay WJ. 1983. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136-144.
18. Pennock GR, Clark KJ. 1990. An anatomy-based coordinate system for the description of the kinematic displacements in the human knee. J Biomech 23:1209-1218.
19. Bull AM, Katchburian MV, Shih YF, et al. 2002. Standardisation of the description of patellofemoral motion and comparison between different techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:184-193.
20. Lerner AL, Tamez-Pena JG, Houck JR, et al. 2003. The use of sequential MR image sets for determining tibiofemoral motion: reliability of coordinate systems and accuracy of motion tracking algorithm. J Biomech Eng 125:246-253.
21. von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Siebert M, Bringmann C, et al. 2004. A new in vivo technique for determination of 3D kinematics and contact areas of the patello-femoral and tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 37:927-934.
22. Fellows RA, Hill NA, Macintyre NJ, et al. 2005. Repeatability of a novel technique for in vivo measurement of three-dimensional patellar tracking using magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:145-153.
23. Dennis D, Komistek R, Scuderi G, et al. 2001. In vivo three-dimensional determination of kinematics for subjects with a normal knee or a unicompartmental. or total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 83-A (Suppl 2 Pt 2):104-115.
24. Li G, Wuerz TH, DeFrate LE. 2004. Feasibility of using orthogonal fluoroscopic images to measure in vivo joint kinematics. J Biomech Eng 126:314-318.
25. Besier TF, Sturnieks DL, Alderson JA, et al. 2003. Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis. J Biomech 36:1159-1168.
26. della Croce U, Cappozzo A, Kerrigan DC. 1999. Pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark calibration precision and its propagation to bone geometry and joint angles. Med Biol Eng Comput 37:155-161.
27. Browne M, Langley RS, Gregson PJ. 1999. Reliability theory for load bearing biomedical implants. Biomaterials 20:1285-1292.
28. Dar FH, Meakin JR, Aspden RM., 2002. Statistical methods in finite element analysis. J Biomech 35:1155-1161.
29. Nicolella DP, Thacker BH, Katoozian H, et al. 2006. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis. J Biomech 39:1265-1278.
30. Laz PJ, Pal S, Halloran JP, et al. 2006. Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics. J Biomech 39:2303-2310.
31. Maletsky LP, Hillberry BM., 2005. Simulating dynamic activities using a five-axis knee simulator. J Biomech Eng 127:123-133.
32. Hefzy MS, Jackson WT, Saddemi SR, et al. 1992. Effects of tibial rotations on patellar tracking and patello-femoral contact areas. J Biomed Eng 14:329-343.
33. Guess TM, Maletsky LP. 2005. Computational modelling of a total knee prosthetic loaded in a dynamic knee simulator. Med Eng Phys 27:357-367.
34. Haldar A, Mahadevan S. 2000. Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. New York/Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
35. McEwen HM, Barnett PI, Bell CJ, et al. 2005. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech 38:357-365.
36. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Walker SA, et al. 2001. Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83:33-39.
37. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, et al. 2001. Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:706-714.
38. Piazza SJ, Cavanagh PR. 2000. Measurement of the screw-home motion of the knee is sensitive to errors in axis alignment. J Biomech 33:1029-1034.
39. Blankevoort L, Huiskes R, de Lange A. 1988. The envelope of passive knee joint motion. J Biomech 21:705-720.
40. Most E, Axe J, Rubash H, et al. 2004. Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. J Biomech 37-.1743-1748.
41. Della Croce U, Camomilla V, Leardini A, et al. 2003. Femoral anatomical frame: assessment of various definitions. Med Eng Phys 25:425-431.