Utilitarians are not always fair and the fair are not always utilitarian: Distinct motives for cooperation

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1931-1955

  Markóczy, Lívia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548330100     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00244.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ambrose, M. L. (2002). Contemporary justice research: A new look at familiar questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 803 812.
2. Baron, J. (2000). Judgment misguided: Intuition and error in public decision making. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
3. Baron, J. (2001). Confusion of group interest and self-interest in parochial cooperation on behalf of a group. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 283 296.
4. Batson, C. D. Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107 122.
5. Borenstein, S. (2001, September). The trouble with electricity markets and California's electricity restructuring disaster (Working Paper No. WP-081). Berkeley, CA: University of California Energy Institute.
6. Cohen-Charash, Y. Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278 321.
7. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H. Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425 445.
8. Croson, R. (1998). Theories of commitment, altruism and reciprocity: Evidence from linear public goods games. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, University Park, PA.
9. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J. Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1 11.
10. Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M., Simmons, R. T. van de Kragt, A. J. C. (1986). Organizing groups for collective action. American Political Science Review, 80, 1171 1185.
11. de Vries, S. Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Constrained egoism and resource management under uncertainty. In W. B. G. Liebrand D. M. Messick (Eds Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 81 99). Elmsford, NY : Pergamon.
12. Earley, C. P. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 89 117.
13. Elster, J. (1989). The cement of society: A study of social order. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
14. Goldberg, J., Markóczy, L. Zahn, L. (2005). Symmetry and the illusion of control as bases for cooperative behavior. Rationality and Society, 17, 243 270.
15. Hoffman, M. L. (1981). Is altruism part of human nature? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 121 137.
16. Johnson, A. C., Johnson, M. B. Buse, R. C. (1987). Econometrics: Basic and applied. New York : Macmillan.
17. Kerr, N. L. (1986). Motivational choices in task groups: A paradigm for social dilemma research. In H. A. M. Wilke, D. M. Messick C. G. Rutte (Eds Experimental social dilemmas (Vol. 3, pp. 1 27). Frankfurt, Germany : Peter Lang.
18. Kerr, N. L. (1992). Efficacy as a causal and moderating variable in social dilemmas. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick H. A. M. Wilke (Eds Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 59 80). Oxford, UK : Pergamon Press.
19. Kerr, N. L. Harris, S. E. (1996). Why do cooperators cooperate? Efficacy as a moderator of social motives effects. In W. Liebrand D. Messick (Eds Frontiers in social dilemmas research (pp. 101 115). Berlin, Germany : Springer.
20. Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B. Hanna, B. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action. The decision to trust as a social decision. In R. M. Kramer T. R. Tyler (Eds Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 357 389). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
21. Kramer, R. M., McClintock, C. G. Messick, D. M. (1986). Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. Journal of Personality, 54, 576 592.
22. Kuhlman, D. M., Brown, C. Teta, P. (1992). Judgments of cooperation and defection in social dilemmas: The moderating role of judge's social orientation. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick H. A. M. Wilke (Eds Frontiers in social dilemmas research (pp. 111 132). Oxford, UK : Pergamon.
23. Kuhlman, D. M., Camac, C. R. Cunha, D. A. (1986). Individual differences in social orientation. In H. A. M. Wilke, D. M. Messick C. G. Rutte (Eds Experimental social dilemmas (Vol. 3, pp. 151 176). Frankfurt, Germany : Peter Lang.
24. Lerner, M. (1977). Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1 52.
25. Liebrand, W. B. (1984). The effect of social motives, communication, and group size on behavior in an n-person multi-stage mixed motive game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 239 264.
26. Lind, E. A. Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York : Plenum.
27. Messé, L. A., Dawson, J. E. Lane, I. M. (1973). Equity as a mediator of the effect of reward level on behavior in prisoner's dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 60 65.
28. Messé, L. A. Sivacek, J. M. (1979). Predictions of others' responses in a mixed-motive game: Self-justification or false consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 602 607.
29. Messick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P. Samuelson, C. D. (1985). Why we are fairer than others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 480 500.
30. Messick, D. M. Brewer, M. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: Individual and collective approaches. In L. Wheeler (Ed Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 11 44). Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
31. Messick, D. M. Sentis, K. P. (1979). Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 418 434.
32. Miles, E. W., Hatfield, J. D. Huseman, R. C. (1989). The equity sensitivity construct: Potential implications for worker performance. Journal of Management, 15, 581 588.
33. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
34. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA : Lexington Books.
35. Pepitone, A. (1971). The role of justice in interdependent decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 144 156.
36. Pruitt, D. G. Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363 392.
37. Reeve, H. K. (1998). Acting for the good of others: Kinship and reciprocity with some new twists. In C. B. Crawford D. L. Krebs (Eds Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 43 85). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Schroeder, D. A., Sibicky, M. E. Iris, M. E. (1995). A framework for understanding decisions in social dilemmas. In D. A. Schroeder (Ed Social dilemmas: Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 183 199). Westport, CT : Praeger.
39. Schwartz, S. H. Gottlieb, A. (1980). Bystander anonymity and reaction to emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 418 430.
40. Simon, H. A. (1990). A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. Science, 250, 1665 1668.
41. Simon, H. A. (1993). Altruism and economics. American Economic Review, 83, 156 161.
42. Smith, V., Kehoe, M. Cremer, M. (1995). The private provision of public goods: Altruism and voluntary giving. Journal of Public Economics, 58, 107 126.
43. Unger, L. S. (1991). Altruism as a motivation to volunteer. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12, 71 100.
44. Van Lange, P. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337 349.
45. Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1994). Commuting by car or by public transportation? An interdependence theoretical approach. In U. Schulz, W. Albers U. Mueller (Eds Social dilemmas and cooperation (pp. 291 309). Berlin, Germany : Springer-Verlag.