Ligand versus metal protonation of an iron hydrogenase active site mimic

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 25, 2007, Pages 7075-7084

  Eilers, Gerriet ^a   Schwartz, Lennart ^a   Stein, Matthias ^b   Zampella, Giuseppe ^c   De Gioia, Luca ^c   Ott, Sascha ^a   Lomoth, Reiner ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b EML Research gGmbH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Density functional calculations; Electrochemistry; Enzyme models; Hydride ligands; Tautomerism

Indexed keywords

ENZYME MODELS; HYDRIDE LIGANDS; PHOSPHINE LIGANDS; TAUTOMERISM;

COMPLEXATION; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; LIGANDS; PROTONATION;

ENZYME KINETICS;

FERROUS ION; HYDROGENASE; IRON HYDROGENASE; IRON SULFUR PROTEIN; LIGAND; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MIMICRY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BINDING SITES; CATALYSIS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; FERROUS COMPOUNDS; HYDROGENASE; IRON-SULFUR PROTEINS; LIGANDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR MIMICRY; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; OXIDATION-REDUCTION;

EID: 34548294904     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200700019     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. N. S. Lewis, D. G. Nocera, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 15729-15735.
2. M. Y. Darensbourg, E. J. Lyon, J. J. Smee, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 206-207, 533-561.
3. Y. Nicolet, C. Cavazza, J. C. Fontecilla-Camps, J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002, 91, 1-8.
4. D. J. Evans, C. J. Pickett, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 268-275.
5. M. W. W. Adams, E. I. Stiefel, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 214-220.
6. I. P. Georgakaki, L. M. Thomson, E. J. Lyon, M. B. Hall, M. Y. Darensbourg, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 238-239, 255-266.
7. T. B. Rauchfuss, Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 14-26.
8. L.-C. Song, Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 21-28.
9. In particular, we have recently become interested in the potential application of hydrogenase mimics as molecular catalysts in light-driven hydrogen production, see: S. Ott, M. Kritikos, B. Åkermark, L. Sun, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3407-3410;
10. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3285-3288;
11. S. Ott, M. Borgström, M. Kritikos, R. Lomoth, J. Bergquist, B. Åkermark, L. Hammarström, L. Sun, Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 4683-4692.
12. J. W. Peters, W. N. Lanzilotta, B. J. Lemon, L. C. Seefeldt, Science 1998, 282, 1853-1858.
13. Y. Nicolet, A. L. de Lacey, X. Vernède, V.M. Fernandez, E. C. Hatchikian, J. C. Fontecilla-Camps, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1596-1601.
14. H.-J. Fan, M. B. Hall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3828-3829.
15. Y. Nicolet, C. Piras, P. Legrand, C. E. Hatchikian, J. C. Fontecilla-Camps, Structure 1999, 7, 13-23.
16. Z.-P. Liu, P. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5175-5182.
17. Z.-P. Liu, P. Hu, J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 8177-8180.
18. F. Gloaguen, J. D. Lawrence, T. B. Rauchfuss, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9476-9477.
19. F. Gloaguen, J. D. Lawrence, T. B. Rauchfuss, M. Bénard, M.-M. Rohmer. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 6573-6582.
20. D. Chong, I. P. Georgakaki, R. Mejia-Rodriguez, J. Sanabria-Chinchilla, M. P. Soriaga, M. Y. Darensbourg. Dalton Trans. 2003, 4158-4163.
21. S. J. Borg, T Behrsing, S. P. Best, M. Razavet, X. Liu, C. J. Pickett, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16988-16999.
22. J.-F. Capon, F. Gloaguen, P. Schollhammer, J. Talarmin, J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 566, 241-247.
23. S. Ott, M. Kritikos, B. Åkermark, L. Sun, R. Lomoth, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 1024-1027;
24. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1006-1009.
25. L. Schwartz, G. Eilers, L. Eriksson, A. Gogoli, R. Lomoth, S. Ott. Chem. Commun. 2006, 520-522.
26. Decoupling of the phosphorus nuclei results in a singlet instead of the doublet.
27. X. Zhao, I. P. Georgakaki, M. L. Miller, R. Mejia-Rodriguez, C.-Y. Chiang, M. Y. Darensbourg, Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3917-3928.
28. 1H NMR spectrum, further signals of considerably smaller amplitude are found at higher frequency for the geometrical isomer.
29. As a result of the various dynamic restrictions, the aliphatic region is rather convoluted and is difficult to interpret.
30. F. Gloaguen, J. D. Lawrence, T. B. Rauchfuss, M. Benard, M.-M. Rohmer, Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 6573-6582.
31. R. Mejia-Rodriguez, D. Chong, J. H. Reibenspies, M. P. Soriaga, M. Y. Darensbourg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12004-12014.
32. J. D. Lawrence, H. Li, T. B. Rauchfuss, M. Bénard, M.-M. Rohmer, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 1818-1821;
33. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1768-1771.
34. H. Li. T Rauchfuss, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 726-727.
35. K. Izutsu, Acid-Base Dissociation Constants in Dipolar Aprotic Solvents, Blackwell, Oxford, 1990.
36. Identical results were obtained with HCl diluted in acetonitrile from either aqueous stock solution (12M) or stock solution in ethanol (1.25M).
37. To rule out any catalytic effect from fluoride contamination the triflic acid was treated with calcium triflate with no detectable effect on the rate of hydride formation.
38. See, for example: R. G. Pearson, Chem. Rev. 1985, 85, 41-49, and references therein.
39. 1 for the Fe-H bond. The kinetic data obtained with different batches of deuteratcd triflic acid were, however, too scattered to be conclusive.
40. S. J. Borg, J. W. Tye, M. B. Hall, S. P. Best, Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 384-394.
41. -1 can be estimated from Saveant's kinetic zone diagram.
42. -1 for a rate-limiting step that is first order in acid.
43. J. M. Savéant, K. B. Su, J. Electroanal. Chem. 1984, 171, 341-349.
44. Given the unfavorable relative positions of the proton on the adt ligand and the bridging hydride, it appears more likely that the hydride is attacked by a bulk proton in a bimolecular reaction rather than by the adt proton in an intramolecular reaction.
45. -1 for a rate-limiting step that is first order in acid.
46. 2+) around -1.6 V that increase with higher acid concentrations. This might indicate that rapid turnover can be triggered at more negative potentials, which generates the doubly reduced hydride complexes that should be more reactive towards protons.
47. G. A. N. Felton, R. S. Glass, D. L. Lichtenberger, D. H. Evans, Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 9181-9184.
48. 2 (p = 1 bar) even with millimolar concentrations of acid.
49. L. Schwartz, J. Ekström, R. Lomoth, S. Ott, Chem. Commun. 2006, 4206-4208.
50. E. Brunner, J. Chem. Eng. Data 1985, 30, 269-273.
51. A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098-3100.
52. J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B J1 - PRB 1986, 33, 8822-8824.
53. M. Bruschi, G. Zampella, R Fantucci, L. De Gioia, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 1620-1640.
54. A. Schaefer, C. Huber, R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5829-5835.
55. A. Klamt, G. Schüürmann, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 799-805.
56. R. Ditchfield, Mol. Phys. 1974, 27, 789-807.
57. K. Wolinski, J. F. Hinton, P. Pulay, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8251-8260.