Quantitative assessment of relationship between sequence similarity and function similarity

BMC Genomics

Volumn 8, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Joshi, Trupti ^a   Xu, Dong ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE FUNCTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC SIMILARITY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DATABASE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENOME; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

PROTEIN;

ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENOME; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 34548130064     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-222     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrade MA Sander C Bioinformatics: from genome data to biological knowledge Current Opinion in Biotechnology 1997, 8:675-683. 10.1016/ S0958-1669(97)80118-8 9425655
2. Koonin EV Bork P Sander C Yeast chromosome III: new gene functions The EMBO Journal 1994, 13:493-503. 394838 8313894
3. Casari G Sander C Valencia A A method to predict functional residues in proteins Nature Structural Biology 1995, 2:171-178. 10.1038/nsb0295-171 7749921
4. Ouzounis C Casari G Sander C Tamames J Valencia A Comparisons of Model Genomes Trends in Biotechnology 1996, 14(B):280-285. 10.1016/ 0167-7799(96)10043-3 8987458
5. Schneider R Casari G Antoine DD Bremer P Schlenkrich M et al. GeneCrunch: Experiences on the SGI POWER CHALLENGE array with bioinformatics applications Supercomputer 1996: Anwendungen, Architekturen, Trends 1997:109-119.
6. Bork P Ouzounis C Sander C From genome sequences to protein function Curr Opin Struct Biol 1994, 4:39-403. 10.1016/S0959-440X(94)90109-0
7. Bork P Koonin EV Predicting functions from protein sequences - where are the bottlenecks? Nat Genet 1998, 18:313-318. 10.1038/ng0498-313 9537411
8. Bork P Dandekar T Diaz-Lazcoz Y Eisenhaber F Huynen M Yuan Y Predicting function: from genes to genomes and back J Mol Biol 1998, 283:707-725. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2144 9790834
9. Tamames J Ouzounis C Casari G Sander C Valencia A EUCLID: Automatic Classification of Proteins in Functional Classes by Their Database Annotations Bioinformatics 1998, 14:542-543. 10.1093/bioinformatics/ 14.6.542 9694995
10. Andrade MA Brown NP et al. "Automated genome sequence analysis and annotation" Bioinformatics 1999, 15:391-412. 10.1093 /bioinformatics/ 15.5.391 10366660
11. Koonin EV "Computational genomics" Curr Biol 2001, 11:R155-158. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00081-1 11267880
12. Brenner SE Errors in genome annotation Trends Genet 1999, 15:132-133. 10.1016/S0168-9525(99)01706-0 10203816
13. Karp PD A protocol for maintaining multidatabase referential integrity Pac Symp Biocomput 1996;438-445. 9390249
14. Karp P What we do not know about sequence analysis and sequence databases Bioinformatics 1998, 14:753-754. 10.1093/bioinformatics/ 14.9.753 10366280
15. Pawlowski K Jaroszewski L Rychlewski L Godzik A Sensitive sequence comparison as protein function predictor Pac Symp Biocomput 2000:42-53. 10902155
16. Rost B Valencia A Pitfalls of protein sequence analysis Curr Opin Biotechnol 1996, 7:457-461. 10.1016/S0958-1669(96)80124-8 8768907
17. Levitt M Gerstein M A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:5913-5920. 34495 9600892 10.1073/pnas.95.11.5913
18. Whisstock JC Lesk AM Prediction of protein function from protein sequence and structure Q Rev Biophys 2003, 36:307-40. 10.1017/ S0033583503003901 15029827
19. Ponting C Issues in predicting protein function from sequence Brief Bioinform 2001, 2:19-29. 10.1093/bib/2.1.19 11465059
20. Shah I Hunter L Predicting enzyme function from sequence: a systematic appraisal Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 1997, 5:276-283. 9322050
21. Devos D Valencia A Practical limits of function prediction Proteins 2000, 41(1):98-107. 10.1002/ 1097-0134(20001001)41:1<98::AID-PROT120>3.0.CO;2-S 10944397
22. Wilson CA Kreychman J Gerstein M Assessing annotation transfer for genomics: quantifying the relations between protein sequence, structure and function through traditional and probabilistic scores J Mol Biol 2000, 297(1):233-49. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3550 10704319
23. Altschul SF Gish W Miller W Myers EW Lipman DJ Basic local alignment search tool J Mol Biol 1990, 215:403-410. 2231712
24. Altschul SF Madden TL Schaffer AA Zhang J Zhang Z Miller W Lipman DJ Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25(17):3389-3402. 146917 9254694 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
25. Thornton JM Orengo CA Todd AE Pearl FM Protein folds, functions and evolution J Mol Biol 1999, 293:333-342. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3054 10529349
26. Thornton JM From genome to function Science 2001, 292:2095-2097. 10.1126/ science.292.5524.2095 11408660
27. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nature Genetics 2000, 25:25-29. 10.1038/ 75556 10802651
28. Joshi T Chen Y Becker JM Alexandrov N Xu D Genome-Scale Gene Function Prediction Using Multiple Sources of High-Throughput Data in Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 2004:322-333.
29. Chen Y Xu D lobal Protein Function Annotation through Mining Genome-Scale Data in Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G Nucleic Acid Research 2004, 32:6414-6424. 10.1093/nar/gkh978
30. Lord PW Stevens RD Brass A Goble CA Investigating semantic similarity measures across the Gene Ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotation Bioinformatics 2003, 19(10):1275-83. 10.1093/bioinformatics/ btg153 12835272
31. Resnik P Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: an information based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language J Artif Intelligence Res 1999, 11:95-130.
32. Guo T Hua S Ji X Sun Z DBSubLoc: database of protein subcellular localization Nucleic Acids Research 2004, 32 Database 2004:D122-D124. 308843 14681374 10.1093/nar/gkh109
33. Hua S Sun Z Support vector machine approach for protein subcellular localization prediction Bioinformatics 2001, 17:721-728. 10.1093/ bioinformatics/17.8.721 11524373
34. Pearson WR Lipman DJ Improved Tools for Biological Sequence Analysis Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85:2444-2448. 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444
35. Pearson WR Rapid and Sensitive Sequence Comparison with FASTP and FASTA Methods in Enzymology 1990, 183:63-98. 2156132
36. Tatusov RL Galperin MY Natale DA Koonin EV The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:33-36. 102395 10592175 10.1093/nar/28.1.33
37. Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/
38. The Gene Ontology http://www.geneontology.org/
39. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) ftp://ftp.arabidopsis.org/
40. National Center for Biotechnology Information(NCBI) ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/
41. Subcellular Localization Prediction of Eukaryotic Proteins (SubLoc) http://www.bioinfo.tsinghua.edu.cn/SubLoc/eu_predict.htm
42. Data and Results website http://digbio.missouri.edu/sfsimilarity