Integrating information and communication technologies in the Turkish primary school system

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 907-916

  Özdemir, Selçuk ^a   Kiliç, Ebru ^b  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; DISTANCE EDUCATION; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; TEACHING;

COMPUTER COORDINATORS; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT);

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 34548089938     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00678.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Akbaba-Altun, S 2004). Information technology classrooms and elementary school principals' roles: Turkish experience. Education and Information Technologies, 9, 3, 225 270.
2. Akbaba-Altun, S 2006). Complexity of integrating computer technologies in education in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 1, 176 187.
3. Alvarez, M. I., Roman, F., Dobles, M. C., Umafia, J., Zunfiga, M., Garcia, J. et al (1998). Computers in schools: a qualitative study of Chile and Costa Rica (Education: special issue). The World Bank.
4. Aston, M. (2002). The development and use of indicators to measure the impact of ICT use in education in the United Kingdom and other European countries. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://www.unescobkk.org/index.php?id= 1201
5. Becta (2002). Primary schools - ICT and standards: a report to the DfES on Becta's analysis of national data from OFSTED and QCA. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/prim_ict_standards.pdf
6. Cuban, L. (2001). Why are most teachers infrequent and restrained users of computers in their classrooms? In J. Woodward L. Cuban (Eds Technology, curriculum and professional development: adapting schools to meet the needs of students with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press.
7. Ely, D. P. (1999). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Educational Technology, 39, 23 27.
8. Fullan, M. Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York : Teachers College Press.
9. Gross, D. Abrami, P. C. (2000). Issues in the integration of technology for learning. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://doe.concordia.ca/cslp/ Downloads/PDF/pddoc-Aug00.PDF
10. Karagöz, I. (2004). The views of primary school administrators and computer formator teachers on the use of IT classrooms. Unpublished master's thesis, AIBÜ Social Sciences Institution, Ankara, Turkey.
11. Kiliç, E. Özdemir, S. (2006). The evaluation of the studies on the distribution and maintenance of the continuity of the information technologies classrooms. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 4, 2, 129 140.
12. Knoster, T. (1991, June). Factors in managing complex change. Presentation at the TASH Conference, Washington, DC, The Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities.
13. Kommers, P. (2000). Information and communication technology (ICT) for education: research and development for the educational integration of technology in Eastern European countries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 3, 104 111.
14. Lai, K. W. Pratt, K. (2004). Information and communication technology (ICT) in secondary schools: the role of the computer coordinator. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 4, 461 475.
15. Lucock, S. Underwood, G. (2001). The role of the ICT coordinator. London : pfp publishing limited. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://www.pfp-publishing. com/pdf/ict-co.pdf
16. McNabb, M. L., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J. Hawkes, M. (1999). Technology connections for school improvement. Planner's handbook. Oak Brook, IL : Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
17. MONE (1993). A notice on the organization and operation of the computer laboratories and the missions of computer coordinator teachers in formal and informal education institutions. MONE Notices Journal, Notice number: 2378.
18. MONE (2001). Notice on using information technologies. MONE Notices Journal, Notice number: 2526.
19. MONE (2002). Regulations on MONE educational services central directorate.
20. MONE (2003a). The program of basic education. Retrieved April 12, 2003, from http://projeler.meb.gov.tr/Projelerimiz/dbpro/tep/tepnedir.htm
21. MONE (2003b). Information technology classes. Retrieved April 12, 2003, from http://projeler.meb.gov.tr/Projelerimiz/dbpro/tep/bt.htm
22. MONE (2003c). Basic education program Phase 1. Connection schemes of ICT classrooms according to their types. Retrieved April 4, 2003, from http://projeler.meb.gov.tr/Projelerimiz/dbpro/tep/bt.htm
23. Schiff, T. W. Solmon, L. C. (1999). California digital high school process evaluation year one report. Milken Family Foundation for the California Department of Education. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://www.mff.org/ pubterms.taf?file=http://www.mff.org/pubs/ME258.pdf
24. Tearle, P. (2003). ICT implementation: what makes a difference? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 3, 567 584.
25. World Bank (1995). Priorities and strategies for education: a World Bank review. Washington, DC : World Bank.
26. World Bank (2006). Turkey basic education project - Phase 2 APL. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://web.worldbank.org/./TURKEYEXTN/0,contentMDK: 20188252∼pagePK:141137∼piPK:141127∼theSitePK:361712,00.htm