On not being noticed: Intellectual disabilities and the nonvocal register

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Finlay, W M L ^a   Antaki, C ^b   Walton, C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MENTAL PATIENT; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESIDENTIAL HOME; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AWARENESS; DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION; GROUP HOMES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MANUAL COMMUNICATION; MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 34548048627     PISSN: 19349556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[227:ONBNID]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alexander, M., & Hegarty, J. R. (2001). Measuring client participation in individual programme planning meetings. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 17-21.
2. Antaki, C. (2001). "D'you like a drink then do you?" Dissembling language and the construction of an impoverished life. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 196-213.
3. Antaki C. (in press). Analysing discourse. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), Handbook of social research methods. London: Sage.
4. Antaki, C., Finlay, W. M. L., Sheridan, E., Jingree, T., & Walton, C. (2006). Producing decisions in service-user groups for people with an intellectual disability: Two contrasting facilitator styles. Mental Retardation, 44, 322-343.
5. Antaki, C., Finlay, W. M. L., & Walton, C. (in press). How proposing an activity to a person with an intellectual disability can imply a limited identity. Discourse and Society.
6. Antaki, C., Young, N., & Finlay, W. M. L. (2002). Shaping clients' answers: Departures from neutrality in care-staff interviews with people with a learning disability. Disability and Society, 17, 435-455.
7. Beamer, S., & Brookes, M. (2001). Making decisions: Best practice and new ideas for supporting people with high support needs to make decisions. London: Values Into Action.
8. Bradshaw, J. (2001). Complexity of staff communication and reported level of understanding skills in adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 233-243
9. Carnaby, S., Lewis, P., Martin, D., Naylor, J., & Stewart, D. (2003). Participation in transition review meetings: A case study of young people with learning disabilities leaving a special school. British Journal of Special Education, 30, 187-193.
10. Dodd, B., & Thompson, L. (2001). Speech disorder in children with Down's syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 308-316.
11. Edge, J. (2001). Who's in control? Decision-making by people with learning difficulties who have high support needs. London: Values Into Action.
12. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
13. Goffman, E (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Goode, D. (1994). A world without words: The social construction of children born deaf-blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press
15. Goodley, D. (2000). Self-advocacy in the lives of people with learning difficulties. Buckingham: Open University Press.
16. Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233-260.
17. Goodwin, C. (2000a). Pointing and the collaborative construction of meaning in aphasia. Proceedings of the seventh annual Symposium About Language and Society (pp 67-76). Austin: University of Texas Press.
18. Goodwin, C. (2000b). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489-1522.
19. Goodwin, C. (2000c). Practices of seeing: Visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp 157-182). London: Sage.
20. Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia. In C. E. Ford, B. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 56-80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Grove, N., Bunning, K., Porter, J., & Olsson, C. (1999). See what I mean: Interpreting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12, 190-203.
23. Hagner, D., Helm, D. T., & Butterworth, J. (1996). "This is your meeting": A qualitative study of person-centered planning. Mental Retardation, 34, 159-171.
24. Harris, J. (2003). Time to make up your mind: Why choosing is difficult. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 3-8.
25. Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Explicating face to face interaction. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (pp. 306-327). London: Sage.
27. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.
28. HM Government. (2005). Valuing people: Making things better (The government's annual report on Learning Disability, 2005). Norwich, UK: Stationary Office.
29. Houghton, J., Bronicki, G. J. B., & Guess, D. (1987). Opportunities to express preferences and make choices among students with severe disabilities in classroom settings. Journal of the Association for People with Severe Handicaps, 12, 18-27.
30. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardised survey interview: The living questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Jenkinson, J. C. (1993). Who shall decide? The relevance of theory and research to decision-making by people with an intellectual disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 8, 361-375
32. Jenkinson, J., Copeland, C., Drivas, B., Scoon, H., & Yap, M. L. (1992). Decision-making by community residents with an intellectual disability. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 18, 1-8.
33. Jingree, T., Finlay, W. M. L., & Antaki, C. (2006). Empowering words, disempowering actions. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 212-226.
34. Kendon, A. (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 109-128.
35. Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the "'hint and guess" - Sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13, 345-363.
36. Lind, M. (2005). Conversation - More than words. A Norwegian case study of the establishment of a contribution in aphasic interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15, 213-239.
37. McConkey, R., Morris, I., & Purcell, M. (1999). Communications between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 194-205.
38. Mondada, L. (2003). Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions. Visual Studies, 18, 58-73.
39. Mundy, P., Sigman, M., Kasari, C., & Yirmiya, N. (1988). Nonverbal communication skills in Down syndrome children. Child Development, 59, 235-249.
40. Ochs, E., Schieffelin, B. B., & Platt, M. L. (1979). Propositions across utterances and speakers. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 251-268). New York: Academic Press.
41. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
42. Peräkylä, A. (2004). Two traditions of interaction research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 1-20.
43. Puddicombe, B. (1995). Face to face: Communicating with people who do not use language. London: Values Into Action.
44. Rapley, M. (2004). The social construction of intellectual disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Rapley, M., & Antaki, C. (1996). A conversation analysis of the acquiescence of people with learning disabilities. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 207-227.
46. Rapley, M., Kiernan, P., & Antaki, C. (1998). Invisible to themselves or negotiating identity? The interactional management of "being intellectually disabled." Disability and Society, 13, 807-827.
47. Rondal, J. A., & Edwards, S. (1997). Language in mental retardation. London: Whurr.
48. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1 and 2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
49. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.
50. Shegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defence of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295-1345.
51. ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.
52. Wareing, D., & Newell, C. (2005). Commonsense and the doing of sheltered care: A case study. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 30, 104-114.