Producing decisions in service-user groups for people with an intellectual disability: Two contrasting facilitator styles

Mental Retardation

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 322-343

  Antaki, Charles ^a   Finlay, W M L ^b   Sheridan, Emma ^b   Jingree, Treena ^b   Walton, Chris ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MENTAL RETARDATION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL FACILITATION;

EID: 33751322948     PISSN: 00476765     EISSN: 00476765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[322:PDISGF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Antaki, C. (1999). Assessing quality of life of persons with a learning disability: How setting lower standards may inflate well-being scores. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 437-454.
2. Antaki, C. (2002). Personalising a question to repair a failed answer. Discourse Studies, 4, 411-428
3. Antaki, C, Finlay, W. M. L., & Walton, C. (in press). The staff are your friends: Conflicts between institutional discourse and practice. British Journal of Social Psychology.
4. Antaki, C., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Rapley, M. (2000). "'Brilliant. next question. . . ": High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 235-262.
5. Antaki, C., Young, N., & Finlay, M. (2005). Shaping clients' answers: Departures from neutrality in care staff interviews with people with a learning disability. Disability and Society, 17, 435-455.
6. Aspis, S. (1997). Self-advocacy for people with learning difficulties: Does it have a future? Disability and Society, 12, 647-654.
7. Blake, R. (2004). Chair's report. People First Annual Report 2003-4 (pp. 1-3). London: People First.
8. Crawley, B. (1988). The growing voice: A survey of self-advocacy groups in adult training centres and hospitals in Great Britain. London: Community Mental Health.
9. Department of Health (United Kingdom). (2001). Valuing people. London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
10. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
11. Goodley, D. (2000). Self-advocacy in the lives of people with learning difficulties. Buckingham: Open University Press.
12. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardised survey interview: The living questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Antaki, C. (1997). Creating happy people by asking yes/no questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 285-313.
15. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Oxford: Polity Press.
16. Jingree, T., Finlay, M., & Antaki, C. (2006). Empowering words, disempowering actions: An analysis of interactions between staff members and people with learning disabilities in residents' meetings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 212-226.
17. Johnson, R. (2004). The National Team Report. People First Annual Report 2003-4 (pp. 6-10). London: People First.
18. Local, J. (1996). Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 177-230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Marková, I. (1991). Asymmetries in group conversation between a tutor and people with learning difficulties. In I. Marková & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.
20. Rapley, M., Kiernan, P., & Antaki, C. (1998). Invisible to themselves or negotiating identity? The interactional management of "being intellectually disabled." Disability and Society, 13, 807-827.
21. Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54-69). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
22. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1 and 2). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
23. Schegloff, E. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?" Sociological Inquiry, 50, 104-152.
24. Schenkein, J. (1978). Identity negotiation in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 55-77). New York: Academic Press.
25. Shakespeare, P. (1997). Aspects of confused speech: A study of verbal interaction between confused and normal speakers. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Simons, K. (1992). Sticking up for yourself: Self-advocacy and people with learning difficulties. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
27. ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.
28. Whittacker, A. (1996). The fight for self-advocacy. In P. Mittler & V. Sinason (Eds.), Changing policy and practice for people with learning difficulties. London: Cassell.
29. Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis. London: Sage.
30. Wootton, A. (1989). Speech to and from a severely retarded young Down's syndrome child. In M. Beveridge, G. Conti-Ramsden, & I. Leudar (Eds.), The language and communication of mentally handicapped people. London: Chapman-Hall.
31. Worrell, B. (1987). Walking the fine line: the People First advisor. Entourage, 2, 30-35.