The socio-economic dimensions of ICT-driven educational change

Computers and Education

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1175-1188

  Müller, Jörg ^a   Sancho Gil, Juana M ^a   Hernández, Fernando ^a   Giró, Xavier ^a   Bosco, Alejandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cooperative collaborative learning; Interdisciplinary projects; Learning communities; Pedagogical issues; Secondary education

Indexed keywords

COST ACCOUNTING; EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES; SECONDARY EDUCATION;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 34548039969     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson S., and Stiegelbauer S. Institutionalization and renewal in a restructured secondary school. School Organization 14 3 (1994) 279-293
2. Bozionelos N. Socio-economic background and computer use: the role of computer anxiety and computer experience in their relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61 (2004) 725-746
3. Becta (2005). Open source software in schools: a case study report. Available from http://www.becta.org/publications (Retrieved June 2005).
4. Berman P., and McLaughlin M.W. Federal programs supporting educational change Vol. VIII (1978), Rand, Santa Monica, CA
5. Blamire, R. (2003). User needs report. Unpublished report OASIS Project. D1.1.
6. Carmichael P., and Honour L. Open Source as appropriate technology for global education. International Journal of Educational Development 22 (2002) 47-53
7. Cernochová, M., Sulovsky, J., Sinor, S., Sancho, J., Larrain, V., Bosco, A., et al. (2004). Assessment of "SCHOOL+" 2nd Pilot. Unpublished report School+ Project. D8.2.
8. Chan, M. H. & So, K. K. T. (2005). Utilizing Open Source Software in Schools of Hong Kong. In The first international conference on capacity building for information technology integration in teaching and learning (CBIT2005), June 1-4, 2005. Hong Kong: Baptist University. Available fromhttp://www.cite.hku.hk/people/tkkso/Publications/2005/UtilizingOpenSourceSoftwareSummaryCBIT2005.doc (Retrieved online June 2005).
9. Cooper, C. (2003, January 22). Microsoft shows Linux some respect. San Francisco, CA: ZDNet News. Available from http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-981552.html (Retrieved June 2005).
10. Cuban L. How teachers taught: constancy and change in American classrooms 1890-1990 (1993), Teachers College Press, New York
11. Cuban L. Oversold and underused. Computers in classrooms (2001), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Cuban L., Kirkpatrick H., and Peck C. High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal 38 4 (2001) 813-834
13. In: English F.W. (Ed). Sage handbook of educational leadership: advances in theory, research, and practice (2004), Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA
14. European Commision, (2002). Detailed work programme on the follow-up of the objectives of Education and training systems in Europe. Official Journal of the European Communities (2002/C 142/01). Available from http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2002/c_142/c_14220020614en00010022.pdf (Retrieved Oct 2005).
15. European Commision, (2003). eLearning: designing tomorrow's education. A Mid-term Report. Commission Staff Working Paper SEC (2003). Available from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/elearning/doc/mid_term_report_en.pdf (Retrieved Oct 2005).
16. European Commision, (2004). New indicators on education and training. Commission Staff Working Paper SEC (2004) 1524. Available from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/policies/2010/doc/indicators_en.pdf (Retrieved Oct 2005).
17. Eurydice, (2004). Key data on information and communication technologies in schools in Europe. 2004, Edition. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available from http://www.eurydice.org/Documents/KDICT/en/FrameSet.htm (Retrieved on-line October 2005).
18. Eurydice, (2005). Key data on education in Europe. 2005 Edition. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available from http://www.eurydice.org/Documents/cc/2005/en/FrameSet.htm (Retrieved on-line October 2005).
19. Facer K., Furlong J., Furlong R., and Sutherland R. Constructing the child computer user: from public policy to private practices. British Journal of Sociology of Education 22 1 (2001) 91-108
20. Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change (2001), Teachers College, New York
21. Georghiou, L., Rigby, J. & Cameron, H. (Ed.) (2002). Assessing the socio-economic impacts of the framework programme (ASIF). Policy research in engineering science and technology PREST. England: University of Manchester. Available from ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/fp5/docs/fp5_monitoring_socio-economic_final_report.pdf (Retrieved on-line June 2004).
22. Goodwin I., and Spittle S. The European Union and the information society. Discourse, power and policy. New Media and Society 4 2 (2002) 225-249
23. Gorard S. Adult learners in Wales: trajectories and technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 40 4 (2003) 395-403
24. Grace J., and Kenny C. A short review of information and communication technologies and basic education in LDCs - what is useful, what is sustainable?. International Journal of Educational Development 23 (2003) 627-636
25. Hargreaves A. Sustainable educational change: the role of social geographies. Journal of Educational Change 3 3-4 (2002) 189-214
26. Hargreaves A. Teaching in the knowledge society: education in the age of insecurity (2003), Open University, Buckingham [England]; Philadelphia
27. Hargreaves A., McCallum B., and Gipps C. Teacher feedback strategies in primary classroom - new evidence. In: Askew S. (Ed). Feedback for learning (2000), Paul Chapman, London
28. Harris A., Day Ch., Hopkins D., Hadfield M., Hargreaves A., and Chapman Ch. Effective leadership for school improvement (2003), RoutledgeFalmer, London
29. Hernández F. Transgressâo e mundanc a na educac âo. Os projetos de trabalho (1998), Artes Médicas, Porto Alegre
30. Hernández F. Os projetos de Trabalho: um mapa para navegantes em mares de incertezas. Projeto, Revista de Educaçâo 4 (2000) 2-7
31. Hernández F. Los proyectos de trabajo: Pasión en el proceso de aprender. Cuadernos de Pedagogía 332 (2004) 46-51
32. Hernández F., and Sancho J.M. A case study on the relationship between the innovative process of a secondary school and the reform of the Spanish national curriculum. In: Sugrue C., and Day Ch. (Eds). Developing teachers and teaching practice. International research perspectives (2001), RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor and Francis Group, London 245-254
33. James J. Free software and the digital divide: opportunities and constraints for developing countries. Journal of Information Science 29 1 (2003) 25-33
34. Kent N., and Facer K. Different worlds? A comparison of young people's home and school ICT use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (2004) 440-455
35. Kovalik C. Reflections on a technology integration project. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 11 1 (2003) 73-90
36. Lessig L. The future of ideas. The fate of the commons in a connected world. The fate of the commons in a connected world (2002), Vintage Books, New York
37. Moffett C.A. Sustaining change: the answers are blowing in the wind. Educational Leadership 57 7 (2000) 35-38
38. Moyle, K. (2003). Open Source Software and Australien School Educatison. Australia:@education.au limited. Available from http://www.educationau.edu.au/papers/open_source.pdf (Retrieved June 2005).
39. Müller, J., Hayer, I., Samara, V., Heikinnen, P., Giró, X., & Cernochová, M., (2004). Socio-economic evaluation of School+ Project. Unpublished report School+ project D10.1.
40. Orzech, D. (2002, October 8). CIN: Linux TCO: Less than half the cost of Windows. Linux Today. St. Paul, MN: Jupitermedia. Available from http://www.cioupdate.com/article.php/10493_1477911 (Retrieved June 2005).
41. Paul, G., & Stegbauer, C., (2005). Is the digital divide between young and elderly people increasing? Firstmonday, 10(10). Available from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue10_10/paul/index.html (Retrieved June 2005).
42. Pelgrum W.J. Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education 37 1 (2001) 163-178
43. Sancho, J.M., Hernández, F., Müller, J., Bosco, A., Casablancas, S. & Larrain, V. (2002). Analysis of user needs. Unpublished report School+ Project. D1.1.
44. Sancho, J. M., Hernández, F., Müller, J., Bosco, A., Casablancas, S., Larrain, V., et al. (2003). Educational approach development report. Unpublished report School+ Project. D4.1.
45. Sancho, J. M., Bosco, A., Hernández, F., Müller, J., Larrain, V., Nuri, A., et al. (2004a). Final report. Unpublished report School+ Project. D12.3.
46. Sancho J.M., Hernández F., Bosco M.A., Larraín V., Potter L., Müller J., et al. Lessons learnt from the first SCHOOL+ Microcosmos Pilot regarding educational innovation. Eden 2004 Annual Conference. New Challenges and Partners in an Enlarged Europe. (2004), EDEN Secretariat, Budapest 274-278
47. Sarason S. The predictable failure of educational reform (1990), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
48. Schofield J.W., and Davidson A.L. The Internet in school (2001), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
49. Tapscott D. The digital divide. In: Pea R. (Ed). The Jossey-Bass reader on technology and learning (2000), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 127-154
50. Tyack D., and Tobin W. The "grammar" of schooling: why has it been so hard to change?. American Educational Research Journal 31 3 (1994) 453-480
51. Tye B.B. Hard truth: uncovering the deep structure of schooling (2000), Teachers College Press, New York
52. UNESCO. (1996). Information and communication technologies in development: a UNESCO perspective. Inter-Agency Project on Universal Access to Basic Communication and Information Services, CII-96/WS/6, September.
53. Volman M., van Eck E., Heemskerk I., and Kuiper E. New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers in Education 45 (2005) 35-55
54. Waring T., and Maddocks P. Open Source Software implementation in the UK public sector: evidence from the field and implications for the future. International Journal of Information Management 25 (2005) 411-428
55. Warschauer M. Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American 289 2 (2003) 42-48
56. Wheeler, D. (2005). Why Open Source/Free Software? Look at the numbers! Available from http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html (Retrieved Oct 2005).
57. Wood, D., 2002. The Think Project. Report available in European Schoolnet, rue de Treves 61, B-1040 Belgium.