On learner control in e-learning

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 250, Issue , 2006, Pages 41-48

  Stary, Chris ^a   Totter, Alexandra ^b  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Controllability; e learning; Knowledge transfer; Self management

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEMS; DATA TRANSFER; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; PEDAGOGICAL THEORY; SELF-MANAGEMENT;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 34548021669     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1274892.1274900     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Auinger, A., Schwan, S., Stary, Ch., & Mielach, E. (2003b). Evaluierung von selbstgesteuertem Wissenstransfer. In Proceedings DeLFI'03, LNI, GI, 361-371.
2. Auinger, A., Pumberger, A., Tober, M., Stary, Ch., & Wageneder, G. (2004). Die didaktische Aufbereitung von Content als bestimmendes Merkmal von selbstgesteuertem Wissenstransfer. In Proceedings DeLFI,04, LNI, GI, 355-356.
3. Auinger, A., & Stary, Ch. (2005). Didaktikgeleiteter Wissenstransfer. Interaktive Informationsräume für Lern-Gemeinschaften im Web. Deutschland, Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
4. Baudin, V., Faust, M., Kaufmann, H., Litsa, V., Mwanza, D., Pierre, A., et al. (2004). LAB @FUTURE: Moving Towards the Future of e-Learning. In Proceedings World Computer Congress/IFIP, Toulouse, Kluwer.
5. Blumstengel, A. (1998) Entwicklung hypermedialer Lernsysteme. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
6. Davydov, V. (1988). Problems of Developmental Teaching. The Experience of Theoretical and Experimental Psychological Research. Parts 1-3. Soviet Education 30 (8-10).
7. Duval, E.; Forte, E., Cardinaels, K., Verhoeven, B., van Durm, R., Hendrikx, et al. (2001). The Ariadne Knowledge Pool System. Communications of the ACM, 44(5), 73-78.
8. Engeström, Y. (1994). Training for Change: New Approach to Instruction and Learning in Working Life. Geneva: International Labour Office.
9. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
10. Ernest, P. (1995) The one and the many. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.) Constructivism in education. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.
11. Fürlinger, St., Auinger, A., & Stary, Ch. (2004). Interactive Annotations in Web-based Learning Environments, In Proceedings ICALT04, IEEE, 360-364.
12. Honebein, P. (1996) Seven goals for the design of Constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.) Constructivist learning environments. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
13. Issing, L. J., & Klimsa, P. (ed.) (2002). Information und Lernen mit Multimedia im Internet. GermanyWeinheim: Beltz.
14. Jonassen, D. H. (1991) Evaluating Constructivist Learning. Educational Technology, 36, 28-33.
15. Jonassen, D. H. (1991) Objectivism vs. Constructivism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 5-14.
16. Jonassen, D. H. (1994) Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 34, 34-37.
17. Kamentz, E., & Womser-Hacker, Ch. (2003). Lerntheorie und Kultur: eine Voruntersuchung für die Entwicklung von Lernsystemen für internationale Zielgruppen. In Proceedings Mensch & Computer 2003, GI & ACM, Teubner, Stuttgart, 359-369.
18. Kerres, M., de Witt, C., & Stratmann, J. (2002). E-Learning. Didaktische Konzepte für erfolgreiches Lernen, In K. Schwuchow, J. Guttmann, & J. Leuchterhand(Eds.). Jahrbuch Personalent-wicklung & Weiterbildung.
19. Kienle, A.; Herrmann, T. (2002). Integration von Kommunikation und Kooperation an Hand von Lernmaterial. In Proceedings.. Mensch & Computer 2002, GI & ACM, Teubner, Stuttgart, 45-54.
20. Lester, J.C, Stone, B.A., & Stelling, G.D. (1999). Lifelike Pedagogical Agents for Mixed-Initiative Problem Solving in Constructivist Learning Environments, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 9(1), 1-44.
21. th Ann. Int. Conf. on Computer Documentation, ACM/SIGOC, 173-180.
22. Montessori M. (1991). Die Entdeckung des Kindes. Germany/Freiburg: Herder.
23. Mwanza, D. & Engeström, Y. (2004) Pedagogical Evaluation Guidelines (WP 2 Report): Contributing to D2.1, D6.1, D7.1. Finland, Centre for Activity Theory & Developmental Work Research, University of Helsinki.
24. Norman, D.A., & Spohrer, J.C. (1996). Learner-Centered Education, Communications of the ACM 39(4), 24-27.
25. Resnick, M., Bruckman, A., & Martin, F. (1996). Pianos, not Stereos. Creating Computational Construction Kits, interactions 3(8), ACM, 41-50.
26. Rôder, St. (2003). Eine Architektur für individualisierbare computergestützte Lernumgebungen. Grundlagen, Modularisierung, und prototypische Realisierung. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
27. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Technologies for Knowledge-Building Discourse, Communications of the ACM, 36(5), 37-41.
28. Schaumburg, H. (2002) Konstruktivistischer Unterricht mit Laptops? Eine Fallstudie zum Einfluss mobiler Computer auf die Methodik des Unterrichts. Fachbereich Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie. Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin.
29. Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Vahey, Ph., & Penuel, W.R. (2003) Handhelds go to School: Lessons Learned. IEEE Computer, 36(9), 30-37.
30. Totter, A., & Grote, G. (2005). Interaction Analysis of Learning and Teaching Processes for Formative Evaluation of e-learning Systems. In Proc. AIED'05 Workshop on Usage Analysis in Learning Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
31. Wilson, B. & Cole, P. (1991) A review of cognitive teaching models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 47-64.