Bioretrofeeding and computer games as complement to the study of the motor control of the arm and hand in patients with secuels of cerebro vascular disease;Biorretroalimentación y juegos de computadora como complemento del manejo de limitación inducida sobre el control motor de la extremidad superior del paciente con secuelas de enfermedad vascular cerebral

Archivos de Neurociencias

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 77-85

  Santos, Marisela Carrillo ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Brain vascular stroke; Computer games; Reatroalimentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; STROKE;

EID: 34547945782     PISSN: 01874705     EISSN: 01874705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cantú C, Tálama O, Mejía A, Rodríguez J, Murillo L, Osorno M, et al. Prevención primaria de la enfermedad vascular cerebral, Rev Inv Clin 2002;54:247-56.
2. Van der Lee J. Wagenaar R, Lankhorst G, Vogelaar T, Devillé W, Souter L. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients, Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999;30:2369-75.
3. Hallet M, Recent advances in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:211-7.
4. Morris D, Crago J, Luca S, Pidikiti R, Taub E. Constrain induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil 1997;9:29-43.
5. Van der Lee J. Constrain induced therapy for stroke: more of the same or something completely different?, Curr Opin Neurol 2001;14:741-4.
6. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constrain induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation, a clinical review, J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:237-51.
7. Wolf S, Lecraw D, Sarton L, Jann S. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head injured patients, Exp Neurol 1989;104:125-32.
8. Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh S, Taub E. Increased use of the left hand in string players associated with increased cortical representation of the fingers. Science 1995;220:21-3.
9. Liepert J, Sauder H, Sommer M. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998;250:5-8.
10. Wiltner W, Sauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E, Effects of constraint induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke, a replication. Stroke 1999;30:586-92.
11. Dromerick A, Edwards D, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?. Stroke 2000;31:2984-8.
12. Kunkel A, Kopp S, Muller G, Virllringer K, Virllringer A, Taub E, et al. Constraint induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:624-8.
13. Sabari J, Kane L, Flanagan S, Steinberg A. Constraint - induced motor relearning after stroke: a naturalistic case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:524-8.
14. Sterr A, Freivogel S, Schmalohr D. Neurobehavioural aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1726-31.
15. Schaechter J, Kraft E, Hilliard T, Dijkhuizen R, Senner T, Finklestein S, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:326-38.
16. Basmaajian J. Biofeedback principes and practice for clinicians. 3a edition, Baltimore Williams & Willkins, 1989.
17. Schleenbaker R, Mainous A. Electromyographic biofeedback for neuromuscular reeducation in the hemiplegic stroke patients: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:1301-4.
18. Brudny J, Korein J, Grynbaum B, Friedmann L, Winstein S, Sachs-Frankel G, et al. EMG feedback therapy: review of treatment of 114 patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1976;57:55-71.
19. Taub E, Wolf S. Constrain induced techniques to facilitate upper extremity use in stroke patients. Topics Rehabil 199;3:38-61.
20. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. "Mini-mental state" a practical method for gradinf the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychyatr Res 1975;12:189-98.
21. Taub E, Miller N, Novack T, Cook E, Fleming W, Nepomuceno C. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54.
22. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraintinduced Movement Therapy; a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation, a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Development 1999;36:237-51.
23. Reinkensmeyer D, Pang C, Nessler J, Painter C. Web - based telerehabilitation for the upper extremity after stroke. IEEE Transactions Neural Sys Rehabil Engine 2002;2:102-8.
24. Hendricks H, Van Limbeek J, Zwarts M. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1629-37.
25. Alberts J, Butler A, Wolf S. The effects of constraint induced therapy on precision grip: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004;18:250.
26. Levy C, Nichols D, Schmalbrock O, Keller P, Chakeres D, Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper linb stroke hemiplegia treated with induced movement therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:4-12.
27. Inglis J, Donald M, Mopnga T, Sproule M, Young M. Electromyographic biofeedback and physical therapy of the hemiplegic upper limb. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:755-9.