Assessing the format of the presentation of text in developing a Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (R-SAT)

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 199-204

  Gilliam, Sara ^a   Magliano, Joseph P ^a   Millis, Keith K ^a   Levinstein, Irwin ^b   Boonthum, Chutima ^b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547850189     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193148     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. CHI, M. T. H., BASSOK, M., LEWIS, M. W., REIMANN, R., & GLASER, R. (1989). Self-explanation: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
2. CHRISTIAN, P. (1998, March). Soundex - can it be improved? Computers in Genealogy, 6(5).
3. CORDÓN, L. A., & DAY, J. D. (1996). Strategy use on standardized reading comprehension tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 288-295.
4. COTÉ, N., & GOLDMAN, S. R. (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children's think-aloud protocols. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 169-193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. ERICSSON, K. A., & SIMON, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. JUST, M. A., & CARPENTER, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
7. MAGLIANO, J. P., & MILLIS, K. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure and latent semantic analysis. Cognition & Instruction, 21, 251-284.
8. MAGLIANO, J. P., MILLIS, K. K., GILLIAM, S., LEVINSTEIN, I., & BOONTHUM, C. (2006). Assessing the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Houston, TX.
9. MAGLIANO, J. P., MILLIS, K. K., LEVINSTEIN, I., & BOONTHUM, C. (2005). Developing the Reading Strategy Assessment Tool (R-SAT). Presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society for Computers in Psychology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
10. MAGLIANO, J. P., WIEMER-HASTINGS, K., MILLIS, K. K., MUÑOZ, B. D., & MCNAMARA, D. S. (2002). Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 181-188.
11. MCNAMARA, D. S., LEVINSTEIN, I. B., & BOONTHUM, C. (2004). iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 222-233.
12. MILLIS, K. K., KIM, H. J., TODARO, S., MAGLIANO, J. P., WIEMER-HASTINGS, K., & MCNAMARA, D. S. (2004). Identifying reading strategies using latent semantic analysis: Comparing semantic benchmarks. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 213-231.
13. MILLIS, K. K., MAGLIANO, J. P., & TODARO, S. (2006). Measuring discourse-level processes with verbal protocols and latent semantic analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 251-283.
14. MILLIS, K. [K], MAGLIANO, J [P.]., W IEMER-HASTINGS, K., TODARO, S., & MCNAMARA, D. S. (in press). Assessing and improving comprehension with Latent Semantic Analysis. In T. Landaulet, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. MUÑOZ, B., MAGLIANO, J. P., SHERIDAN, R., & MCNAMARA, D. S. (2006). Typing versus thinking aloud when reading: Implications for computer-based assessment and training tools. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 211-217.
16. PRESSLEY, M., & AFFLERBACH, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. SNOW, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Pittsburgh: Rand.
18. TODARO, S., MAGLIANO, J. P., MILLIS, K. K., KURBY, C. A., & MCNAMARA, D. S. (2006). Understanding factors that influence the content and form of verbal protocols: The roles of the reader and the text. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19. TRABASSO, T., & MAGLIANO, J. P. (1996a). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287.
20. TRABASSO, T., & MAGLUNO, J. P. (1996b). How do children understand what they read and what can we do to help them? In M. Graves, P. van den Broek, & B. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: A right of all children (pp. 158-181). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University Press.
21. WHITNEY, P., & BUDD, D. (1996). Think-aloud protocols and the study of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 341-351.
22. ZWAAN, R. A., & BROWN, C. M. (1996). The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation-model construction. Discourse Processes, 21, 289-328.