Short-term forecasting of halibut CPUE: Linear and non-linear univariate approaches

Fisheries Research

Volumn 86, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 120-128

  Czerwinski, Ivone Alejandra ^a   Gutiérrez Estrada, Juan Carlos ^b   Hernando Casal, José Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÁDIZ   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HUELVA   (Spain)

Author keywords

ARIMA models; Artificial neural network (ANN); Census X12; Hippoglossus stenolepis; Prediction; Time series

Indexed keywords

HIPPOGLOSSUS STENOLEPIS; PLEURONECTIDAE;

EID: 34547850159     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abrahart R.J., and See L. Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments. Hydrol. Process. 14 (2000) 2157-2172
2. Anctil F., and Rat A. Evaluation of neural network stream flow forecasting on 47 watersheds. J. Hydrol. Eng. 10 (2005) 85-88
3. Becerra-Muñoz S., Buelna-Obsen H.R., and Catalán-Romero J.M. Spatial patterns of ARIMA modeled rates of changes of atherinids (Chirostoma spp.) and goodeid Chapalichthys encaustus from Lake Chapala, México. Ecol. Model. 165 (2003) 237-250
4. Box G.E.P., and Jenkins G.M. Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control (1976), Holden-Day, San Francisco, CA
5. Clark W.G., and Hare S.R. A conditional constant catch policy for managing the Pacific halibut fishery. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 24 (2004) 106-113
6. Geernaert, T., Clark, B., Gilroy, H., 2005. Commercial halibut catch and effort for IPHC statistical areas on the B.C. coast (Regulatory Area 2B). International Pacific Halibut Commission. http://www.iphc.washington.edu/halcom/commerc/2bcpue2004.pdf.
7. Govindajaru R.S. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I. Preliminary concepts. J. Hydrol. Eng. 5 (2000) 115-123
8. Gozlan R.E., Mastrorillo S., Copp G.H., and Lek S. Predicting the structure and diversity of young-of-the-year fish assemblages in large rivers. Fresh Biol. 41 (1999) 809-820
9. Griñó R. Neural networks for univariate time series forecasting and their application to water demand prediction. Neural Net. World 2 (1992) 437-450
10. Guégan J.F., Lek S., and Oberdorff T. Energy availability and habitat heterogeneity predict global riverine fish diversity. Nature 391 (1998) 382-384
11. Gutiérrez-Estrada J.C., Pulido-Calvo I., and Prenda-Marín J. Gonadosomatic index estimates of an introduced pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus L. 1758) population in a Mediterranean stream, using computational neural networks (CNNs). Aquat. Sci. 62 (2000) 350-362
12. Gutiérrez-Estrada J.C., de Pedro-Sanz E., López-Luque R., and Pulido-Calvo I. Comparison between traditional methods and artificial neural networks for ammonia concentration forecasting in an eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) intensive rearing system. Aquat. Eng. 31 (2004) 183-203
13. Haddom M. Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries (2001), Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
14. Hänninen J., Vuorinen I., and Kornilovs G. Atlantic climatic factors control decadal dynamics of a Baltic Sea copepod Temora longicornis. Ecography 26 5 (2003) 672-678
15. Holton-Winson J., and Keating B. Previsión en los negocios (1996), Richard D. Irwin, Madrid
16. Kitanidis P.K., and Bras R.L. Real time forecasting with a conceptual hydrological model. 2. Applications and results. Water Resour. Res. 16 (1980) 1034-1044
17. Legates D.R., and McCabe Jr. G.J. Evaluating the use of 'goodness-of-fit' measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res. 35 (1999) 233-241
18. Lek S., Belaud A., Baran P., Dimopoulos I., and Delacoste M. Role of some environmental variables in trout abundance models using neural networks. Aquat. Liv. Res. 9 (1996) 23-29
19. Lek S., Delacoste M., Baran P., Dimopoulos I., Lauga J., and Aulanier S. Application of neural networks to modelling non-linear relationships in ecology. Ecol. Model. 90 (1996) 39-52
20. Lloret J., Lleonart J., and Solé I. Time Series modelling of landings in Northwest Mediterranean Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57 (2000) 171-184
21. Loher T., and Seitz A. Seasonal migration and environmental conditions of Pacific halibut Hippoglossus stenolepis, elucidated from pop-up archival transmitting (PAT) tags. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 317 (2006) 259-271
22. Low, L.L., Stocker, M., 2005. Annual Report 2004. International Pacific Halibut Commission, Seattle, USA.
23. Makridakis S., Wheelwrighy S., and McGee V. Forecasting: Methods and Applications (1983), John Wiley and Sons, New York
24. McLaughlin R.L. Forecasting models: sophisticated or naïve?. J. Forecast. 2 3 (1983) 27-276
25. Nash J.E., and Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I. A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10 (1970) 282-290
26. Phillips G.M. Interactions between fishing effort and catch per unit effort in the San Pedro fishery: a statistical note. CalCOFI Rep. 24 (1983) 255-258
27. Punzón A., Villamor B., and Preciado I. Analysis of the handline fishery targeting mackerel (Scomber scombrus L.) in the North of Spain (ICES Division VIIIbc). Fish. Res. 69 (2004) 189-204
28. Qi M., and Zhang G.P. An investigation of model selection criteria for neural network time series forecasting. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132 (2001) 666-680
29. Quinn T.J. Catch-per-unit-effort-a statistical-model for Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42 (1985) 1423-1429
30. Rigby, P.W, Ackley, D.R., Funk, F., Geiger, H.J., Kruse, G.H., Murphy, M.C., 1995. Management of marine fisheries resources of Alaska: a report to the Northern Forum. Regional Information Report: 5J95-04. ADF&G, Commercial Fisheries Management and Development Division.
31. Romilly P. Time series modelling of global mean temperature for managerial decision-making. J. Env. Manage. 76 (2005) 61-70
32. Shepherd A.J. Second-order Methods for Neural Networks (1997), Springer, New York
33. Stenseth N.C., Lekve K., and Gjöæter J. Modeling species richness controlled by community-intrinsic and community-extrinsic processes: coastal fish communities as an example. Popul. Ecol. 44 (2002) 165-178
34. Stergiou K.I. Modelling and forecasting the fishery for pilchard (Sardina pilchardus) in Greek waters using ARIMA time series models. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 46 (1989) 16-23
35. Stergiou K.I. Prediction of the Mullidae fishery in the eastern Mediterranean 24 months in advance. Fish. Res. 9 (1990) 67-74
36. Stergiou K.I. Describing and forecasting the sardine-anchovy complex in the eastern Mediterranean using vector autoregressions. Fish. Res. 11 (1991) 127-141
37. Stergiou K.I., Chritou E.D., and Petrakis G. Modelling and forecasting monthly fisheries catches: comparison of regression, univariate and multivariate time series methods. Fish. Res. 29 (1997) 55-95
38. Stocker M., and Noakes D.J. Evaluating forecasting procedures for predicting Pacific herring (Cuplea harengus pallasi) recruitment in British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45 (1988) 928-935
39. Tanaka E. Estimating of relative biomass of recruits using catch and effort series. Fish. Res. 66 (2000) 249-256
40. Tsoukalas L.H., and Uhrig R.E. Fuzzy and Neural Approaches in Engineering (1997), Wiley/Interscience, New York
41. Ventura S., Silva M., Pérez-Bendito D., and Hervás C. Artificial neural networks for estimation of kinetic analytical parameters. Anal. Chem. 67 (1995) 1521-1525
42. Yaffee R., and McGee M. Introduction to Time Series Analysis and Forecasting with Applications of SAS and SPSS (2000), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
43. Zhang C.I., Gunderson D.R., and Sullivan P.J. Using data on biomass and fishing mortality in stock production modelling of flatfish. Neth. J. Sea Res. 27 (1991) 459-467