A method for team intention inference

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 393-413

  Kanno, Taro ^a   Nakata, Keiichi ^a   Furuta, Kazuo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Intention inference; Man machine communication; Mutual belief; Team intention

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

TEAM INFERENCE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0037394903     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00011-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bratman, M.E., 1992. Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review 101, 327-341.
2. Carberry, M.S., 1993. Plan Recognition in Natural Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Carberry, M.S., 2001. Techniques for plan recognition. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction 11, 31-48.
4. Conte, R., 1989. Institutions and intelligent systems. In: Jackson, M.C., Keys, P., Cropper, S.A. (Eds.), Operational Research and Social Sciences. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 201-206.
5. Devaney, M., Ram, A., 1998. Needles in a haystack: plan recognition in large spatial domains involving mltiAgents. Proceedings of the 1998 American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 942-947.
6. Furuta, K., Sakai, T., Kondo, S., 1998. Heuristics for intention inferencing in plant operation. Proceedings of the 4th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, pp. 1907-1912.
7. Goodman, B.A., Litman, D.J., 1992. On the interaction between plan recognition and intelligent interfaces. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 2, 83-115.
8. Hatakeyama, N., Furuta, K., 2000. Bayesian network modeling of operator's state recognition process. Proceeding of the 5th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, pp. 53-58.
9. Hollnagel, E., 1992. The design of fault tolerant systems: prevention is better than cure. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 36, 231-237.
10. Hollnagel, E., 1993. Human Reliability Analysis. Academic Press, New York.
11. Hollnagel, E., 1995. Automation, Coping, and Control, Proceedings of Post HCI'95 Conference Seminar on Human-Machine Interface in Process Control, pp. 21-32.
12. Hutchins, E., 1995. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Lesh, N., Etzioni, O., 1996. Scaling Up Goal Recognition. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 178-189.
14. Levi, K., Shalin, V., Perschbacher, D., 1990. Learning plans for an intelligent assistant by observing user behavior. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 33, 489-503.
15. Martial, F., 1992. Coordinating Plans of Autonomous Agents, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 610, Springer-Verlag, New York.
16. Norman, D.A., 1988. The Psychology or Everyday Things. Basic Books Inc. New York.
17. Paris, C.R., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., 2000. Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics 43, 1052-1075.
18. Reason, J., 1990. Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. New York.
19. Rasmussen, J., 1986. Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction. Elsevier, New York.
20. Rubin, K.S., Jones, P.M., Michell, C.M., 1988. OFMspert: inference of operator intentions in supervisory control using a blackboard architecture. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 18, 618-637.
21. Searle, J.R., 1989. Collective Intentions and Actions Intentions in Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 401-415.
22. Suchman, L.A., 1987. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
23. Tuomela, R., Miller, K., 1987. We-intentions. Philosophical Studies 53, 367-389.
24. Vicente, K.J., Rasmussen, J., 1990. The ecology of human machine systems. Ecological Psychology 2, 207-249.