Toxicological evaluation of cigarettes with two banded cigarette paper technologies

Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 17-27

  Theophilus, Eugenia H ^a   Pence, Deborah H ^a   Meckley, Daniel R ^a   Keith Shreve, W ^a   Ayres, Paul H ^a   Bombick, Betsy R ^a   Borgerding, Michael F ^a   Garner, Charles D ^a   Swauger, James E ^a  

^a R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Banded; Cigarette; Cigarette paper; In vitro; In vivo; Toxicology

Indexed keywords

CIGARETTE SMOKE; NEUTRAL RED;

AMES TEST; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; FEMALE; GENOTOXICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INHALATION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; RAT; SENSITIVE TO CARCINOGENESIS MOUSE; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; SKIN TUMOR;

MUS; NICOTIANA TABACUM; RATTUS;

EID: 34547689061     PISSN: 09402993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.etp.2007.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Appleton S, Krautter GR, Lauterbach JH. Toxicological evaluation of a new cigarette paper designed for lowered ignition propensity. Fifty-seventh Tob science research conference, vol. 16, 2003.
2. Avalos J.T., Lawlor T.E., Fowler K.W., Bombick B.R., and Doolittle D.J. A comparison of the effectiveness of Salmonella strains for detecting mutagenicity of a cigarette smoke condensate. Environ Mol Mutagen 37 32 (2001) 19
3. Ayres P.H., Hayes J.R., Higuchi M.A., Mosberg A.T., and Sagartz J.W. Subchronic inhalation by rats of mainstream smoke from a cigarette that primarily heats tobacco compared to a cigarette that burns tobacco. Inhal Toxicol 13 (2001) 149-186
4. Bernstein L., Kaldor J., McCann J., and Pike M.C. An empirical approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenesis data from the Salmonella test. Mutat Res 97 (1982) 267-281
5. Bombick D.W., Bombick B.R., Ayres P.H., Putnam K., Avalos J., Borgerding M.F., et al. Evaluation of the genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of mainstream whole smoke and smoke condensate from a cigarette containing a novel carbon filter. Fund Appl Toxicol 39 (1997) 11-17
6. Borgerding M.F., Bodnar J.A., Chung H.L., Mangan P.P., Morrison C.C., Risner C.H., et al. Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 1. Chemical composition of mainstream smoke. Food Chem Toxicol 36 (1998) 169-182
7. Chepiga T.A., Morton M.J., Murphy P.A., Avalos J.T., Bombick B.R., Doolittle D.J., et al. A comparison of the mainstream smoke chemistry and mutagenicity of a representative sample of the US cigarette market with two Kentucky reference cigarettes (K1R4F and K1R5F). Food Chem Toxicol 38 (2000) 949-962
8. Connolly G.N., Alpert H.R., Rees V., Carpenter C., Wayne G.F., Vallone D., et al. Effect of the New York state cigarette fire safety standard on ignition propensity, smoke constituents, and the consumer market. Tob Control 14 (2005) 321-327
9. CORESTA. Machine smoking of cigarettes and determination of crude and dry smoke condensates. Standard method 10. CORESTA Inform Bull 1969;24-33.
10. Gaworski C.L., Heck J.D., Bennett M.B., and Wenk M.L. Toxicologic evaluation of flavor ingredients added to cigarette tobacco: skin painting bioassay of cigarette smoke condensate in SENCAR mice. Toxicology 139 (1999) 1-17
11. ILAR. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council. Washington: National Academy Press; 1996.
12. ISO. Cigarettes-routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine-definitions and standard conditions, ISO 3308. International Organization for Standardization, 2000.
13. Lulham G., Miller J., Rickert W.S., and Trevedi A. In vitro toxicity of lower ignition propensity (LIP) and conventional cigarettes. Toxicologist 90 1 (2006) 1965
14. Maron D.M., and Ames B.N. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. In: Kilbey B.J., Legator M., Nichols W., and Ramel C. (Eds). Handbook of mutagenicity test procedures (1984), Elsevier, Amsterdam 93-140
15. McKee R.H., Nicolich M.J., Scala R.A., and Lewis S.C. Estimation of epidermal carcinogenic potency. Fund Appl Toxicol 15 (1990) 320-328
16. Meckley D., Hayes J.R., Van Kampen K.R., Mosberg A.T., and Swauger J.E. A responsive, sensitive, and reproducible dermal tumor promotion assay for the comparative evaluation of cigarette smoke condensates. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 39 (2004) 135-149
17. Misra M., Leverette R.D., Hamm J.T., Bennett M.B., Heck J.D., Morrissey R., et al. Toxicological evaluation of a cigarette paper with reduced ignition propensity: in vitro and in vivo tests. Toxicologist 84 1 (2005) 1186
18. NCI. National Cancer Institute. Report No. 5. Toward less hazardous cigarettes. Summary: four skin paining bioassays using condensate from experimental cigarettes. Smoking and Health Program, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service. Washington: National Institute of Health; 1980.
19. Patskan G., Hsu F., Meisgen T., Stabbert R., Vanscheeuwijck P., and Veltel D. Toxicological characterization of a novel cigarette paper. Toxicologist 54 1 (2000) 398
20. Perry P., and Wolff S. New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature 251 (1974) 156-158
21. Pillsbury H.C., Bright C.C., O'Connor K.J., and Irish F.W. Tar and nicotine in cigarette smoke. J AOAC 52 (1969) 458-462
22. RJRT. Chemical and biological studies. New cigarette prototypes that heat instead of burn tobacco. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 88-92564. Winston-Salem, NC: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company; 1988.
23. Siegel S. Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (1956), McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
24. Steele R.H., Payne V.M., Fulp C.W., Rees D.C., Lee C.K., and Doolittle D.J. A comparison of the mutagenicity of mainstream cigarette smoke condensates from a representative sample of the US cigarette market with a Kentucky reference cigarette (K1R4F). Mutat Res 342 (1995) 179-190
25. Swauger J.E., Steichen T.J., Murphy P.A., and Kinsler S. An analysis of the mainstream smoke chemistry of samples of the US cigarette market acquired between 1995 and 2000. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 35 (2002) 142-156
26. US FDA. Toxicological principles for the safety assessment of direct food additives and color additives used in food. Washington, DC: FDA, Bureau of Foods; 1982, 1993.
27. Yahagi T., Degawa M., Seino Y., Matsushima T., Nagao M., Sugimura T., et al. Mutagenicity of carcinogenic azo dyes and their derivatives. Cancer Lett 1 (1975) 91-96