Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 61-75

  Fan, Lianghuo ^a   Zhu, Yan ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Curricular contents; Lower secondary mathematics; Mathematical problem solving; Mathematics textbooks; P lya's problem solving model; Problem solving heuristics; Textbook analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547673327     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-006-9069-6     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, J., & Holton, D. (1997). Problem solving in mathematics: Where are we? The Mathematics Educator, 2(2), 218-240.
2. Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA's third international mathematics and science study. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.
3. Bierhoff, H. (1996). Laying the foundations of numeracy: A comparison of primary school textbooks in Britain, Germany and Switzerland. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 15(4), 1-157.
4. Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. New York: Freeman.
5. Brenner, M. E., Herman, S., Ho, H., & Zimmer, J. M. (1999). Cross-national comparison of representational competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 541-557.
6. Brown, J. K. (1973). Textbook Use by Teachers and Students of Geometry and Second-year Algebra, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois.
7. Cai, J. (1995). A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students' mathematical performance on tasking involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Monograph series 7). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
8. Charles, R. I., & Lester, F. K., Jr. (1984). An evaluation of a process-oriented instructional program in mathematics problem solving in grades 5 and 7. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 15-34.
9. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington: Heath.
10. Fan, L., & Kaeley, G. S. (2000). The influence of textbook on teaching strategies: An empirical study. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 13(4), 2-9.
11. Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2000). Problem solving in Singaporean secondary mathematics textbooks. The Mathematics Educator, 5(1/2), 117-141.
12. Fischer, W. (2006). Historical topics as indicators for the existence of fundamentals in educational mathematics: An intercultural comparison. In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematical education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 95-110). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
13. Fujii, T. (2001). The changing winds in Japanese mathematics education. Mathematics Education Dialogue 2001(November), retrieved June 19, 2002, from http://www.nctm.org/dialogues/2001-11/20011105.htm.
14. Goertz, M. E. (2000). Implementing standards-based reform: Challenges for state policy. In T. Duggan & M. Holmes (Eds.), Closing the gap: A report on the wingspread conference: Beyond the standards horse race. Washington: Council for Basic Education.
15. Hatfield, M., Edwards, N. T., & Bitter, G. G. (1997). Mathematics methods for elementary and middle school teachers, (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 242-273.
17. Hensey, L. K. (1996). An Examination of Elementary Mathematics Textbook Problem-solving Items During the Nineties, and Possible Influences on the NCTM Standards on Such Items, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Iowa.
18. Higgins, K. M. (1997). The effect of year-long instruction in mathematical problem solving on middle-school students' attitudes, beliefs, and abilities. The Journal of Experimental Education, 66(1), 5-28.
19. Holmes, E. E. (1995). New directions in elementary school mathematics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren (J. Teller, trans.; J. Kilpatrick and I. Wirzup, Eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1968).
21. Lee, K. S. (1982). Fourth graders' heuristic problem-solving behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(2), 110-123.
22. Lester, F. K., Jr. (1978). Mathematical problem solving in the elementary school: Some educational and psychological considerations. In L. L. Hatfield & D. A. Bvradbard (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Papers from a research workshop (pp. 53-86). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 156446)
23. Li, Y. (1999). An Analysis of Algebra Content, Content Organization and Presentation, and To-be-solved Problems in Eighth-grade Mathematics Textbooks from Hong Kong, Mainland China, Singapore, and the United States, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
24. Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996). This is so: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbooks of mathematics education (pp. 371-410). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
25. Masingila, J. O., & Moellwald, F. E. (1993). Using Pólya to foster a classroom environment for real-world problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 93(5), 245-249.
26. Mayer, R. E., Sims, V., & Tajika, H. (1995). A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32(20), 443-460.
27. McConnell, J. W., Brown, S., Usiskin, Z., Senk, S. L, Widerski, T., Anderson, S., et al. (1996). UCSMP algebra (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
28. McCoy, L. P. (1994). Mathematics problem-solving processes of elementary male and female students. School Science and Mathematics, 94(5), 266-270.
29. Ministry of Education, China (1992). Nine-year compulsory education full-time junior high school mathematics syllabus. Beijing: People's Education.
30. Ministry of Education, China (2000). National mathematics curriculum standards (compulsory education). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
31. Ministry of Education, Singapore (1990). Mathematics syllabus (lower secondary). Singapore: Curriculum Planning Division.
32. Ministry of Education, Singapore (2000a). Mathematics syllabus (lower secondary). Singapore: Curriculum Planning Division.
33. Ministry of Education, Singapore (2000b). Mathematics syllabus (primary). Singapore: Curriculum Planning Division.
34. Ministry of Education, Singapore (2002). Education statistic digest. Singapore: Education Statistics Section.
35. Ministry of Education, Singapore (2003). Education statistic digest. Singapore: Education Statistics Section.
36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
37. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
38. Ng, L. E. (2002). Representation of Problem Solving in Singaporean Primary Mathematics Textbooks with Respect to Types, Pólya's Model, and Heuristics, Master Dissertation, National Institute of Education, Singapore.
39. Nibbelink, W. H., Stockdale, S. R., Hoover, H. D., & Mangru, M. (1987). Problem solving in the elementary grades: Textbook practices and achievement trends over the past thirty years. Arithmetic Teacher, 35(1), 34-37.
40. Oladunni, M. O. (1998). An experimental study on the effectiveness of metacognitive and heuristic problem solving techniques on computational performance of students in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 26(6), 867-874.
41. Pólya, G. (1971). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1979). Explicit heuristic training as a variable in problem-solving performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 173-187.
43. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). The wild, wild, wild, wild, wild, world of problem solving: A review of sorts. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(3), 40-47.
44. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic.
45. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
46. Seah, W. T. (1999). Values in Singaporean and Victorian lower secondary mathematics textbooks: A preliminary study. In M. A. Clements & Y. P. Leong (Eds.), Cultural and language aspects of science, mathematics and technical education (pp. 271-280). Brunei: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
47. Seah, W. T., & Bishop, A. J. (2000). Values in mathematics textbooks: A view through two Australasian regions. Paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 440870).
48. Stanic, G., & Kilpatrick, J. (1988). Historical perspective on problem solving in the mathematics curriculum. In R. Charles & E. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 1-22). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
49. State Education Commission, China (1992). Nine-year compulsory education full-time junior high school mathematics syllabus. Beijing: People's Education.
50. Stevenson, H. W., & Bartsch, K. (1992). An analysis of Japanese and American textbooks in mathematics. In R. Lectsma & H. Walberg (Eds.), Japanese educational productivity (pp. 103-133). Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies.
51. Teh, K. S., & Looi, C. K. (1997). New Syllabus D Mathematics 1 (General editor: Lee, P. Y.) (4th ed.), Singapore: Shing Lee.
52. Usiskin, Z., & Dossey, J. (2004). Mathematics education in the United States 2004: A capsule summary fact book written for the tenth international congress on mathematics education (ICME-10), Copenhagen, Demark. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
53. Usiskin, Z., Flanders, J., Hynes, C., Polonsky, L., Porter, S., & Viktora, S. (1995). Transition mathematics (2nd ed.). Glenview: Scott, Foresman.
54. Wilson, J. W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem solving. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 57-78). New York: Macmillan.
55. Zeng, T. (1997). On curriculum. China: Jiangxi Education.
56. Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2002). Textbook use by mathematics teachers at lower secondary school level in Singapore. In D. Edge & B. H. Yeap (Eds.), Mathematics education for a knowledge-based era: Proceedings of Second East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education and Ninth Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education, vol. 2 (pp. 194-201). Singapore.
57. Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2006). Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 609-626.