Evaluation of three methods for the characterisation of the membrane-solution interface: Streaming potential, membrane potential and electrolyte conductivity inside pores

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 168, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 87-100

  Fievet, P ^a   Szymczyk, A ^a   Aoubiza, B ^b   Pagetti, J ^a  

^a Lab Corros et Traitements de Surf   (France)

^b Laboratoire de Calcul Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

Electrolyte conductivity; Membrane potential; Outer Helmholtz Plane potential; Space charge model; Streaming potential

Indexed keywords

ELECTROLYTE;

FILTRATION; MEMBRANE; SEPARATION;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; MEMBRANE MODEL; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY OF LIQUIDS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROLYTES; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MICROFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION; PORE SIZE; SOLUTIONS; THERMODYNAMICS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; OUTER HELMHOLTZ PLANE; STREAMING POTENTIAL;

PERMSELECTIVE MEMBRANES;

EID: 0033888824     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00302-6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bacchin P., Aimar P., Sanchez V. Influence of surface interaction on transfer during colloid ultafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 115:1996;49-63.
2. Levenstein R., Hasson D., Semiat R. Utilization of the Donnan effect for improving electrolyte separation with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 116:1996;77-92.
3. Combe C., Guizard C., Aimar P., Sanchez V. Experimental determination of four characteristics used to predict the retention of a ceramic nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 129:1997;147-160.
4. Larbot A., Alami-Younssi S., Blanc P., Abrabri M., Persin M., Sarrazin J. Importance of electrostatic interactions for the selectivity of micro and mesoporous ceramic membranes. Key Eng. Materials. 132-136:1997;1687-1690.
5. Baticle P., Kiefer C., Lakhchaf N., Larbot A., Leclerc O., Persin M., Sarrazin J. Salt filtration on gamma alumina nanofiltration membranes fired at two different temperatures. J. Membr. Sci. 135:1997;1-8.
6. Abrabri M., Larbot A., Persin M., Sarrazin J. potassium titanyl phosphate membranes: surfaces properties and application to ionic solution filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 139:1998;275-283.
7. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. A theoretical basis for specifying nanofiltration membranes - dye/salt/water streams. Desalination. 117:1998;257-264.
8. Hagmeyer G., Gimbel R. Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination. 117:1998;247-256.
9. Nyström M., Aimar P., Luque S., Kulovaara M., Metsämuuronen S. Fractionation of model proteins using their physiochemical properties. Colloids and Surfaces A. 138:1998;185-205.
10. Nyström M., Laatikainen M., Turku K., Järvinen P. Resistance to fouling accomplished by modification of ultrafiltration membranes. Progr. Colloid Polym. Sci. 82:1990;321-329.
11. Nyström M., Kaipia L., Luque S. Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 98:1995;249-262.
12. P. Bacchin, J.A. Howell, R.W. Field, P. Aimar, V. Sanchez, Colloidal fouling: a comparison between yeasts and clays ultrafiltration, Proc. Euromembrane'95, vol. 1, 1995, pp. 1-41.
13. Causserand C., Jover K., Aimar P., Meireles M. Modification of clay cake permeability by adsorption of protein. J. Membr. Sci. 137:1997;31-44.
14. Benaventea J., Jonsson G. Effect of adsorbed protein on the hydraulic permeability, membrane and streaming potential values measured across a microporous membrane. Colloids and Surfaces A. 138:1998;255-264.
15. Jacobasch H.L., Schurz J. Characterization of polymer surfaces by means of electrokinetic measurements. Progr. Colloid & Polymer Sci. 77:1988;40-48.
16. Nyström M., Lindstrom M., Matthiason E. Streaming potential as a tool in the characterisation of UF membranes. Colloïds Surf. 36:1989;297-312.
17. Islam M.A., Nikolov N.D., Nikolova J.D. An electrical model for the relaxation of streaming potential across a charged membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 84:1993;29-36.
18. Kim K.J., Fane A.G., Nyström M., Pihlajamaki A., Bowen W.R., Mukhtar H. Evaluation of electroosmosis and streaming potential for measurement of electric charges of polymeric membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 116:1996;149.
19. Pontié M., Chasseray X., Lemordant D., Laine J.M. The streaming potential method for the characterization of ultrafiltration organic membranes and the control of cleaning treatments. J. Membr. Sci. 129:1997;125-133.
20. Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Mullet M., Reggiani J.C., Pagetti J. Comparison of two electrokinetic methods-elecro-osmosis and streaming potential to determine the zeta-potential of plane ceramic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 143:1998;293-294.
21. Möckel D., Staude E., Dal-cin M., Darcovich K., Guiver M. Tangential flow streaming potential measurements: hydrodynamic cell characterization and zeta potentials of carboxylated polysulfone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 145:1998;211-222.
22. Ibañez J.A., Forte J., Hernandez A., Tejerina F. Streaming potential and phenomenological coefficients nucleopore membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 36:1998;45-54.
23. Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Reggiani J.C., Pagetti J. Characterisation of surface properties of ceramic membranes by streaming and membrane potentials. J. Membr. Sci. 146:1998;277-284.
24. Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Reggiani J.C., Pagetti J. Characterisation of surface properties of ceramic UF membranes by studying diffusion-driven transport and streaming potential. Desalination. 119:1998;303-308.
25. Fievet P., Aoubiza B., Szymczyk A., Pagetti J. Membrane Potential in charged porous membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 160:1999;267-275.
26. Alberti G., Bastioli C., Casciola M., Marmottini F., Capannelli G., Munari S. Properties of polyvinylidène fluoride membranes at low degres of sulphonation and their characterization by concentration potential coupled with ac impedance measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 16:1983;121-135.
27. Lyklema J., Minor M. On surface conduction and its role in electrokinetics. Colloids and Surfaces A. 140:1998;33-41.
28. Benaventea J., Jonsson G. Electrokinetic characterization of a microporous non-commercial polysulfone membrane: phenomenological and transport parameters. Colloids and Surfaces A. 140:1998;339-346.
29. Gross R.J., Osterle J.F. Membrane transport characteristics of ultrafine capillaries. J. Chem. Phys. 54:1968;228-234.
30. Morrison F.A., osterle J.F. Electrokinetic energy conversion in ultrafine capillaries. J. Chem. Phys. 43:1965;2111-2115.
31. Fair J.C., Osterle J.F. Reverse electrodialysis in charged capillary membranes. J. Chem. Phys. 54:1971;3307-3316.
32. M. Jin, A theoretical model for coupled processes in inhomogeneous geological systems, M.S. Thesis. The University of Texas at Austin, 1989.
33. Elimelech M., Chen W.H., Wapya J.J. measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potenttial of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyser. Desalination. 95:1994;269-286.
34. Levine S., Marriott J.R., Neale G., Epstein N. theory of flow in fine cylindrical capillaries at high zeta-potentials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 52:1975;136-149.
35. Bowen W.R., Cao X. Electrokinetic effects in membrane poresand the determination of zeta-potential. J. Membr. Sci. 140:1998;267-273.
36. Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Aoubiza B., Simon C., Pagetti J. An application of the space charge model to the electrolyte conductivity inside a charged microporous membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 161:1999;275-285.
37. R.J. Hunter, Zeta Potential in Colloid Science, Principles and Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1981.
38. Szymczyk A., Aoubiza B., Fievet P., Pagetti J. Electrokinetic phenomena in homogeneous cylindrical pores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 216:1999;285-296.