A local model of information sharing in small groups

Communication Theory

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 252-280

  Bonito, Joseph A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION; MODELING;

EID: 34547404616     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: 14682885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00295.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bonito, J. A. (2001). An information-processing approach to participation in small groups. Communication Research, 28, 275-303.
3. Bonito, J. A. (2002). The analysis of participation in small groups: Methodological and conceptual issues related to interdependence. Small Group Research, 33, 412-438.
4. Bonito, J. A. (2003). Information processing and exchange in mediated groups: Interdependence and interaction. Human Communication Research, 29, 533-559.
5. Bonito, J. A. (2006). A longitudinal social relations analysis of participation in small groups. Human Communication Research, 32, 302-321.
6. Bonito, J. A., DeCamp, M. H., Coffman, M., & Ruppel, E. K. (2006, November). A longitudinal analysis of information processing and information sharing in small groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
7. Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. Communication Yearbook, 20, 227-261.
8. Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., Haas, S. M., Dobbs, L. K., Cardillo, L. W., & Russell, J. A. (2000). Communication in the management of uncertainty: The case of persons living with HIV or AIDS. Communication Monographs, 67(1), 63-84.
9. Burke, P. J. (1974). Participation and leadership in small groups. American Sociological Review, 39, 832-843.
10. Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 315.
11. Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2004). Application of the social relations model to family assessment. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 361-371.
13. Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101-109.
14. Corman, S. R., & Kuhn, T. (2005). The detectability of socio-egocentric group speech: A quasi-Turing test. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 117-143.
15. Crow, B. K. (1983). Topic shifts in couples' conversations. In K. Tracy & R. T. Craig (Eds.), Conversational coherence (pp. 136-156). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Durham, C. C., Locke, E. A., Poon, J. M. L., & McLeod, P. L. (2000). Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, information-seeking strategy, and performance. Human Performance, 13(2), 115-138.
17. Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (in press). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review.
18. Edwards, J. A. (1993). Principles and contrasting systems of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Fisek, M. H., Berger, J., & Norman, R. Z. (1991). Participation in hetero and homogeneous groups: A theoretical integration. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 114-142.
20. Franz, T. M., & Larson, J. R. J. (2002). The impact of experts on information sharing during group discussion. Small Group Research, 33, 383-411.
21. Geva, N., Mayhar, J., & Skorick, J. M. (2000). The cognitive calculus of foreign policy decision making: An experimental assessment. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44, 447-471.
22. Gill, S. J., Menlo, A., & Keel, L. P. (1984). Antecedents to member participation within small groups: A review of theory and research. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 9(2), 68-76.
23. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2002). Modeling the personality of dyads and groups. Journal of Personality, 70, 901-924.
24. Greene, J. O. (1997). A second generation action assembly theory. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 151-170). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 322-339.
26. Hayes, A. F. (2006). A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32, 385-410.
27. Hewes, D. E. (1986). A socio-egocentric model of group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 265-291). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Hewes, D. E. (1996). Small group communication may not influence decision making: An amplification of socio-egocentric theory. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 179-212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Jackson, S., Jacobs, S., & Rossi, A. M. (1987). Conversational relevance: Three experiments on pragmatic connectedness in conversation. Communication Yearbook, 11, 323-347.
30. Kalma, A. (1992). Gazing in triads: A powerful signal in floor apportionment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 21-39.
31. Kameda, T., Ohtsubo, Y., & Takezawa, M. (1997). Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence: An illustration in a group decision-making context. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73, 296-309.
32. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
33. Kenny, D. A. (2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8, 265-280.
34. Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448.
35. Knobloch, L. K., & Solomon, D. H. (2002). Information seeking beyond initial interaction: Negotiating relational uncertainty within close relationships. Human Communication Research, 28, 243-257.
36. Larson, J. R. (1997). Modeling the entry of shared and unshared information into group discussion: A review and BASIC language computer program. Small Group Research, 28, 454-479.
37. Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446-461.
38. Larson, J. R., Sargis, E. G., Elstein, A. S., & Schwartz, A. (2002). Holding shared versus unshared information: Its impact on perceived member influence in decision-making groups. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 24(2), 145-155.
39. Levy, D. M. (1979). Communicative goals and strategies: Between discourse and syntax. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and semantics (pp. 183-212). New York: Academic Press.
40. Meyers, R. A. (1989). Persuasive arguments theory: A test of assumptions. Human Communication Research, 15, 357-381.
41. Meyers, R. A., & Seibold, D. R. (1990). Perspectives on group argument: A critical review of persuasive arguments theory and an alternative structurational view. Communication Yearbook, 13, 268-302.
42. Morrison, E. W. (2002). Information seeking within organizations. Human Communication Research, 28, 229-242.
43. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 531-548.
44. O'Keefe, B. J., & Lambert, B. L. (1995). Managing the flow of ideas: A local management approach to message design. Communication Yearbook, 18, 54-82.
45. O'Keefe, D. J. (1987). Message description. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Boston.
46. Parker, K. C. (1988). Speaking turns in small group interaction: A context-sensitive event sequence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 965-971.
47. Pavitt, C. (1993). Does communication matter in social influence during small group discussion? Five positions. Communication Studies, 44, 216-227.
48. Pavitt, C., & Johnson, K. K. (1999). An examination of the coherence of group discussions. Communication Research, 26, 303-321.
49. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition Reasoning and Decision Making, 49(1), 123.
50. Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71(1), 74-102.
51. Propp, K. M. (1999). Collective information processing in groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 225-250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191-216.
53. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
54. Sanders, R. E. (1987). Cognitive foundations of calculated speech. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
55. Sanders, T. J., Spooren, W. P., & Noordman, L. G. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15(1), 1-35.
56. Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 28, 185-211.
57. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Shelly, R. K., & Troyer, L. (2001). Emergence and completion of structure in initially undefined and partially defined groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 318-332.
59. Sigman, S. J. (1984). Talk and interaction strategy in a task-oriented group. Small Group Research, 15(1), 33-51.
60. Skvoretz, J. (1981). Extending expectation states theory: Comparative status models of participation in N-person groups. Social Forces, 59, 752-770.
61. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
62. Stasser, G., Stewart, D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
63. Stasser, G., & Taylor, L. A. (1991). Speaking turns in face-to-face discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 675-684.
64. Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 67-78.
65. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
66. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 81-93.
67. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 304-313.
68. Stasser, G., & Vaughan, S. I. (1996). Models of participation during face-to-face unstructured discussion. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (pp. 165-192). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 102-116.
70. Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 12, 435-502.
71. Tracy, K. (1982). On getting the point: Distinguishing "issues" from "events," an aspect of conversational coherence. Communication Yearbook, 5, 279-301.
72. Vinokur, A., Trope, Y., & Burnstein, E. (1975). A decision-making analysis of persuasive argumentation and the choice-shift effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(2), 127-148.
73. Waldron, V. R. (1997). Toward a theory of interactive conversational planning. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 195-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Waldron, V. R., & Cegala, D. J. (1992). Assessing conversational cognition: Levels of cognitive theory and associated methodological requirements. Human Communication Research, 18, 599-622.
75. Weiner, S. L., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977). A move toward a psychology of conversation. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 213-225). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
76. Wilson, S. R. (1995). Elaborating the cognitive rules model of interaction goals: The problem of accounting for individual differences in goal formation. Communication Yearbook, 18, 3-25.
77. Wittenbaum, G. M., & Bowman, J. M. (2004). A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 169-184.
78. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., & Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286-310.
79. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978.