A longitudinal social relations analysis of participation in small groups

Human Communication Research

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 302-321

  Bonito, Joseph A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746644522     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00277.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior, New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
2. Balkwell, J. W. (1994). Status. In M. Foschi & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Group processes: Sociological analyses (pp. 119-148). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
3. Balkwell, J. W., & Berger, J. (1996). Gender, status, and behavior in task situations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 273-283.
4. Berger, J., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: The status-organizing process. In J. Berger, M. H. Fisek, R. Z. Norman, & M. Zelditch Jr. (Eds.), Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach (pp. 3-87). New York: Elsevier.
5. Bonito, J. A. (2001). An information-processing approach to participation in small groups. Communication Research, 28, 275-303.
6. Bonito, J. A. (2003). A social relations analysis of participation in small groups. Communication Monographs, 70, 83-97.
7. Bonito, J. A. (2004). Shared cognition and participation in small groups: Similarity of member prototypes. Communication Research, 31, 704-730.
8. Bottger, P. C. (1984). Expertise and air time as bases of actual and perceived influence in problem-solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 214-221.
9. Burgoon, J. K., Johnson, M. L, & Koch, P. T. (1998). The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Communication Monographs, 65, 308-335.
10. Burke, P. J. (1974). Participation and leadership in small groups. American Sociological Review, 39, 832-843.
11. Driskell, J. E., & Mullen, B. (1990). Status, expectations, and behavior: A meta-analytic review and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 541-553.
12. Fararo, T. J. (1989). The meaning of general theoretical sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Fisek, M. H., Berger, J., & Norman, R. Z. (1991). Participation in hetero and homogeneous groups: A theoretical integration. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 114-142.
14. Fisek, M. H., & Ofshe, R. (1970). The process of status evolution. Sociometry, 33, 327-335.
15. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Folger, J. P., Hewes, D. E., & Poole, M. S. (1984). Coding social interaction. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voight (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 115-161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. Gastil, J. (1993). Democracy in small groups. Philadelphia: New Society.
18. Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2002). Modeling the personality of dyads and groups. Journal of Personality, 70, 901-924.
19. Gouran, D. S. (2003). Communication skills for group decision making. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 835-870). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 47-58.
21. Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
22. Hewes, D. E. (1996). Small group communication may not influence decision making: An amplification of socio-egocentric theory. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 179-212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
25. Kenny, D. A. (2004). PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8, 265-280.
26. Kenny, D. A., Mohr, C. D., & Levesque, M. J. (2001). A social relations variance partitioning of dyadic behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 128-141.
27. Knottnerus, J. D. (1997). Social structural analysis and status generalization: The contributions and potential of expectation states theory. In J. Szmatka, J. Skvoretz, & J. Berger (Eds.), Status, network, and structure: Theory development in group processes (pp. 119-136). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
29. Kruger, J., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Actions, intentions, and self-assessment: The road to self-enhancement is paved with good intentions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 328-339.
30. Larson, J. R. (1997). Modeling the entry of shared and unshared information into group discussion: A review and BASIC language computer program. Small Group Research, 28, 454-479.
31. Lashley, B. R., & Kenny, D. A. (1998). Power estimation in social relations analyses. Psychological Methods, 3, 328-338.
32. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
33. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Marcus, D. K. (1998). Studying group dynamics with the social relations model. Group Dynamics, 2, 230-240.
35. Meeker, B. F. (1994). Performance evaluation. In M. Foschi & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Group processes: Sociology analyses (pp. 95-117). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
36. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 531-548.
37. Pavitt, C. (1993). Does communication matter in social influence during small group discussion? Five positions. Communication Studies, 44, 216-227.
38. Propp, K. M. (1999). Collective information processing in groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 225-250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
40. Sanders, R. E. (1987). Cognitive foundations of calculated speech. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
41. Shelly, R. K., & Troyer, L. (2001). Emergence and completion of structure in initially undefined and partially defined groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64, 318-332.
42. Sorrentino, R. M., & Boutillier, R. G. (1975). The effect of quantity and quality of verbal interaction on ratings of leadership ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 403-411.
43. Stasser, G., & Taylor, L. A. (1991). Speaking turns in face-to-face discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 675-684.
44. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
45. Stasser, G., & Vaughan, S. I. (1996). Models of participation during face-to-face unstructured discussion. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 165-192). Mahwah, NH: Erlbaum.
46. Swann, W. B., Jr., Kwan, V. S. Y., Polzer, J. T., & Milton, L. P. (2003). Waning of Stereotypic perceptions in small groups: Identity negotiation and erosion of gender expectations of women. Social Cognition, 21, 194-212.
47. Taylor, T. J. (1992). Mutual misunderstanding: Skepticism and the theorizing of language and interpretation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
48. Waldron, V. R. (1997). Toward a theory of interactive conversational planning. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 195-220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Waldron, V. R., & Cegala, D. J. (1992). Assessing conversational cognitions: Levels of cognitive theory and associated methodological requirements. Human Communication Research, 18, 599-622.
50. Weiner, S. L., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977). A move toward a psychology of conversation. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 213-225). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
51. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978.