Exclusion failure does not demonstrate unconscious perception

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 173-204

  Fisk, Gary D ^a   Haase, Steven J ^b  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547254623     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/20445394     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abrams, R. L., Klinger, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Subliminal words activate semantic categories (not automated motor responses). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(1), 100-106.
2. Debner, J. A., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(2), 304-317.
3. Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(3), 286-303.
4. Erdelyi, M. H. (1986). Experimental indeterminacies in the dissociation paradigm of subliminal perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9(1), 30-31.
5. Erdelyi, M. H. (2004). Subliminal perception and its cognates: Theory, indeterminacy, and time. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 73-91.
6. Fisk, G. D., & Haase, S. J. (2005). Unconscious perception or not? An evaluation of detection and discrimination as indicators of awareness. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 183-212.
7. Fisk, G. D., & Haase, S. J. (2006). Exclusion failure does not demonstrate unconscious perception II: Evidence from a forced choice task. Vision Research, 46, 4244-4251.
8. Greenwald, A. G., Klinger, M. R., & Schuh, E. S. (1995). Activation of marginally perceptible ("subliminal") stimuli: Dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 22-42.
9. Haase, S.J., & Fisk, G. (2001). Confidence in word detection predicts word identification: Implications for an unconscious perception paradigm. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 439-468.
10. Haase, S. J., & Fisk, G. D. (2004). Valid distinctions between conscious and unconscious perception? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 868-871.
11. Holender, D. (1986). Semantic activation without conscious identification in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision, and visual masking: A survey and appraisal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 1-66.
12. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
13. Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., & Jennings, J. M. (1997). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. Cohen & J. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 13-47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Kouider, S., & Dupoux, E. (2001). A functional disconnection between spoken and visual word recognition: Evidence from unconscious priming. Cognition, 82, B35-B49.
15. Kouider, S., & Dupoux, E. (2004). Partial awareness creates the "illusion" of subliminal semantic priming. Psychological Science, 15(2), 75-81.
16. Kučera, H., & Francis, N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
17. Merikle, P. M., & Joordens, S. (1997). Measuring unconscious influences. In J. Cohen & J. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 109-123). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Merikle, P. M., Joordens, S., & Stolz, J. A. (1995). Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 422-439.
19. Merikle, P. M., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(2), 224-233.
20. Reingold, E. M. (2004). Unconscious perception and the classic dissociation paradigm: A new angle? Perception & Psychophysics, 66(5), 882-887.
21. Reingold, E. M., & Merikle, P. M. (1988). Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(6), 563-575.
22. Smith, S. D., & Bulman-Fleming, M. B. (2004). A hemispheric asymmetry for the unconscious perception of emotion. Brain and Cognition, 55, 452-457.
23. Snodgrass, M. (2002). Disambiguating conscious and unconscious influences: Do exclusion paradigms demonstrate unconscious perception? American Journal of Psychology, 115, 545-579.
24. Snodgrass, M., Bernat, E., & Shevrin, H. (2004). Unconscious perception: A model-based approach to method and evidence. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 846-867.
25. Visser, T. A. W., & Merikle, P. M. (1999). Conscious and unconscious processes: The effects of motivation. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 94-113.