Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in patients with chronic heart failure

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 277-280

  Leslie, Stephen J ^a,b   McKee, Sinéad ^a   Newby, David E ^a   Webb, David J ^a   Denvir, Martin A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Haemodynamics; Heart failure; Thoracic bioimpedance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE CARDIOGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THERMODILUTION;

AGED; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; HEART FAILURE, CONGESTIVE; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 12344278798     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200410000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Northridge DB, Findlay IN, Wilson J, Henderson E, Dargie HJ. Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance. Br Heart J 1990; 63:93-97.
2. Thomas SHL. Impedance cardiography using the Sramek-Bernstein method: accuracy and validity at rest and during exercise. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 34:467-476.
3. Kööbi T, Kaukinen S, Ahola T, Turjanmaa VMH. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods. Int Care Med 1997; 23:1132-1137.
4. Salandin V, Zussa C, Risica G, Michielon P, Paccagnella A, Cipolotti G, et al. Comparison of cardiac output estimation by thoracic electrical bioimpedance, thermodilution and Fick methods. Crit Care Med 1988; 16:1157-1158.
5. Belardinelli R, Ciampani N, Costantini C, Blandini A, Purcaro A. Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77:1293-1301.
6. Barin E, Haryadi DG, Schokin SI, Westenskow DR, Zubenko VG, Beliaev KR, et al. Evaluation of a thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during cardiac catheterisation. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:698-702.
7. Doering L, Lum E, Dracup K, Friedman A. Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurements using thoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1995; 23:1667-1673.
8. Marik PE, Penelton JE, Smith R. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:1545-1550.
9. Spiering W, Van Es PN, De Leeuw PW. Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution methods for measuring cardiac output. Heart 1998; 79:437-411.
10. Bottiger BW, Soder M, Rauch H, Bohrer H, Motsch J, Bayer H, et al. Semi-continuous versus injectate cardiac output measurements in intensive care patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:312-318.
11. Ditmyer CE, Shively M, Burns DB, Reichman RT. Comparison of continuous with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Am J Crit Care 1995; 4:460-465.
12. Yelderman M. Continuous cardiac output by thermodilution. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1993; 31:127-140.
13. Leslie SJ, Spratt JCS, McKee S, Strachan FE, Newby DE, Northridge DB, et al. Direct Comparison of Selective endothelin ETA and non-selective ETA/B receptor blc in chronic heart failure. Heart 2004; (in press).
14. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical agreement. Lancet 1986; I:307-310.
15. Fuller HD. The validity of cardiac output measurement by thoracic impedance: a meta-analysis. Clin Invest Med 1992; 15:103:122.