Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography for measuring stroke volume and cardiac output

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 603-610

  Schmidt, C ^a   Theilmeier, G ^a   Van Aken, H ^a   Korsmeier, P ^a   Wirtz, S P ^a   Berendes, E ^a   Hoffmeier, A ^a   Meissner, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Measurement techniques, doppler echocardiography; Measurement techniques, thermodilution; Measurement techniques, thoracic impedance cardiography; Measurement techniques, transthoracic electrical impedance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; AORTA VALVE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DATA ANALYSIS; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRICITY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR SYSTEM; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; STANDARD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VELOCITY;

EID: 27744604582     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei224     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Colucci WS, Braunwald E Pathophysiology of heart failure. In: Braunwald E, ed. Heart Disease. A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1997, 394-420
2. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 5-14
3. Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Milo O, Vered Z, Cotter G. Recent developments in cardiac output determination by bioimpedance: Comparison with invasive cardiac output and potential cardiovascular applications. Curr Opin Cardiol 2004; 19: 229-37
4. Poelaert J, Skarvan K. Transoesophageal Echocardiography in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, 2nd edn. London: BMJ Books, 2004
5. Darmon PL, Hillel Z, Mogtader A, Mindich B, Thys D. Cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiography using continuous-wave Doppler across the aortic valve. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 796-805
6. Perrino AC Jr, Harris SN, Luther MA. Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: A comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 350-7
7. Feinberg MS, Hopkins WE, Davila-Roman VG, Barzilai B. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic Doppler imaging accurately determines cardiac output measurements in critically ill patients. Chest 1995; 107: 769-73
8. Katz WE, Gasior TA, Quinlan JJ, Gorcsan J III. Transgastric continuous-wave Doppler to determine cardiac output. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 853-7
9. Poelaert J, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Hinder F, Mollhoff T, Loick HM. A comparison of transoesophageal echocardiographic Doppler across the aortic valve and the thermodilution technique for estimating cardiac output. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 128-36
10. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med 1966; 37: 1208-12
11. Marik P, Pendelton J, Smith R. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography. Chest 1997; 25: 1545-50
12. Fuller HD. The validity of cardiac output measurement by thoracic impedance: A meta-analysis. Clin Invest Med 1992; 15: 103-12
13. Jensen L, Yakimets J, Teo KK. A review of impedance cardiography. Heart Lung 1995; 24: 183-93
14. Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM. A meta-analysis of three decades of validating thoracic impedance cardiography. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 1203-13
15. Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM. A meta-analysis of published studies concerning the validity of thoracic impedance cardiography. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999; 873: 121-7
16. van Grondelle A, Ditchey RV, Groves BM, Wagner WW Jr, Reeves JT. Thermodilution method overestimates low cardiac output in humans. Am J Physiol 1983; 245: H690-2
17. Kubo SH, Burchenal JE, Cody RJ. Comparison of direct Fick and thermodilution cardiac output techniques at high flow rates. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 384-6
18. Strobeck JE, Silver MA. Beyond the four quadrants: The critical and emerging role of impedance cardiography in heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 2004; 10: 1-7
19. Tischenko MI. Estimation of stroke volume by integral rheogram of the human body. Sechenov Physiol J 1973; 59: 1216-24
20. Kubicek WG, Kottke J, Ramos MU et al. The Minnesota impedance cardiograph: Theory and applications. Biomed Eng 1974; 9: 410-16
21. Bernstein DP. A new stroke volume equation for thoracic bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit Care Med 1986; 14: 904-9
22. Richard R, Lonsdorfer-Wolf E, Charloux A et al. Non-invasive cardiac output evaluation during a maximal progressive exercise test, using a new impedance cardiograph device. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001; 85: 202-7
23. Summers RL, Shoemaker WC, Peacock WF, Ander DS, Coleman TG. Bench to bedside: Electrophysiologic and clinical principles of noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring using impedance cardiography. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 669-80
24. Bernstein DP, Osypka MJ. Apparatus and method for determining an approximation of the stroke volume and the cardiac output of the heart. US Patent 6,511,438 B2, January 28, 2003
25. Darmon PL, Hillel Z, Mogtader A, Thys D. A study of human aortic valve orifice by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9: 668-74
26. Shanewise JS, Cheung AT, Aronson S et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination. Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force for Certification in Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 870-84
27. Bland J, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307-10
28. Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit 1999; 15: 85-91
29. Mackenzie JD, Haites NE, Rawles JM. Method of assessing the reproducibility of blood flow measurement: Factors influencing the performance of thermodilution cardiac output computers. Br Heart J 1986; 55: 14-24
30. Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, Raffin TA. Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 126: 1001-4
31. Yung GL, Fedullo PF, Kinninger K, Johnson W, Channick RN. Comparison of impedance cardiography to direct Fick and thermodilution cardiac output in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Congest Heart Fail 2004; 10: 7-10
32. Drazner MH, Thompson B, Rosenberg PB et al. Comparison of impedance cardiography with invasive hemodynamic measurements in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 993-5