Quantitative computer-assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 431-438

  Pitto, R P ^a,c   Mueller, L A ^b   Reilly, K ^a   Schmidt, R ^b   Munro, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BONE DENSITOMETRY; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRUCTURE; CANCELLOUS BONE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; IN VIVO STUDY; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OSTEOPOROSIS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34547113984     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0257-x     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Aamodt A, Kvistad KA, Andersen E (1999) Determination of the Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:143-147
2. Cohen B, Rushton N (1995) Accuracy of DEXA measurement on bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:479-483
3. Engh CA Jr, McAuley J, Sychterz CJ, Sacco ME, Engh CA Sr (2000) The accuracy and reproducibility of radiographic assessment of stress-shielding. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1414-1420
4. Gibbons CE, Davies AJ, Amis AA, Olearnik H, Parker BC, Scott JE (2001) Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy. Int Orthop 25:89-92
5. Kroger H, Venesmaa P, Jurvelin J, Miettinen H, Suomalainen O, Alhava E (1998) Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 352:66-74
6. Laine HJ, Puolakka TJ, Moilanen T, Pajamaki KJ, Wirta J, Lehto MU (2000) The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on 'fit-and-fill' characteristics and on bone remodeling. Int Orthop 24:184-190
7. Leali A, Fetto JF (2004) Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem. Int Orthop 28:151-154
8. Lindgren JU, Svensson O, Mathieson EB (1996) Remodelling and pain after uncemented total hip replacement. Int Orthop 20:7-11
9. Martini F, Sell S, Kremling E, Kusswetter W (1996) Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems. Int Orthop 20:218-221
10. Mirsky EC, Einhorn TA (1998) Bone densitometry in orthopaedic practice. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1687-1698
11. Mow VC, Flatow EL, Foster RJ (1994) Biomechanics. In: Simon SR (ed) Orthopaedic basic science. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Ill.
12. Niinimaki T, Junila J, Jalovaara P (2001) A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. Int Orthop 25:85-88
13. Rosenbaum TG, Bloebaum RD, Ashrafi S, Lester K (2006) Ambulatory activities maintain cortical bone after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res (in press)
14. Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M (1999) Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop 23:325-329
15. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Lewallen DG, Harmsen WS, Harrington J, Cabanela ME (2004) Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem. Int Orthop 28:206-210
16. Schmidt R, Muller L, Kress A, Hirschfelder H, Aplas A, Pitto RP (2002) A computed tomography assessment of femoral and acetabular bone changes after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 26:299-302
17. Schmidt R, Mueller L, Nowak TE, Pitto RP (2003) Clinical outcome and periprosthetic bone remodelling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. Int Orthop 27:204-207
18. Schmidt R, Nowak TE, Mueller L, Pitto RP (2004) Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem. Int Orthop 28:74-77
19. Schmidt R, Pitto RP, Kress A et al (2005) Inter- and Intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. Arch Ortho Trauma Surg 125:291-297
20. Shim V, Pitto RP, Streicher RM, Hunter PJ, Anderson IA (2006) The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating FE models of the femur and pelvis. J Biomech (in press; Epub: Jan 19)
21. Sumner DR, Galante JO (1992) Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Clin Orthop Rel Res 274:202-212
22. Weber D, Pomeroy DL, Brown R, Schaper LA, Badenhausen WE Jr, Smith W, Curry JI, Suthers KE (2000) Proximally porous coated femoral stem in total hip replacement-5- to 13-year follow-up report. Int Orthop 24:97-100
23. Wilkinson JM, Peel NFA, Elson RA, Stockley I, Eastell R (2001) Measuring bone mineral density of the pelvis and proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:283-288
24. Wright JM, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, Ghelman B, Roberts MM, Koh JL (2001) Bone density adjacent to press-fit acetabular components: a prospective analysis with quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:529-533
25. Zerahn B, Storgaard M, Johansen T, Olsen C, Lausten G, Kanstrup IL (1998) Changes in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 22:225-229
26. Zerahn B, Lausten GS, Kanstrup IL (2004) Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems. Int Orthop 28:146-150