Interfacial shear strength of titanium implants in bone is significantly improved by surface topographies with high pit density and microroughness

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 305-312

  Deyneka Dupriez, Nataliya ^a   Kocdemir, Bora ^a   Herr, Ulrich ^a   Fecht, Hans Jörg ^a   Wilke, Hans Joachim ^a   Claes, Lutz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Removal torque; Surface roughness; Surface topography; Surface treatment; Titanium screws

Indexed keywords

BONE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACE TREATMENT; TITANIUM;

MICROROUGHNESS; REMOVAL TORQUE; TITANIUM SCREWS;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

CHLORIDE; NITRIC ACID; SULFURIC ACID; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; IMPLANT; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TORQUE;

ANIMALS; BONE SCREWS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SHEAR STRENGTH; SHEEP; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 34547100522     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30734     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
2. Claes L, Hutzschenreuter P, Pohler O. Lösemomente von corticaliszugschrauben in abhängigkeit von implantationszeit und oberflächenbeschaffenheit. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 1976;85:155-159.
3. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:120-128.
4. Klokkevold PR, Johnson P, Dadgostari S, Caputo A, Davies JE, Nishimura RD. Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:350-357.
5. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575.
6. Wilke H-J, Claes L, Steinemann S.The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heinke G, Soltesz UL, Lee AJC, editors. Clinical Implant Materials, Advances in Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1990. pp 309-314.
7. Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, Buser D. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:325-332.
8. Szmukler-Moncler S, Perrin D, Ahossi V, Magnin G, Bernard JP. Biological properties of acid etched titanium implants: Effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;68:149-159.
9. Szmukler-Moncler S, Testori T, Bernard JP. Etched implants: A comparative surface analysis of four implant systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;69:46-57.
10. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:150-157.
11. Hansson S. Surface roughness parameters as predictors of anchorage strength in bone: A critical analysis. J Biomech 2000;33:1297-1303.
12. Steinemann S, Claes L. Metallic implant anchorable to bone tissue for replacing a broken or diseased bone. US Patent No. 5, 456,723, 1995.
13. Taborelli M, Jobin M, Francois P, Vaudaux P, Tonetti M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Simpson JP, Descouts P. Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium. I. Surface characterization. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:208-216.
14. Bennett JM, Mattsson L. Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering. Washington D.C.: Optical Society of America; 1989.
15. Russ JC. The Image Processing Handbook. Boca Raton: CRC press; 1975.
16. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-344.
17. Hansson S, Norton M. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 1999;32:829-836.