Bench-to-bedside review: Human subjects research - Are more standards needed?

Critical Care

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2006, Pages

  Huang, David T ^a   Hadian, Mehrnaz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PATENT; PATIENT RIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; ETHICS; HISTORY; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 34447649924     PISSN: 13648535     EISSN: 1466609X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/cc5114     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. National Institute of Health NIH funding opportunities and notices http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-06-043.html
2. Rosenthal E When drug trials go horribly wrong International Herald Tribune http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/04/07/news/drug.php 9 April 2006
3. US Government Printing Office The Nuremberg Code Reprinted in: Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office 1949 181-182
4. Michels R Are research ethics bad for our mental health? N Engl J Med 1999 340 1427-1430 10.1056/NEJM199905063401811 10228197
5. Diekema DS Conducting ethical research in pediatric emergency medicine Clin Pediatr Emerg Med 2003 4 273-284 10.1016/S1522-8401(03)00071-5
6. Lantos JD Pediatric research: What is broken and what needs to be fixed? J Pediatr 2004 144 147-149 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.12.026 14760250
7. Wood KA Huang D Angus DC Improving clinical trial design in acute lung injury Crit Care Med 2003 Suppl S305-S311 10.1097/ 01.CCM.0000057908.11686.B3 12682457
8. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects JAMA 1997 277 925-926 10.1001/jama.277.11.925 9062334
9. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office (DHEW publication) 1979
10. Rosenbaum JR Educating researchers: Ethics and protection of human research participants Crit Care Med 2003 Suppl S161-S166 10.1097/ 01.CCM.0000054900.11370.FC 12626962
11. National Institute of Health Required Education in the Protection of Human Research Subjects http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/ NOT-OD-00-039.html
12. Seto B Required education on the protection of human subjects: An NIH initiative Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2001 11 87-90 10.1353/ken.2001.0007 12166447
13. Stolberg SG The biotech death of Jesse Gelsinger NY Times Magazine 1999 28 136-150
14. Wade N Death leads to concerns for future of gene therapy NY Times 1999 30 September A22
15. Angell M Is academic medicine for sale? N Engl J Med 2000 342 1516-1518 10.1056/NEJM200005183422009 10816191
16. Shalala D Protecting research subjects: What must be done? N Engl J Med 2000 343 808-810 10.1056/NEJM200009143431112 10984573
17. Kodish E Informed consent for pediatric research: Is it really possible? J Pediatr 2003 142 89-90 10.1067/mpd.2003.64 12584521
18. Naarden AL Informed consent Am J Med 2006 119 194-197 10.1016/ j.amjmed.2005.10.040 16490461
19. Karlawish JHT Research involving cognitive impaired adults N Engl J Med 2003 348 1389-1392 10.1056/NEJMsb030172 12672869
20. Silverman HJ Luce JM Lanken PN Morris AH Harabin AL Oldmixon CF Thompson BT Bernard GR Recommendations for informed consent forms for critical care clinical trials Crit Care Med 2005 33 867-882 10.1097/ 01.CCM.0000159201.08203.10 15818118
21. Ellensberg SS Informed consent: Protection or obstacle? Control Clin Trials 1997 18 628-636 10.1016/S0197-2456(96)00130-4 9408725
22. Kim SYH Kim HM McCallum C Tariot PN What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research? Neurology 2005 65 1395-1401 10.1212/01.wnl.0000183144.61428.73 16275826
23. Coppolino M Ackerson L Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research? Chest 2001 119 603-612 10.1378/ chest.119.2.603 11171743
24. Luce JM Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients? Crit Care Med 2003 Suppl 3 S153-S160 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054901.80339.01 12626961
25. Biros MH Research without consent: Current status, 2003 Ann Emerg Med 2003 42 550-564 10.1067/S0196-0644(03)00490-6 14520326
26. Department of Health and Human Services Protection of human subjects: informed consent and waiver of consent requirements in certain emergency research: Final rules Federal Register 1996 October 51500-51533
27. Brios MH Runge JW Lewis RJ Emergency medicine and the development of the FDA's final rule on informed consent and waiver of informed consent in emergency research circumstances Acad Emerg Med 1998 5 359-368 9562204
28. Lurie K Benditt D Regulated to death: The matter of informed consent for human experimentation in emergency research Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995 18 1443-1447 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02607.x 7567598
29. Abramson NS Meisel A Safar P Deferred consent: A new approach for resuscitation research on comatose patients JAMA 1986 255 2466-2471 10.1001/jama.255.18.2466 3701965
30. Holmes DR Firth B James A Winslow R Hodgson PK Gamble GL Popp RL Harrington RA Conflict of interest Am Heart J 2004 147 228-237 10.1016/ j.ahj.2003.12.001 14760318
31. Campbell EG Weissman JS Clarridge B Yucel R Causino N Blumenthal D Characteristics of faculty serving on IRBs: Research of a national survey of medical school faculty Acad Med 2003 78 831-837 10.1097/ 00001888-200308000-00019 12915379
32. Bekelman JE Li Y Gross CP Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systemic review JAMA 2003 289 454-465 10.1001/jama.289.4.454 12533125
33. Ghersi D The future of institutional review boards Lancet Oncol 2004 4 325-329 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01473-1 15120672
34. Paasche-Orlow MK Brancati FL Assessment of medical school institutional review board policies regarding compensation of subjects for research-related injury Am J Med 2005 118 175-180 10.1016/ j.amjmed.2004.03.045 15694904
35. NIH NIH announces final ethics rules Ban on outside consulting with industry remains in force NIH News 2005 August 25 http://www.nih.gov/ news/pr/aug2005/od-25.htm
36. Hey E Chalmers L Are any of the criticisms of the CNEP trial true? Lancet 2006 367 1032-1033 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68445-6 16581384
37. Southall DP Samuel MP CNEP needs to return Lancet 2006 367 1033-1035 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68446-8 16581385
38. Craft AW McIntosh N Southall and colleagues vindicated once more Lancet 2006 367 1035-1037 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68447-X 16581386
39. Abelson R Hospitals see possible conflict on medical devices for doctors New York Times 2005 22 September 1
40. Eichenwald K Kolata G Drug trials hide conflicts for doctors New York Times 1999 16 May 1
41. Silverman H Hull SC Sugarman J Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a muti-center trial Crit Care Med 2001 29 235-241 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00002 11246299
42. Shah S Whittle A Wilfond B Gensler G Wendler D How do IRBs apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatrics research? JAMA 2004 291 476-482 10.1001/jama.291.4.476 14747505
43. Office of Inspector General Institutional Review Boards: Their Role in Reviewing Approved Research Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office 1998
44. Vick CC Finan KR Kiefe C Neumayer L Hawn MT Variation in Institutional Review processes for a multisite observational study Am J Surg 2005 190 805-809 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.024 16226962
45. Wendler D Emanuel EJ What is a 'minor' increase over minimal risk? J Pediatr 2005 147 575-578 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.07.013 16291344
46. Gilman RH Garcia HH Ethics review procedures for research in developing countries: A basic presumption of guilt CMAJ 2004 171 248-249 490076 15289424
47. Burman WJ Reves RR Cohn DL Schooley RT Breaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards Am Intern Med 2001 134 152-157 11177319
48. Wolf LE Walden JF Lo B Human subjects issues and IRB review in practice-based research Ann Fam Med 2005 Suppl S30-S37 10.1370/afm.302 15928216 1466958
49. Kofke WA Rie MA Research ethics and law of healthcare system quality improvement: The conflict of cost containment and quality Crit Care Med 2003 Suppl S143-S152 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054902.85329.50 12626960
50. Strasberg SM Ludbrook PA Who oversees innovative practice? Is there a structire that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques? J Am Coll Surg 2003 196 938-948 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00112-1 12788432
51. Reitsma AM Moreno JD Ethics of innovative surgery: US Surgeons' definition, knowledge, and attitudes J Am Coll Surg 2005 200 103-110 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.032 15631926
52. Kristjanson LJ Hanson EJ Balneaves L Research in palliative care populations: Ethical issues J Palliat Care 1994 10 10-15 7531225
53. Krouse RS Easson AM Angelos P Ethical considerations and barriers to research in surgical palliative care J Am Coll Surg 2003 196 469-474 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01890-2 12648701
54. Kasa S De Conno F Palliative care research Eur J Cancer 2001 37 S153-S159 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00260-X 11602381
55. McCullough LB Coverdale JH Chervenak FA A comprehensive ethical framework for responsibly designing and conducting pharmacologic research that involves pregnant women Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005 193 901-907 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.020 16157085
56. Reitsma AM Moreno JD Meternal-fetal research and human research protections policy Clin Perinatol 2003 30 141-153 10.1016/ S0095-5108(02)00079-9 12696792
57. Moore V The Regents of the University of California 271 Cal Rptr 1436 793 2nd 479 (Cal 1990)
58. Skloot R Taking the least of you New York Times 2006 http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/magazine/16tissue.html?ex= 1166072400&en=2dbbceb4d90c4731&ei=5070
59. Kaiser J Court decides tissue samples belong to university, not patients Science Magazine 2006 312 5772
60. Wendler D Foster H Why we need legal standards for pediatric research J Pediatr 2004 144 150-153 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.10.033 14760251
61. Truog RD Robinson W Randolph A Morris A Is informed consent always necessary for randomized controlled trials? N Engl J Med 1999 340 804-807 10.1056/NEJM199903113401013 10072420
62. Truog RD will ethical requirements bring critical care research to a halt? Intensive Care Med 2005 31 338-344 10.1007/s00134-004-2480-5 15526188
63. Weijer C Miller PB When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits? Nat Med 2004 10 570-573 10.1038/nm0604-570 15170195
64. Emanuel EJ Institutional review board reform N Engl J Med 2002 347 1285-1286 10.1056/NEJM200210173471620 12393832
65. Christian MC Goldberg JL Killen J Abrams JS McCabe MS Mauer JK Wittes RE A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials N Engl J Med 2002 346 1405-1408 10.1056/NEJM200205023461814 11986418
66. National Cancer Institute The Central Institutional Review Board http://www.ncicirb.org
67. Multicenter Academic Clinical Research Organization (MACRO) Website http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/ctc/macro.html
68. US Food and Drug Administration Additional safeguards for children in clinical investigations of FDA-regulated products http://www.fda.gov/ ohrms/dockets/98fr/042401a.htm
69. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc 782 A.2d 807 (Md Ct of App 2001, reconsideration denied, Oct. 11, 2001)
70. Beecher HK Ethics and clinical research N Engl J Med 1966 274 1354-1360 5327352