Conducting ethical research in pediatric emergency medicine

Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 273-284

  Diekema, Douglas S ^a  

^a SEATTLE CHILDREN S RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; EMERGENCY WARD; FAMILY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT CARE; PEDIATRICS; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0346007959     PISSN: 15228401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1522-8401(03)00071-5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lederer SE, Grodin MA: Historical overview: Pediatric experimentation, in Glanz LH (ed): Children as Research Subjects: Science, Ethics & Law. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 3-25.
2. Grodin MA: Historical origins of the Nuremberg Code, in Annas GJ, Grodin MA (eds): The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 121-144.
3. Permissible medical experiments: Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10: Nuremberg, October 1946-1949. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1949, pp. 181-182.
4. World Medical Association: Recommendations guiding medical doctors in biomedical research involving human subjects. Helsinki, 18th World Assembly, 1964. Revised 52nd WMA World General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, 2000.
5. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Report and Recommendations: Research Involving Children. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office (DHEW publication), 1977.
6. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research: The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office (DHEW publication), 1979.
7. Ramsey P: Research involving children or incompetents, in: The Patient as Person: Explorations in Medical Ethics. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1970, pp. 11-19.
8. US Department of Health and Human Services. Protection of Human Subjects. 45 CFR 46, 1991.
9. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C: What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283:2701-2711, 2000.
10. Mish FC (ed): Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, MA, Merriam-Webster Inc., 1990.
11. Casarett DJ, Karlawish JHT, Moreno JD: A taxonomy of value in clinical research. IRB 24:1-6, 2002.
12. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Ethics Advisory Committee: Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Arch Dis Child 82:177-182, 2000.
13. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences: International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva, Switzerland. CIOMS, 1993.
14. Halpern SD, Karlawish JHT, Berlin JA: The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. JAMA 288:358-362, 2002.
15. Ross LF, Newberger JW, Sanders SP: Ethical issues in pediatric trials. Am Heart J 142:233-236, 2001.
16. McCarthy AM, Richman LC, Hoffman RP, et al: Psychological screening of children for participation in nontherapeutic invasive research. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 155: 1197-1203, 2001.
17. US Department of Health and Human Services. Protection of Human Subjects. Subpart D-Additional DHHS Protections for Children Involved as Subjects in Research. 45 CFR 46, 1991.
18. Tarnowaski KJ, Allen DM, Mayhall C, et al: Readability of pediatrics biomedical research informed consent forms. Pediatrics 85:58-62, 1990.
19. Waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research. Federal Register 61:51531-51533, 1996.
20. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association: Waiver of informed consent for research in emergency situations. Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations (2002-2003 Edition). Chicago, IL, AMA Press, 2002, pp 212-213.
21. Weithorn LA: Children's capacity to decide about participation in research. IRB 5:1-5, 1983.
22. Denham EJ, Nelson RM: Self-determination is not an appropriate model for understanding parental permission and child asssent. Anesth Analg 94:1049-1051, 2002.
23. Leikin S: Minors' assent, or dissent to medical research. IRB 15:1-7, 1993.
24. Klein JE, Fleischman AR: The private practicing physician-investigator: Ethical implications of clinical research in the office setting: Hastings Center Report 32:22-26, 2002.
25. Churchill L: Physician-investigator/patient-subject: Exploring the logic and the tension. J Med Philosophy 5:215-224, 1980.
26. Levine RJ: Clinical trials and physicians as double agents. Yale J Biol Med 65:65-74, 1992.
27. National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee: Recommendations on confidentiality and research data protections. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Human Research Protections. Available at: http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/nhrpac/documents/nhrpac14.pdf. Accessed February 26, 2003.
28. Partridge AH, Winer EP: Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA 288:363-365, 2002.
29. Wendler D, Rackoff J, Emanuel EJ, et al: The Ethics of paying for children's participation in research. J Pediatr 141:166-171, 2002.
30. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Drugs: Guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric populations. Pediatrics 95:286-294, 1995.
31. Fernhoff PM: Paying for children to participate in research: A slippery slope or an enlightened stairway? J Pediatr 141:153-154, 2002.