Ethics review procedures for research in developing countries: A basic presumption of guilt

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 171, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 248-249

  Gilman, Robert H ^a,b,c   Garcia, Hector H ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA   (Peru)

^c ASOCIACIÓN BENÉFICA PRISMA   (Peru)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST CONTROL; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GUILT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4043134573     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1031121     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Western medical journals and the 10/90 problem [editorial]. CMAJ 2004;170(1):5.
2. UNESCO Institute of Statistics. The state of science and technology in the world, 1996-7. Paris: UNESCO Institute of Statistics; 2001.
3. Gambia Government / Medical Research Council Joint Ethical Committee. Ethical issues facing medical research in developing countries. Lancet 1998;351:286-7.
4. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical and policy issues in international research: clinical trials in developing countries. Vol I. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Bethesda: The Commission; 2001. p. 138.
5. Gilman RH, Anderton C, Kosek M, Garcia HH, Evans CA. How many committees does it take to make a project ethical? Lancet 2002;60:1025-6.
6. McWilliams R, Hoover-Fong J, Hamosh A, Beck S, Beaty T, Cutting G. Problematic variation in a local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study. JAMA 2003;290:360-6.
7. Beyer DR, Lauer MS, Davis S. Readability of informed consent forms. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2262.
8. Steinbrook R. Protecting research subjects: the crisis at Johns Hopkins. N Engl J Med 2002;346:716-20.