Evidence of a tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex in cochlear implant users

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 27, Issue 29, 2007, Pages 7838-7846

  Guiraud, Jeanne ^a,c,e   Besle, Julien ^b,e   Arnold, Laure ^d   Boyle, Patrick ^d   Giard, Marie Hélène ^b,e   Bertrand, Olivier ^b,e   Norena, Arnaud ^a,e   Truy, Eric ^a,c,e   Collet, Lionel ^a,c,e  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Advanced Bionics UK Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Cortical tonotopy; Modeling; N1 topography; Pitch perception; Plasticity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIPOLE; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; SENSORY STIMULATION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; TONOTOPY; TOPOGRAPHY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME;

EID: 34447621775     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 02706474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0154-07.2007     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bertrand O, Perrin F, Echallier JF and Pernier J (1988) Topography and model analysis of auditory evoked potentials: tonotopic aspects. In: Functional brain imaging (Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva FH, eds) pp 75-82. Toronto: Hans Huber.
2. Bertrand O, Perrin F, Pernier J (1991) Evidence for a tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex observed with auditory evoked potentials. Acta Otolaryngol [Suppl] 491:116-122; discussion 123.
3. Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC (2002) Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. J Neurophysiol 87:478-492.
4. Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, Parisi ES, Clark GM (1996) Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations. Hear Res 99:139-150.
5. Busby PA, Tong YC, Clark GM (1993) Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 93:1058-1067.
6. Dietrich V, Nieschalk M, Stoll W, Rajan R, Pantev C (2001) Cortical reorganization in patients with high frequency cochlear hearing loss. Hear Res 158:95-101.
7. Donaldson GS, Nelson DA (2000) Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. J Acoust Soc Am 107:1645-1658.
8. Dorman MF, Smith M, Smith L, Parkin JL (1994) The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids. J Acoust Soc Am 95:1677-1679.
9. Elberling C, Bak C, Kofoed B, Lebech J, Saermark K (1982) Auditory magnetic fields from the human cerebral cortex: location and strength of an equivalent current dipole. Acta Neurol Scand 65:553-569.
10. Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Kraus, Reeder RM (2002) Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response. Ear Hear 23:502-515.
11. Formisano E, Kim DS, Di Salle F, van de Moortele PF, Ugurbil K, Goebel R (2003) Mirror-symmetric tonotopic maps in human primary auditory cortex. Neuron 40:859-869.
12. Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Slattery III WH (1999) The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant. Am J Otol 20:729-734.
13. Gabriel D, Veuillet E, Ragot R, Schwartz D, Ducorps A, Norena A, Durrant JD, Bonmartin A, Cotton F, Collet L (2004) Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex. Hear Res 197:55-64.
14. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV (2004) Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Ear Hear 25:447-463.
15. Guiraud J, Gallego S, Arnold L, Boyle P, Truy E, Collet L (2007) Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses. Hear Res, in press.
16. Hari R (1990) Magnetic evoked fields of the human brain: basic principles and applications. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol [Suppl] 41:3-12.
17. Henry BA, McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM (2000) The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 108:1269-1280.
18. Irvine DR (2000) Injury- and use-related plasticity in the adult auditory system. J Commun Disord 33:293-311; quiz 311-292.
19. Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Segel P, Kessler D (2004) HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Audiol Neurootol 9:214-223.
20. Lafon JC (1964) Le test phonétique et la mesure de l'audition. Eindhoven: Centrex.
21. Larsen JP, Odegaard H, Grude TH, Hoien T (1989) Magnetic resonance imaging - a method of studying the size and asymmetry of the planum temporale. Acta Neurol Scand 80:438-443.
22. Lazeyras F, Boex C, Sigrist A, Seghier ML, Cosendai G, Terrier F, Pelizzone M (2002) Functional MRI of auditory cortex activated by multisite electrical stimulation of the cochlea. NeuroImage 17:1010-1017.
23. Liegeois-Chauvel C, Giraud K, Badier JM, Marquis P, Chauvel P (2001) Intracerebral evoked potentials in pitch perception reveal a functional asymmetry of the human auditory cortex. Ann NY Acad Sci 930:117-132.
24. Lütkenhöner B (2003) Magnetoencephalography and its Achilles' heel. J Physiol (Paris) 97:641-658.
25. Medwick PA, Lewis PS, Aine C, Flynn FR (1989) Monte Carlo analysis of localization errors in magnetoencephalography. In: Advances in Biomagnetism (Williamson SJ, Hoke M, Stroink G, eds), pp 543-546. New York: Plenum.
26. Melcher JR, Eddington DK, Gracia N, Qin M, Sroka J, Weisskoff RM (1998) Electrically evoked cortical activity in cochlear implant subjects can be mapped using fMRI. NeuroImage 7:S385.
27. Merzenich MM, White MW, Leake PA, Schindler RA, Michelson RP (1977) Further progress in the development of multichannel cochlear implants. Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 84:181-182.
28. Middlebrooks JC, Bierer JA (2002) Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. J Neurophysiol 87:493-507.
29. Näätänen R, Picton T (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24:375-425.
30. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lutkenhoner B, Anogianakis G, Wittkowski W (1988) Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 69:160-170.
31. Pantev C, Bertrand O, Eulitz C, Verkindt C, Hampson S, Schuierer G, Elbert T (1995) Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 94:26-40.
32. Pantev C, Ross B, Berg P, Elbert T, Rockstroh B (1998) Study of the human auditory cortices using a whole-head magnetometer: left vs right hemisphere and ipsilateral vs contralateral stimulation. Audiol Neurootol 3:183-190.
33. Perrin F, Bertrand O, Giard MH, Pernier J (1990) Precautions in topographic mapping and in evoked potential map reading. J Clin Neurophysiol 7:498-506.
34. Ponton CW, Don M (1995) The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 16:131-146.
35. Ponton CW, Don M, Waring MD, Eggermont JJ, Masuda A (1993) Spatio-temporal source modeling of evoked potentials to acoustic and cochlear implant stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88:478-493.
36. Raggio MW, Schreiner CE (1999) Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. III. Activation patterns in short- and long-term deafness. J Neurophysiol 82:3506-3526.
37. Raggio MW, Schreiner CE (2003) Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation: IV. Activation pattern for sinusoidal stimulation. J Neurophysiol 89:3190-3204.
38. Ritter M, Simson R, Vaughan HG (1972) Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 33:547-555.
39. Rosburg T, Haueisen J, Sauer H (2002) Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m. Brain Topogr 15:37-41.
40. Rush S, Driscoll DA (1969) EEG electrode sensitivity - an application of reciprocity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 16:15-22.
41. Scherg M (1990) Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: Auditory evoked magnetic fields and electrical potentials. Advances in audiology (Grandori F, Hoke M, Romani GL, eds), pp 40-69. Basel: Karger.
42. Seghier ML, Boex C, Lazeyras F, Sigrist A, Pelizzone M (2005) FMRI evidence for activation of multiple cortical regions in the primary auditory cortex of deaf subjects users of multichannel cochlear implants. Cereb Cortex 15:40-48.
43. Shepherd RK, Hardie NA (2001) Deafness-induced changes in the auditory pathway: implications for cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 6:305-318.
44. Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ, Cao KL, Leake PA, Kelly K (1990) Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation. Hear Res 50:7-33.
45. Snyder RL, Rebscher SJ, Leake PA, Kelly K, Cao K (1991) Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II. Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus. Hear Res 56:246-264.
46. Spahr AJ, Dorman MF (2004) Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:624-628.
47. Stok CJ, Meijs JW, Peters MJ (1987) Inverse solutions based on MEG and EEG applied to volume conductor analysis. Phys Med Biol 32:99-104.
48. Strainer JC, Ulmer JL, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Daniels DL, Millen SJ. (1997) Functional MR of the primary auditory cortex: an analysis of pure tone activation and tone discrimination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:601-610.
49. Talavage TM, Sereno MI, Melcher JR, Ledden PJ, Rosen BR, Dale AM (2004) Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity. J Neurophysiol 91:1282-1296.
50. Thai-Van H, Micheyl C, Norena A, Collet L (2002a) Local improvement in auditory frequency discrimination is associated with hearing-loss slope in subjects with cochlear damage. Brain 125:524-537.
51. Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RL (1987) Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 82:106-115.
52. Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Clark GM (2000) Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 21:608-624.
53. Verkindt C, Bertrand O, Perrin F, Echallier JF, Pernier J (1995) Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex: N100 topography and multiple dipole model analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96:143-156.