Magnetoencephalography and its Achilles' heel

Journal of Physiology Paris

Volumn 97, Issue 4-6, 2003, Pages 641-658

  Lütkenhöner, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beamformer; Current dipole; Magnetoencephalography; Resolution field; Spatial resolution

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; BRAIN REGION; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIPOLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; INTEGRATION; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TOPOGRAPHY;

BRAIN; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 1842611412     PISSN: 09284257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.01.020     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. Backus G.E., Gilbert F. Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A. 266:1970;123-192.
2. Baillet S., Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18(6):2001;14-30.
3. Bradshaw L.A., Wijesinghe R.S., Wikswo J.P. Jr. Spatial filter approach for comparison of the forward and inverse problems of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 29:2001;214-226.
4. Bronshtein I.N., Semendyayev K.A. Handbook of Mathematics. third ed. 1985;Van Nostrand Reinhold.
5. Cohen D., Cuffin B.N. Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56:1983;38-51.
6. Cuffin B.N., Cohen D. Magnetic fields produced by models of biological current sources. J. Appl. Phys. 48:1977;3971-3980.
7. Curio G., Mackert B.M., Burghoff M., Neumann J., Nolte G., Scherg M., Marx P. Somatotopic source arrangement of 600 Hz oscillatory magnetic fields at the human primary somatosensory hand cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 234:1997;131-134.
8. Dale A.M., Halgren E. Spatiotemporal mapping of brain activity by integration of multiple imaging modalities. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11:2001;202-208.
9. Flynn E.R. Factors which affect spatial resolving power in large array biomagnetic sensors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65:1994;922-935.
10. W.J. Freeman, A software lens for image reconstruction of the EEG, in: H.H. Kornhuber, L. Deecke (Eds.), Motivation, Motor and Sensory Processes of the Brain: Electrical Potentials, Behaviour and Clinical Use, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 123-127.
11. Freeman W.J. Use of spatial deconvolution to compensate for distortion of EEG by volume conduction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 27:1980;421-429.
12. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Gonzalez Andino S.L. Backus and Gilbert method for vector fields. Human Brain Mapping. 7:1999;161-165.
13. Grave de Peralta Menendez R., Hauk O., Gonzalez Andino S., Vogt H., Michel C.M. Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography. Human Brain Mapping. 5:1997;454-467.
14. Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography - theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65:1993;413-497.
15. Hari R., Joutsiniemi S.L., Sarvas J. Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 71:1988;64-72.
16. Helmholtz H. Ueber einige Gesetze der Vertheilung elektrischer Ströme in körperlichen Leitern mit Anwendung auf die thierisch-elektrischen Versuche. Ann. Phys. Chem. 89:1853;211-233. 353-377.
17. Ikeda H., Leyba L., Bartolo A., Wang Y., Okada Y.C. Synchronized spikes of thalamocortical axonal terminals and cortical neurons are detectable outside the pig brain with MEG. J. Neurophysiol. 87:2002;626-630.
18. Jerbi K., Mosher J.C., Baillet S., Leahy R.M. On MEG forward modelling using multipolar expansions. Phys. Med. Biol. 47:2002;523-555.
19. Kandel E.R., Schwartz J.H. Directly gated transmission at central synapses. Kandel E.R., Schwartz J.H., Jessell T.M. Principles of Neural Science. 1991;153-172 Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT.
20. Koenig T., Prichep L., Lehmann D., Valdes Sosa P., Braeker E., Kleinlogel H., Isenhart R., John E.R. Millisecond by millisecond, year by year: normative EEG microstates and developmental stages. Neuroimage. 16:2002;41-48.
21. Krim H., Viberg M. Two decades of array signal processing research. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 13:1996;67-94.
22. Lehmann D., Strik W.K., Henggeler B., Koenig T., Koukkou M. Brain electric microstates and momentary conscious mind states as building blocks of spontaneous thinking: I. Visual imagery and abstract thoughts. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 29:1998;1-11.
23. Liu A.K., Dale A.M., Belliveau J.W. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Human Brain Mapping. 16:2002;47-62.
24. Lo Re V. 3rd, Bellini L.M. William of Occam and Occam's razor. Ann. Intern. Med. 136:2002;634-635.
25. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., Augath M., Trinath T., Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 412:2001;150-157.
26. Lütkenhöner B. Current dipole localization with an ideal magnetometer system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43:1996;1049-1061.
27. Lütkenhöner B. Dipole separability in a neuromagnetic source analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45:1998;572-581.
28. Lütkenhöner B. Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation: I. Theory and simulations. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106:1998;314-321.
29. Lütkenhöner B. Magnetic field arising from current dipoles randomly distributed in a homogeneous spherical volume conductor. J. Appl. Phys. 75:1994;7204-7210.
30. B. Lütkenhöner, On the biomagnetic inverse procedure's capability of separating two current dipoles with a priori known locations, in: M. Hoke, S.N. Ernè, Y.C. Okada, G.L. Romani (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 687-692.
31. B. Lütkenhöner, Some statistical aspects of magnetoencephalography, in: M. Moore (Ed.), Spatial Statistics: Methodological Aspects and Applications, New York, 2001, pp. 213-245.
32. Lütkenhöner B., Grave de Peralta Menendez R. The resolution-field concept. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 102:1997;326-334.
33. B. Lütkenhöner, R.E. Greenblatt, M. Hämäläinen, J.C. Mosher, M. Scherg, C. Tesche, P. Valdes Sosa, Comparison between different approaches to the biomagnetic inverse problem: workshop report, in: C.J. Aine, Y. Okada, G. Stroink, S.J. Swithenby, C.C. Wood (Eds.), Biomag96, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Biomagnetism, vol. I, New York, 2000, pp. 163-176.
34. Lütkenhöner B., Pantev C., Hoke M. Interpretation of auditory evoked magnetic fields in terms of two simultaneously active dipoles. Biomed. Res. 13(Suppl. 1):1992;17-22.
35. Malmivuo J., Plonsey R. Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields. 1995;Oxford University Press.
36. Martin J.H. The collective electrical behavior of cortical neurons: the electroencephalogram and the mechanisms of epilepsy. Kandel E.R., Schwartz J.H., Jessell T.M. Principles of Neural Science. 1991;777-791 Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT.
37. Menke W. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. 1984;Academic Press.
38. Menninghaus E., Lütkenhöner B. How silent are deep and radial sources in neuromagnetic measurements? Baumgartner C., Deecke L., Stroink G., Williamson S.J. Biomagnetism: Fundamental Research and Clinical Applications. 1995;352-356 IOS Press, Amsterdam.
39. Mitzdorf U., Singer W. Excitatory synaptic ensemble properties in the visual cortex of the macaque monkey: a current source density analysis of electrically evoked potentials. J. Comp. Neurol. 187:1979;71-83.
40. Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M. Recursive MUSIC: a framework for EEG and MEG source localization. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45:1998;1342-1354.
41. Mosher J.C., Leahy R.M. Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) music. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 47:1999;332-340.
42. Mosher J.C., Spencer M.E., Leahy R.M., Lewis P.S. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 86:1993;303-321.
43. Nolte G., Curio G. Current multipole expansion to estimate lateral extent of neuronal activity: a theoretical analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47:2000;1347-1355.
44. Nolte G., Curio G. On the calculation of magnetic fields based on multipole modeling of focal biological current sources. Biophys. J. 73:1997;1253-1262.
45. Orrison W.W. Jr. Magnetic source imaging in stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 72:1999;89-94.
46. Robinson S.E. Theory and properties of lead field synthesis analysis. Williamson S.J., Hoke M., Stroink G., Kotani M. Advances in Biomagnetism. 1989;599-602 Plenum Press, New York.
47. S.E. Robinson, D.F. Rose, Current source image estimation by spatially filtered MEG, in: M. Hoke, S.N. Ernè, Y.C. Okada, G.L. Romani (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 761-765.
48. Robinson S.E., Vrba J. Functional neuroimaging by synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM). Yoshimoto T., Kotani M., Kuriki S., Karibe H., Nakasato N. Recent Advances in Biomagnetism. 1999;302-305 Tohoku University Press, Sendai.
49. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 32:1987;11-22.
50. Schroeder C.E., Mehta A.D., Givre S.J. A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. Cereb. Cortex. 8:1998;575-592.
51. Sekihara K., Nagarajan S.S., Poeppel D., Marantz A., Miyashita Y. Application of an MEG eigenspace beamformer to reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources. Human Brain Mapping. 15:2002;199-215.
52. Sekihara K., Ogura Y., Hotta M. Maximum-likelihood estimation of current-dipole parameters for data obtained using multichannel magnetometer. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:1992;558-562.
53. Speckmann E.J., Walden J. Mechanisms underlying the generation of cortical field potentials. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 491:1991;17-23.
54. Supek S., Aine C.J. Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40:1993;529-540.
55. Supek S., Aine C.J. Spatio-temporal modeling of neuromagnetic data: I. Multi-source location versus time-course estimation accuracy. Human Brain Mapping. 5:1997;139-153.
56. Tan S., Roth B.J., Wikswo J.P. The magnetic field of cortical current sources: the application of a spatial filtering model to the forward and inverse problems. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 76:1990;73-85.
57. Tesche C.D., Uusitalo M.A., Ilmoniemi R.J., Huotilainen M., Kajola M., Salonen O. Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95:1995;189-200.
58. Van Veen B.D., Buckley K.M. Beamforming: A versatile approach to spatial filtering. IEEE ASSP Mag. 5:1988;4-24.
59. Van Veen B.D., van Drongelen W., Yuchtman M., Suzuki A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44:1997;867-880.
60. Vrba J., Robinson S.E. Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. Methods. 25:2001;249-271.
61. Wikswo J.P., Roth B.J. Magnetic determination of the spatial extent of a single cortical current source: a theoretical analysis. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69:1988;266-276.
62. Wildner M. In memory of William of Occam. Lancet. 354:1999;2172.
63. S.J. Williamson, L. Kaufman, Analysis of neuromagnetic signals, in: A.S. Gevins, A. Remond (Eds.), Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals, EEG Handbook (Revised Series, vol. I), Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 405-448.
64. S.J. Williamson, L. Kaufman, Theory of neuroelectric and neuromagnetic fields, in: F. Grandori, M. Hoke, G.L. Romani (Eds.), Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials, Basel, 1990, pp. 1-39.