Erratum: Nature of the transition between two modes of external space perception in tilted subjects (Journal of Neurophysiology (June 2005) 93 (3356-3369) DOI: 10.1152/jn.01137.2004);Nature of the transition between two modes of external space perception in tilted subjects

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 3356-3369

  Kaptein, Ronald G ^a   Van Gisbergen, Jan A M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DARK ADAPTATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; GRAVITY; HEAD POSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYSTERESIS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 19344368377     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00719.2005     Document Type: Erratum

References (26)

1. Anastasopoulos D and Bronstein AM. A case of thalamic syndrome: somatosensory influences on visual orientation. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry 67: 390-394, 1999.
2. Bronstein AM, Yardley L, Moore AP, and Cleeves L. Visually and posturally mediated tilt illusion in Parkinson disease and in labyrinthine defective subjects. Neurology 47: 651-656, 1996.
3. Eggert T. Der Einfluss orientierter Texturen auf die subjektive Vertikale und seine systemtheoretische Analyse (PhD thesis). Munich, Germany: Munich Technical University, 1998.
4. Fischer MH. Messende Untersuchungen über die Gegenrollung der Augen und die Lokalisation der scheinbaren Vertikalen bei seitlicher Neigung des Gesamtkörpers bis zu 360°. Graefes Arch Opthal 123: 476-508, 1930.
5. Hartigan JA and Hartigan PM. The dip test of unimodality. Ann Statist 13: 70-84, 1985.
6. Hartigan PM. Computation of the dip statistic to test for unimodality. Appl Statist 34: 320-325, 1985.
7. Howard IP. Visual Orientation to Gravity. New York: Wiley, 1982.
8. Howard IP. The perception of posture, self motion, and the visual vertical. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, edited by Boff. KR, Kaufman L, and Thomas JP. New York: Wiley, 1986, p. 1-50.
9. Jaggi-Schwarz K and Hess BJM. Influence of dynamic tilts on the perception of earth-vertical. Exp Brain Res 149: 340-350, 2003.
10. Jaggi-Schwarz K, Ortega M, and Hess BJM. Reciprocal error behaviour in estimated body position and subjective visual vertical. Exp Brain Res 150: 122-125, 2003.
11. Kaptein RG and Van Gisbergen JAM. Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt. J Neurophysiol 91: 2205-2214, 2004.
12. Keusch S, Hess BJ, and Jaggi-Schwarz K. Direction specific error patterns during continuous tracking of the subjective visual vertical. Exp Brain Res 155: 283-290, 2004.
13. Mast FW, Berthoz A, and Kosslyn SM. Mental imagery of visual motion modifies the perception of roll-vection stimulation. Perception 30: 945-957, 2001.
14. Mittelstaedt H. A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical. Naturwissenschaften 70: 272-281, 1983.
15. Pavlou M, Wijnberg N, Faldon ME, and Bronstein AM. Effect of semicircular canal stimulation on the perception of the visual vertical. J Neurophysiol 90: 622-630, 2003.
16. Pettorossi VE, Errico P, Ferraresi A, and Barmack NH. Optokinetic and vestibular stimulation determines the spatial orientation or negative optokinetic afternystagmus in the rabbit. J Neurosci 19: 1524-1531, 1999.
17. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, and Vettering WT. Numerical Recipes in C (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, 1992.
18. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2004.
19. Schöne H. On the role of gravity in human spatial orientation. Aerospace Medicine 35: 764-772, 1964.
20. Udo de Haes HA. Stability of apparent vertical and ocular countertorsion as a function of lateral tilt. Percept Psychophys 8: 137-142, 1970.
21. Udo de Haes HA and Schöne H. Interaction between statolith organs and semicircular canals on apparent vertical and nystagmus. Acta Otolaryngol 69: 25-31, 1970.
22. Van Beuzekom AD, Medendorp WP, and Van Gisbergen JAM. The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt. Vision Res 41: 3229-3242, 2001.
23. Van Beuzekom AD and Van Gisbergen JAM. Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. J Neurophysiol 84: 11-27, 2000.
24. Wertheim AH, Mesland BS, and Bles W. Cognitive suppresion of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark. Perception 30: 733-741, 2001.
25. Wichmann FA and Hill NJ. The psychometric function. I. Fitting, sampling and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63: 1293-1313, 2001.
26. Wright WG and Glasauer S. Haptic subjective vertical shows context dependence: task and vision play a role during dynamic tilt stimulation. Ann NY Acad Sci 1004: 531-535, 2003.