Individual differences in sequence learning and auditory pattern sensitivity as revealed with evoked potentials

European Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 261-264

  Tubau, Elisabet ^a   Escera, Carles ^a   Carral, Vanessa ^a   Corral, María José ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Action control; Auditory action effects; Explicit and non explicit learners; Mismatch negativity; Sequential action

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MEMORY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PITCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MEMORY; MOVEMENT; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING;

EID: 34447128205     PISSN: 0953816X     EISSN: 14609568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05637.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Amenedo, E. Escera, C. (2000) The accuracy of sound duration representation in the human brain determines the accuracy of behavioural perception. Eur. J. Neurosci., 12, 2570 2574.
2. Atienza, M., Cantero, J.L., Grau, C., Gómez, C., Domínguez-Marín, E. Escera, C. (2003) Effects of temporal encoding on auditory object formation: a mismatch negativity study. Cogn. Brain Res., 16, 359 371.
3. Baldwin, K.B. Kutas, M. (1997) An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. Psychophysiology, 34, 74 86.
4. Burgess, N. Hitch, G.J. (1999) Memory for serial order: a network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychol. Rev., 106, 551 581.
5. Carral, V., Corral, M.J. Escera, C. (2005) Auditory event-related potentials as a function of abstract change magnitude. Neuroreport, 16, 301 305.
6. Eimer, M., Goschke, T., Schlaghecken, F. Stürmer, B. (1996) Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 22, 970 987.
7. Eliassen, J.C., Souza, T. Sanes, J.N. (2001) Human brain activation accompanying explicitly directed movement sequence learning. Exp. Brain Res., 141, 269 280.
8. Ford, J.M. Hillyard, S.A. (1981) Event-related potentials (ERPs) to interruptions of a steady rhythm. Psychophysiology, 18, 322 330.
9. Frensch, P.A. Miner, C.S. (1994) Individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Mem. Cogn., 22, 95 110.
10. Hoffmann, J. Koch, I. (1997) Stimulus-response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychol. Res., 60, 87 97.
11. Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A. Stoecker, C. (2001) Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in SRT tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 27, 470 482.
12. Lashley, K.S. (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior. In Jeffress, L.A. (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior. Wiley, New York, pp. 112 136.
13. Näätänen, R. Escera, C. (2000) Mismatch negativity: clinical and other applications. Audiol. Neurootol., 5, 105 110.
14. Näätänen, R., Lehtokoski, A., Lennes, M., Cheour, M., Huotilainen, M., Iivonen, A., Vainio, M., Alku, P., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Luuk, A., Allik, J., Sinkkonen, J. Alho, K. (1997) Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses. Nature, 385, 432 434.
15. Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P. Winkler, I. (2001) 'Primitive Intelligence' in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci., 24, 283 288.
16. Näätänen, R. Winkler, I. (1999) The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull., 125, 826 859.
17. Rüsseler, J., Henninghaussen, E., Münte, T. Rösler, F. (2003) Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Cogn. Brain Res., 15, 116 126.
18. Saito, S. (2001) The phonological loop and memory for rhythms: an individual differences approach. Memory, 9, 313 322.
19. Sakai, K., Hikosaka, O. Nakamura, K. (2004) Emergence of rhythm during motor learning. Trends Cogn. Sci., 8, 547 553.
20. Stöcker, C. Hoffmann, J. (2004) The ideomotor principle and motor sequence acquisition: tone effects facilitate movement chunking. Psychol. Res., 68, 126 137.
21. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K. Näätänen, R. (1994) Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90 92.
22. Tubau, E., Hommel, B. López-Moliner, J. (2007) Modes of executive control in sequence learning: from stimulus-based to plan-based control. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 136, 43 63.
23. Tubau, E. López-Moliner, J. (2004) Spatial interference and response control in sequence learning: the role of explicit knowledge. Psychol. Res., 68, 55 63.
24. Unsworth, N. Engle, R.W. (2005) Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: evidence from the serial reaction time task. Mem. Cogn., 33, 213 220.