Teachers' opinions on quality criteria for Competency Assessment Programs

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 857-867

  Baartman, Liesbeth K J ^a   Bastiaens, Theo J ^a   Kirschner, Paul A ^a   Van der Vleuten, Cees P M ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Alternative assessment; Evaluation criteria; Teacher attitudes; Vocational education

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447114636     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.043     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alderson J.C., and Wall D. Does washback exist?. Applied Linguistics 14 (1993) 115-129
2. Baartman L.K.J., Bastiaens T.J., Kirschner P.A., and Van der Vleuten C.P.M. The wheel of competency assessment. Presenting quality criteria for Competency Assessment Programmes. Studies in Educational Evaluation 32 (2006) 153-177
3. Bachman L.F. Alternative interpretations of alternative assessments: Some validity issues in educational performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 21 (2002) 5-18
4. Bennis W.G., Benne K.D., and Chinn R. The planning of change (1969), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
5. Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at university (1999), SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham, UK
6. Birenbaum M. New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In: Segers M., Dochy F.J.R.C., and Cascallar E. (Eds). Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 13-36
7. Chester M.D. Multiple measures and high-stakes decisions: A framework for combining measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 22 (2003) 32-41
8. Cizek G.J. Learning, achievement and assessment: Constructs at a crossroad. In: Phye G.D. (Ed). Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement and adjustment (1997), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-32
9. Conca L.M., Schechter C.P., and Castle S. Challenges teachers face as they work to connect assessment and instruction. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 10 (2004) 59-75
10. Deetman, W.J. (2001). Stuurgroep examens MBO, Advies examinering MBO [Steering committee on examinations in vocational education, Advice on examinations in vocational education]. Advice to the Minister of Education, Culture and Sciences, April 20, 2001, Den Haag, The Netherlands. Retrieved November 8, 2005 from http://www.minocw.nl/documenten/brief2k-2001-24055c.pdf.
11. Driessen E.W., Van der Vleuten C.P.M., Van Tartwijk J., and Vermunt J. The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: A case study. Medical Education 39 (2005) 214-220
12. Frederiksen N. The real test bias. Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American Psychologist 39 (1984) 193-202
13. Frey B.B., Petersen S., Edwards L.M., Teramoto Pedrotti J., and Peyton V. Item-writing rules: Collective wisdom. Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (2005) 357-364
14. Graham P. Classroom-based assessment: Changing knowledge and practice through preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (2005) 607-621
15. Gulikers J.T.M., Bastiaens T.J., and Kirschner P.A. A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Design 52 (2004) 67-87
16. Hambleton R.K. Advances in assessment models, methods, and practices. In: Berliner D.C., and Calfee R.C. (Eds). Handbook of educational psychology (1996), MacMillan, New York 899-925
17. Kane M.T. An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1992) 527-535
18. Kane M.T. Certification testing as an illustration of argument-based validation. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 2 (2004) 135-170
19. Linn R.L., Baker J., and Dunbar S.B. Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher 20 (1991) 15-21
20. Maclellan E. Initial knowledge states about assessment: Novice teachers' conceptualisations. Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2004) 523-535
21. McDowell L. The impact of innovative assessment on student learning. Education and Training International 32 (1995) 302-313
22. Messick S. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher 23 (1994) 13-23
23. Miller M.D., and Linn R.L. Validation of performance-based assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement 24 (2000) 367-378
24. Moss P.M. Can there be validity without reliability?. Educational Research 23 (1994) 5-12
25. Moss P.A. Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher 25 (1996) 20-28
26. Onderwijsraad. (2006). Doortastend onderwijstoezicht. Aanbevelingen voor toekomstig toezicht op het onderwijs. Advies uitgebracht aan het Ministerie van OC&W. [Vigorous inspection. Recommendations for future inspection of education. Advice to the Ministry of Education]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Onderwijsraad.
27. Schuwirth L.W.T., and Van der Vleuten C.P.M. Changing education, changing assessment, changing research?. Medical Education 38 (2004) 805-812
28. Taylor C. Assessment for measurement or standards: The peril and promise of large-scale assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal 31 (1994) 231-262
29. Uhlenbeck, A.M. (2002). The development of an assessment procedures for beginning teachers of English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden, ICLON Graduate School of Education, Leiden, The Netherlands.
30. Van der Sanden J.M.M., Van Os M.J.M., and Kok H. Naar aantrekkelijk technisch vmbo. Resultaten van drie jaar herontwerp [Towards attractive technical pre-vocational education. Results of three years of re-development] (2003), Opmeer Drukkerij B.V, Stichting Axis, Den Haag, The Netherlands
31. Van der Vleuten C.P.M., and Schuwirth L.W.T. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Medical Education 39 (2005) 309-317
32. Webb C., Endacott R., Gray M.A., Jasper M.A., McMullan M., and Scholes J. Evaluating portfolio assessment systems: What are the appropriate criteria?. Nurse Education Today 23 (2003) 600-609