Rethinking the articulation between business and technical communication and writing in the disciplines: Useful avenues for teaching and research

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 248-277

  Russell, David R ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business communication; Review; Technical communication; Writing across the curriculum; Writing in the disciplines

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250814611     PISSN: 10506519     EISSN: 15524574     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1050651907300452     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Amidon, S.R. (2005). Writing the learning organization: A framework for teaching and research. Business and Communication Quarterly, 68, 406-428.
2. Anson, C. M. (Ed.). (2002). The WAC casebook. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Anson, C.M. (2006, May). Toward a new conversation: Integrating the scholarship of teaching and learning into CAC programs. Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference on Writing Across the Curriculum, Clemson, SC.
4. Anson, C.M., Forsberg, L. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7, 200-231.
5. Anson, C.M., Bernold, L.E., Crossland, C., Spurlin, J., McDermott, M., Weiss, S. (2003). Empowerment to learn in engineering: Preparation for an urgently needed paradigm shift. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 7 (2). 145-155.
6. Bangert-Drowns, R., Hurley, M., Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29-58.
7. Bazerman, C. (1980). A relationship between reading and writing: The conversation model. College English, 41, 656-661.
8. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
9. Bean, J.C. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Beaufort, A. (in press). Writing in the professions. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, and text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Beer, A. (2000). Diplomats in the basement: Graduate engineering students and intercultural communication. In P. Dias A. Par (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 61-88). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Books.
12. Ben-David Kolikant, Y., Linsenmeier, R.A., Hirsch, P., Gatchell, D.W. (2006). A cognitive-apprenticeship-inspired instructional approach for teaching scientific writing and reading. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36, 20-25.
13. Blakeslee, A.M. (1997). Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers in situ. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, 125-169.
14. Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: McKay.
15. Bosley, D.S. (2000). A proposal for the marriage of technical communication and WAC/ WID. In CPTSC Proceedings. Retrieved September 9, 2006, from http://www.cptsc.org/conferences/conference2000/program2000/ strategiesfordesign/bosley.pdf
16. Bosley, D. (2004). Jumping off the ivory tower: Changing the academic perspective. In B. Mirel R. Spilka (Eds.), Reshaping technical communication (pp. 27-40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American lives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Britton, J. (1982). Prospect and retrospect: Selected essays of James Britton (G. M. Pradl, Ed.). Montclair, NJ: Boynton.
19. Bustamante, I. (1991). The role of reading in teaching business writing. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teaching and Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED345549)
20. Carnes, L.W., Jennings, M.S., Vice, J.P., Wiedmaier, C. (2001). The role of the business educator in a writing-across-the-curriculum program. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 216-219.
21. Carter, M. (2004). Teaching genre to English first-language adults: A study of the laboratory report. Research in the Teaching of English, 38, 395-413.
22. Carter, M., Anson, C.M., Miller, C. (2003). Assessing technical writing in institutional contexts: Using outcomes-based assessment for programmatic thinking. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12, 101-114.
23. Casanave, C.P. (1995). Local interactions: Constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program. In D. Belcher G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: Essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 83-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24. CDIO: Conceive, Design, Implement, Operate. (n.d.). Retrieved December 6, 2006, from http://www.cdio.org/
25. CompPile. (2004). Retrieved December 7, 2006, from http://comppile. tamucc.edu/
26. Connors, R.J. (1996). The abolition debate in composition: A short history. In L. Z. Bloom, D. A. Daiker, E. M. White (Eds.), Composition in the twenty-first century: Crisis and change (pp. 46-63). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
27. Consortium for the Study of Engineering Communication. (2006). Retrieved October 12, 2006, from the Rice University Web site: http://www.ruf.rice.edu/ ~engicomm/
28. CWE funds department project. (2006). Retrieved October 12, 2006, from the Miami University Web site: http://www.units.muohio.edu/cwe/facultyresources/ departmentalprojects.html
29. Cyphert, D. (2002). Integrating communication across the MBA curriculum. Business Communication Quarterly, 65 (3). 81-86.
30. Davidson, L.S., Gumnior. E.C. (1993). Writing to learn in a business economics class. Journal of Economic Education, 24, 237-243.
31. Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., Par, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. EngiComm. (2006). Engineering Communication Special Interest Group. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~williams/engicom/ home.htm
33. Engineering design communication. (2006). Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from the Northwestern University Web site: http://www.edc.northwestern.edu/
34. Epstein, M.H. (1999). Teaching field-specific writing: Results of a WAC survey. Business Communication Quarterly, 62 (1). 29-41.
35. Fisher, D. (2006). Remediating the professional classroom: The new rhetoric of teaching and learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames.
36. Flynn, E.A., Remlinger, K., Bulleit, W. (1997). Interaction across the curriculum. Journal of Advanced Composition, 17, 343-364.
37. Ford, J.D. (2004). Knowledge transfer across disciplines: Tracking rhetorical strategies from a technical communication classroom to an engineering classroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 301-315.
38. Forman, J., Rymer, J. (1999). The genre system of the Harvard case method. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13, 373-401.
39. Freedman, A. (1990). Reconceiving genre. Texte, 8 / 9, 279-292.
40. Freedman, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 222-251.
41. Freedman, A., Adam, C., Smart, G. (1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and genres as simulations. Written Communication, 11, 193-226.
42. Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
43. Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies in the materiality of writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Hall, S., Tiggeman, T. (1995). Getting the big picture: Writing to learn in a finance class. Business Communication Quarterly, 58 (1). 12-15.
45. Harms, P.L. (2004). Writing-across-the-curriculum in a linked course model for first-year students: An activity theory analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames.
46. Herndl, C.G. (1993). Teaching discourse and reproducing culture: A critique of research and pedagogy in professional and non-academic writing. College Composition and Communication, 44, 349-363.
47. Herndl, C., Brown, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
48. Herrington, A.J. (1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-359.
49. Hirsch, P., Smith, H.D., Birol, G., Yalvac, B., Casler, J., Anderson, J.C., et al. (2005, June). Establishing school-wide standards for engineering writing: A data-driven approach. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. ASEE, Portland, OR.
50. Idea. (2006). Retrieved December 6, 2006, from Northwestern University, the Institute for Design and Engineering Applications Web site: http://www.idea.northwestern.edu/
51. Klein, P.D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 203-270.
52. Knodt, E.A. (1994). What do you think? Collaborative learning and critical thinking in the business writing class. In J. S. Leonard, C. E. Wharton, R. M. Davis, J. Harris (Eds.), Authority and textuality: Current views of collaborative writing (pp. 113-126). West Cornwall, CT: Locust Hill Press.
53. Kramer, F., Kruiningen, J. van, Padmos, H. (2003). Creating a basis for a faculty-oriented writing program: Approaches, Opportunities and pitfalls in the academic writing project in Groningen. In L. Bjrk, G. Bruer, L. Rienecker, P. S. Jrgensen (Eds.), Teaching academic writing in higher education: European perspectives on writing programs and writing centres (pp. 125-141). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
54. Lillis, T. (1999). Whose common sense ? In C. Jones, J. Turner, B. V. Street (Eds.), Students writing in the university (pp. 127-147). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
55. Linton, P., Madigan, R., Johnson, S. (1994). Introducing students to disciplinary genres: The role of the general composition course. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 1 (2). 63-78.
56. Mabrito, M. (1999). From workplace to classroom: Teaching professional writing. Business Communication Quarterly, 62 (3). 101-105.
57. Matsuda, P.K., Jablonski, J. (2000). Beyond the L2 metaphor: Towards a mutually trans-formative model of ESL/WAC collaboration. Academic Writing, 1. Retrieved October 10, 2006, from http://aw.colostate.edu/articles/ matsuda_jablonski2000.htm
58. Medway, P. (2000). Writing and design in architectural education. In P. Dias A. Par (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 89-128). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
59. Michaelson, H.B. (1987). How writing helps RD work. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 30 (2). 85-86.
60. Miller, C.R. (2004). Reuniting wisdom and eloquence. In D. R. Ollis, K. A. Neeley, H. C. Luegenbiehl (Eds.), Liberal education in 21st century engineering (pp. 41-50). New York: Peter Lange.
61. Mirel, B., Spilka, R. (Eds.). (2002). Reshaping technical communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Mohrweis, L.C. (1991). The impact of writing assignments on accounting students' writing skills. Journal of Accounting Education, 9, 309-325.
63. Moran, M.G. (2006). Frank Aydelotte and the Oxford approach to English studies, 1908-1940. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
64. New trend in collaborative instruction. (2000). In A SEE prism online exploring the future of engineering education. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.prism-magazine.org/nov00/Extras/extras.cfm
65. Odell, L., Goswami, D. (Eds.). (1985). Writing in nonacademic settings. New York: Guilford.
66. Odell, L., Swersey, B. (2003). Reinventing invention: Writing across the curriculum without WAC. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 6 (3). 39-54.
67. Ollis, D. R., Neeley, K. A., Luegenbiehl, H.C. (Eds.). (2004). Liberal education in 21st century engineering. New York: Lange.
68. Par, A. (2000). Writing as a way into social work: Genre sets, genre systems, and distributed cognition. In P. X. Dias A. Par (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 145-166). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
69. Parks, S. (2001). Moving from school to the workplace: Disciplinary innovation, border crossings, and the reshaping of a written genre. Applied Linguistics, 22, 405-438.
70. Perelman, L. (2004). Creating a communication-intensive undergraduate curriculum in science and engineering for the 21st century. In D. R. Ollis, K. A. Neeley, H. C. Luegenbiehl (Eds.), Liberal education in 21st century engineering (pp. 64-81). New York: Lange.
71. Plutsky, S., Wilson, B.A. (2001). Writing across the curriculum in a college of business and economics. Business Communication Quarterly, 64 (4). 26-41.
72. Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73. Project summary. (2006). In S peaking of software: Integrating communication and documentation techniques into an undergraduate software engineering curriculum. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.speaksoft. mtu.edu/
74. Reave, L. (2004). Technical communication instruction in engineering schools: A survey of top-ranked U.S. and Canadian programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18, 452-490.
75. Reinsch, N.L., Jr., Reinsch, J.W. (1996). Some assessments of business communication scholarship from social science citations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 28-47.
76. Reuter, Y., Lehanier-Reuter, D. (2004). L'Analyse de la discipline: Quelques problmes pour la recherche en didactique. In Actes du 9ieme Colloque de l'AIRDF. Retrieved November 20, 2006, from http://www.colloqueairdf.fse.ulaval. ca/fichier/Communications/YReuter-Dom-Reuter.pdf
77. Riordan, D.D., Riordan, M.P., Sullivan, M.C. (2000). Writing across the accounting curriculum: An experiment. Business Communication Quarterly, 63 (3). 49-59.
78. Rivard, L.P. (1994). A review of writing-to-learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969-983.
79. Schreiben in den Ingenieurwissenschaften. (2006). Retrieved November 20, 2006, from RWTH Aachen University, Institut fr Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft Web site: http://www.tl.rwth-aachen.de/forschung/ projekte.html
80. Schriver, K. (2004). Taking our stakeholders seriously: Re-imagining the dissemination of research in information design. In B. Mirel R. Spilka (Eds.), Reshaping technical communication (pp. 111-129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81. Singer, D., Walvoord, B.F. (1984). Process-oriented writing instruction in a case-method class. Proceedings of the Academy of Management (pp. 121-125). Boston: Academy of Management.
82. Skillen, J., James, B., Percy, A., Tootell, H., Irvine, H. (2003). From integration to transformation. In Proceedings of the National Language and Academic Skills Conference, Adelaide. Retrieved November 22, 2006, from http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/133
83. Skillen, J., Merten, M., Trivett, N., Percy, A. (1998). The IDEALL approach to learning development: A model for fostering improved literacy and learning outcomes for students. In Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education 1998 Adelaide Conference. Retrieved November 24, 2006, from http://www.swin.edu.au/aare/conf98.htm
84. Smart, G. (1993). Genre as community invention: A central bank's response to its executives' expectations as readers. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 124-140). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
85. Smart, G. (2006). Writing the economy: Activity, genre, and technology in the world of banking. London: Equinox.
86. Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
87. St. Amant, K., Zemliansky, P. (2005). Internet-based workplace communications: Industry and academic applications. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
88. Star, S.L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 37-54). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
89. Stout, D.E., Sumutka, A.R., Wygal, D.E. (1991). Experiential evidence on the use of writing assignments in upper-level accounting courses. Advances in Accounting, 9, 125-141.
90. Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
91. Technical communication. (2006). Retrieved December 7, 2006, from the University of Washington College of Engineering Web site: http://www.uwtc. washington.edu/programs/ecp/
92. Technical writing requirement. (2006). Retrieved October 12, 2006, from the Cornell University College of Engineering Web site: http://www.engineering. cornell.edu/programs/undergraduate-education/engineering-communications/ tech-writing-program/index.cfm
93. Thompson, I., Hendrix, C.M. (2000). Learning-to-communicate and communicating-to-learn in veterinary medicine: A survey of writing, speaking, and reading in veterinary medical curricula. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30, 105 123.
94. VaNTH (VanderbiltNorthwesternTexasHarvard/MIT) Engineering Research Center for Bioengineering Educational Technologies. (2005). Retrieved October 21, 2006, from http://vanth.org
95. Van Nostrand, A.D. (1997). Fundable knowledge: The marketing of defense technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
96. Walker, K. (2000). Integrating writing instruction into engineering courses: A writing center model. Journal of Engineering Education, 89, 369-375.
97. Wallace, C.S., Hand, B., Prain, V. (2004). Writing and learning in the science classroom. New York: Springer.
98. Walvoord, B.E., Hunt, L.L., Dowling, H.F., McMahon, J.D. (1997). In the long run: A study of faculty in three writing-across-the-curriculum programs. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
99. Watts, J.M. (2006). Four teachers, four years: Analyzing teacher feedback in a learning community. Unpublished manuscript.
100. What is writing pad ? (2006). Project writing pad. Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.writing-pad.ac.uk/index.php?path=photos/ 17_About%20this%20site/04_What%20is%20Writing%20PAD/
101. Williams, J.M. (2001). Transformations in technical communication pedagogy: Engineering, writing, and the ABET engineering criteria 2000. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10, 149-168.
102. Winsor, D.A. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
103. Winsor, D.A. (2003). Writing power: An ethnographic study of writing in an engineering center. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
104. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.