Trends and plot methods in MLR studies

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 751-760

  Besalú, Emili ^a   De Julián Ortiz, Jesus V ^b   Pogliani, Lionello ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTRAPOLATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

LEAVEONE-OUT CROSS-VALIDATION TECHNIQUE; MULTILINEAR REGRESSION; POINT CLOUD;

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 34250806063     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci6004959     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. 2! J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 269-276.
2. Golbraikh, A.; Shen, M; Xiao, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Lee, K.-H.; Tropsha, A. Rational Selection of Training and Test Sets for the Development of Validated QSAR Models. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 77, 241-253.
3. Hawkins, D. M.; Basak, S. C; Mills, D. Assessing Model Fit by CrossValidation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 579-586.
4. Hawkins, D. M. The Problem of Overfilling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1-12.
5. Peterangelo, S. C.; Seybold, P. G. Synergistic Interactions among QSAR Descriptors. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2004, 96, 1-9.
6. Pogliani, L.; de Julián-Ortiz, J. V. Plot Methods in Quantitative Structure-Property Studies. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393, 327-330.
7. Pogliani, L.; de Julián-Ortiz, J. V. Residual Plots and the Quality of a Model. MATCH 2005, 53, 175-180.
8. Besalú, E.; de Julián-Ortiz, J.; Iglesias, M.; Pogliani, L. An Overlooked Property of Plot Methods. J. Math. Chem. 2006, 39, 475-484.
9. Besalú, E.; de Julián-Ortiz, J.; Pogliani, L. Some Plots Are Not that Equivalent. MATCH 2006, 55, 281-286.
10. Galton, F. Regression towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature. J. Anthrop. Inst. 1886, 15, 246-263.
11. Denis, D. J. The origins of correlation and regression: Francis Galton or Auguste Bravais and the error theorists? Hist. Philos. Psychol. Bull. 2001, 13, 36-44.
12. Landow, L. Another Example of Regression to the Mean. Aneseth. Analg. (Hagerstown, MD, U.S.) 2002, 94 (6), 1673-1673.
13. Browne, S. M.; Halligan, P. W.; Wade, D. T.; Taggart, D. P. Cognitive Performance after Cardiac Operation: Implications of Regression toward the Mean. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999, 117 (3), 481-485.
14. Bland, J. M.; Altman, D. G. Regression towards the Mean. BMJ [Br. Med. J.] 1994, 308, 1499-1499.
15. Bland, J. M.; Altman, D. G. Statistics Notes: Some Examples of Regression towards the Mean. BMJ [Br. Med. J.] 1994, 309 (6957), 780-780.
16. Fitzmaurice, G. Regression to the Mean. Nutrition 2000, 16 (1), 81-82.
17. Newell D.; Simpson, J. Regression to the Mean. Med. J. Aust. 1990, 153(3), 166-168.
18. Erev, I.; Wallsten, T. S.; Budescu, D. V. Simultaneous Over- and Underconfidence: The Role of Error in Judgment Processes. Psychol. Rev. 1994, 101, 519-527.
19. Nesselroade, J. R.; Stigler, S. M.; Baltes, P. B. Regression toward the Mean and the Study of Change. Psychol. Bull. 1980, 88 (3), 622-637.
20. Clarke, D. B.; Clarke, A. M.; Brown, R. I. Regression to the Mean A Confused Concept. Br. J. Psychol. 1960, 51, 105-117.
21. Furby, L. Interpreting Regression toward the Mean in Developmental Research. Dev. Psychol. 1973, 8, 172-179.
22. Davis, C. E. The Effect of Regression to the Mean in Epidemiological and Clinical Studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1976, 104, 493-498.
23. Egelberg, J. The Impact of Regression towards the Mean on Probing Changes in Studies on the Effect of Periodontal Therapy. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1989, 16, 120-123.
24. Blomqvist, N. On the Bias Caused by Regression toward the Mean in Studying the Relation between Change and Initial Value. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1987, 14, 34-37.
25. Denke, M. A.; Frantz, I. D. Response to a Cholesterol-Lowering Diet: Efficacy Is Greater in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects even after Adjustment for Regression to the Mean. Am. J. Med. 1993, 94, 626-631.
26. Chuang-Stein, C.; Tong, D. M. The Impact and Implication of Regression to the Mean on the Design and Analysis of Medical Investigations. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 1997, 6, 115-128.
27. Mee, R. W.; Chua, T. C. Regression toward the Mean and Paired Sample t Test. Am. Stat. 1991, 45, 39-41.
28. Cumow, R. N. Correcting for Regression in Assessing the Response to Treatment in a Selected Population. Stat. Med. 1987, 6, 113-117.
29. Koenker, R. Galton, Edgeworth, Frisch, and Prospects for Quantile Regression in Econometrics. J. Econometrics 2000, 95 (2), 347-374.
30. Los, C. A. Galton's Error and the Under-Representation of Systematic Risk. J. Banking Finance 1999, 23 (12), 1793-1829.
31. Friedmand, M. Do Old Fallacies Ever Die? J. Econ. Lit. 1992, 30 (4), 2129-2132.
32. Quah, D. Galton's Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis. Scand. J. Econ. 1993, 95 (4), 427-443.
33. Zimmerman, D. J. Regression towards Mediocrity in Economic States. Am. Econ. Rev. 1992, 82 (3), 409-429.
34. Davis, G. A. Accident Reduction Factors and Causal Inference in Traffic Safety Studies: A Review. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2000, 32 (1), 95-109.
35. Persaud, B. Relating the Effect of Safety Measures to Expected Number of Accidents. Accid. Anal. Prev. 1986, 78 (1), 63-70.
36. Anand, D.; Schinnar, A. P. Technical Issues in Measuring Scholastic Improvement due to Compensatory Education Programs. SocioEconomic Planning Sci. 1990, 24 (2), 143-153.
37. Audas, R.; Dobson, S.; Goddard, J. The impact of managerial change on team performance in professional sports. J. Econ. Business 2002, 54 (6), 633-650.
38. Smith, G. Do Statistics Test Scores Regress Toward the Mean? Chance 1997, 10 (4), 42-45.
39. Lee, M; Smith, G. Regression to the Mean and Football Wagers J. Behav. Dec. Making 2002, 15, 329-342.
40. Gamson, W. A.; Scotch, N. A. Scapegoating in Baseball. Am. J. Social. 1964, 70, 69-72.
41. Anscombe, F. J. Graphs in Statistical Analysis. Am. Stat. 1973, 27, 17-21.
42. Verbeek, M. A Guide to Modern Econometrics, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U. K., 2004.
43. Wang, R.; Wang, S. How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41 (5), 1422-1426.
44. Box, G. E. P.; Muller, M. E. A Note on the Generation of Random Normal Deviates. Ann. Math. Stat. 1958, 29, 610-611.
45. Adcock, R. J. A Problem in Least Squares. Analyst 1878, 5, 53-54.
46. Murcia-Soler, M.; Pérez-Giménez, F.; Nalda-Molina, R.; SalabertSalvador, M. T.; García-March, F. J.; Cercós-del-Pozo, R. A.; Garrigues, T. M. QSAR Analysis of Hypoglycemic Agents Using the Topological Indices. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41 (5), 1345-1354.
47. Yin, S.; Shuai, Z.; Wang, Y. A Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Study of the Glass Transition Temperature of OLED Materials. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 970-977. After inspection of the data in this article, one concludes that, in Figure 2, the "calculated" label must be "experimental" and "predicted" label must read "fitted" or " calculated".
48. Peterangelo, S. C.; Seybold, P. G. Synergistic Interactions among QSAR Descriptors. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2004, 96, 1-9.
49. Wang, R.; Lai, L.; Wang, S. Further Development and Validation of Empirical Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Binding Affinity Prediction. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 11-26.
50. Huuskonen, J. QSAR Modeling with the Electrotopological State: TIBO Derivatives. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 425-429.
51. Esbensen, K. H. Multivariate Data Analysis - In Practice, 5th ed.; CAMO Process AS: Oslo, 2002.
52. Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110 (18), 5959-5967.
53. Cramer, R. D.; Depriest, S. A.; Patterson, D. E.; Hecht, P. The Developing Practice of Comparative Molecular Field Analysis. In 3D QSAR in Drug Design; Kubinyi, H. Ed.; ESCOM: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1993; pp 443-467.
54. Klebe, G. Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices: CoMSIA. In 3D QSAR in Drug Design; Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G., Martin, Y. C., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Great Britain, 1998; pp 3-87.
55. Tong, W.; Lowis, D. R. Evaluation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Methods for Large-Scale Prediction of Chemicals Binding to the Estrogen Receptor. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38 (4), 669-677.
56. Besalú, E. Fast Computation of Cross-Validated Properties in Full Linear Leave-Many-Out Procedures. J. Math. Chem. 2001, 29 (3), 191-204.
57. Weisberg, S. Applied Linear Regression, 2nd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1985.
58. Kroeger, M. B.; Hose, B. M.; Hawkins, A.; Lipchock, J.; Famsworth, D. W.; Rizzo, R. C.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Arnold, E.; Zhang, W.; Hughes, S. H.; Jorgensen, W. L.; Michejda, C. J.; Smith, R. H. Molecular Modeling Calculations of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Nonnucleoside Inhibitors: Correlation of Binding Energy with Biological Activity for Novel 2-Aryl-Substituted Benzimidazole Analogues. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1940-1947.
59. Prathipati, P.; Pandey, G.; Saxena, A. K. CoMFA and Docking Studies on Glycogen Phosphorylase a Inhibitors as Antidiabetic Agents. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45 (1), 136-145.
60. Chohan, K. K.; Paine, S. W.; Mistry, J.; Barton, P.; Davis, A. M. A Rapid Computational Filter for Cytochrome P450 1A2 Inhibition Potential of Compound Libraries. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (16), 5154-5161.
61. Boström, J.; Böhm, M.; Gundertofte, K.; Klebe, G. A 3D QSAR Study on a Set of Dopamine 04 Receptor Antagonists. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (3), 1020-1027.
62. Ragno, R.; Marshall, G. R.; Di Santo, R.; Costi, R.; Massa, S.; Rompei, R.; Artico, M. Antimycobacterial Pyrroles: Synthesis, Anti-Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Activity and QSAR Studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 1423-1432.
63. Kuo, C.-L.; Assefa, H.; Kamath, S.; Brzozowski, Z.; Slawinski, J.; Saczewski, F.; Buolamwini, J. K.; Neamati, N. Application of CoMFA and CoMSIA 3D-QSAR and Docking Studies in Optimization of Mercaptobenzenesulfonamides as HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (2), 385-399.
64. Davies, A. M. C. Cross-Validation: Do We Love It too Much? Spectrosc. Eur. 1998, 10, 24-25.