Modularity beyond perception: Evidence from single task interference paradigms

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-36

  Magen, Hagit ^a   Cohen, Asher ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Flanker task; Modularity; Stroop; Visual dimensions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COLOR VISION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; VISION;

COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 34250752876     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Cohen J.D., Dunbar K., and McClelland J.L. On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 332-361
2. Cohen A., and Feintuch U. The dimensional-action system: A distinct visual system. In: Prinz W., and Hommel B. (Eds). Attention and performance Vol. XIX (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 587-608
3. Cohen A., and Ivry R. Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 (1989) 650-663
4. Cohen A., and Ivry R. Density effects in conjunction search: Evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 (1991) 891-901
5. Cohen A., and Magen H. Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single feature targets. Perception & Psychophysics 61 (1999) 291-307
6. Cohen A., and Magen H. Hierarchies of attention and action. In: Humphreys G., and Riddoch J. (Eds). Attention in action (2005), Psychology Press, London 27-68
7. Cohen J.D., Servan-Schreiber D., and McClelland J.L. A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. American Journal of Psychology 105 (1992) 239-269
8. Cohen A., and Shoup R. Perceptual dimensional constraints on response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology 32 (1997) 128-181
9. Cohen A., and Shoup R. Response selection processes for conjunctive targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 391-411
10. Coles M.G.H., Gratton G., Bashore T.R., Eriksen C.W., and Donchin E. A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous-flow model of human information-processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 (1985) 529-553
11. Duncan J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1984) 501-517
12. Durgin F.H. The reverse Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 (2000) 121-125
13. Durgin F.H. Translation and competition among internal representations in a reverse Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 367-378
14. Dyer F.N. The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory & Cognition 1 (1973) 106-120
15. Eriksen B.A., and Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16 (1974) 143-149
16. Eriksen C.W., and Eriksen B.A. Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing?. Perception & Psychophysics 26 (1979) 195-205
17. Eriksen C.W., and Schultz D.W. Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics 25 (1979) 249-263
18. Feintuch U., and Cohen A. Visual attention and coactivation of response decisions for features from different dimensions. Psychological Science 13 (2002) 361-369
19. Glaser W.R., and Glaser M.O. Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of experimental Psychology: General 118 (1989) 13-42
20. Hasson U., Levy I., Behrmann M., Hendler T., and Malach R. Eccentricity bias as an organizing principle for human high-order object areas. Neuron 34 (2002) 479-490
21. Henik A., Ro T., Merrill D., Rafal R., and Safadi Z. Interaction between color and word processing in a flanker task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance 25 (1999) 198-209
22. Hock H.S., and Egeth H. Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (1970) 299-303
23. Hommel B. Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research 59 (1997) 248-260
24. Hommel B. Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition 5 (1998) 183-216
25. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., and Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 849-878
26. Hyman R. Stimulus information as determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45 (1953) 188-196
27. Jolicoeur P., Tombu M., Oriet C., and Stevanovski B. From perception to action: making the connection - A tutorial. In: Prinz W., and Hommel B. (Eds). Attention and performance Vol. XIX (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 558-586
28. Kahneman D., and Henik A. Perceptual organization and attention. In: Kubovy M., and Pomerantz J.R. (Eds). Perceptual organization (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 181-211
29. Keele S.W. Attention demands of memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1972) 245-248
30. Keele S.W. Behavioral analysis of movement. In: Brooks V. (Ed). Motor control: Handbook of physiology: Section 1 Vol. 2 (1981), American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD 1391-1414
31. Klein G.S. Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology 77 (1964) 576-588
32. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., and Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive bias for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 97 (1990) 253-270
33. Logan G.D. Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 523-553
34. Logan G.D., and Gordon R.D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 393-434
35. Logan G.D., and Zbrodoff N.J. Stroop-type interference: Congruity effects in color naming with typewritten responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 978-992
36. MacLeod C.M. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 109 (1991) 163-203
37. MacLeod C.M., and Dunbar K. Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14 (1988) 126-135
38. Magen H., and Cohen A. Action-based and vision-based selection of input: Two sources of control. Psychological Research 66 (2002) 247-259
39. Meyer D.E., and Kieras D.E. A computational theory of human multiple-task performance: The EPIC information-processing architecture and strategic response deferment model. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 1-65
40. Miller J. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Perception & Psychophysics 49 (1991) 270-288
41. Mordkoff J.T. Between-dimension flanker effects: A clarification with encouraging implications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 (1998) 670-675
42. Mortier K., Theeuwes J., and Starreveld P. Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 542-557
43. Morton J. Categories of interference: Verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. British Journal of Psychology 60 (1969) 329-346
44. Muller H.J., Heller D., and Ziegler J. Visual-search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 57 (1995) 1-17
45. Pashler H. Dual task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 116 (1994) 220-244
46. Posner M.I., and Snyder C.R.R. Attention and cognitive control. In: Solso R.L. (Ed). Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (1975), Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ 55-85
47. Sanders A.F. Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
48. Schumacher E.H., Lauber E.J., Glass J.M., Zurbriggen E.L., Gmeindl L., Kieras D.E., et al. Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 791-814
49. Schweickert R. Critical-path scheduling of mental processes in a dual task. Science 209 (1980) 704-706
50. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In: Koster W.G. (Ed). Attention and performance Vol. II (1969), North-Holland, Amsterdam 276-315
51. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (1935) 643-662
52. Sugg M.J., and McDonald J.E. Time course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20 (1994) 647-675
53. Treisman A.M. Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A (1988) 201-237
54. Treisman A.M., and Fearnley S. The Stroop test: Selective attention to colors and words. Nature 222 (1969) 437-439
55. Treisman A., and Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
56. Treisman A., and Schmidt H. Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 107-141
57. Virzi R.A., and Egeth H.E. Toward a translational model of Stroop interference. Memory & Cognition 13 (1985) 304-319
58. Welford A.T. The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance: A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 43 (1952) 2-19
59. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1 (1994) 202-238
60. Yeh Y.Y., and Eriksen C.W. Name codes and features in the discrimination of letter forms. Perception & Psychophysics 36 (1984) 225-233
61. Zhang H., and Kornblum S. The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 3-19