Implementation of a computer based implicit association test as a measure of attitudes toward individuals with disabilities

Journal of Rehabilitation

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 3-14

  Thomas, Adrian ^a   Doyle, Andrea ^b   Vaughn, Daly ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Tennessee Department of Personnel   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250685618     PISSN: 00224154     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Aidman, E. V. & Carroll, S. M. (2003). Implicit individual differences: Relationships between implicit self-esteem, gender identity and gender attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 17, 19-37.
2. Altman, B. (1981). Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction. Social Problems, 28, 321-337.
3. Antonak, R. F. (1982). Development and psychometric analysis of the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. The Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 13, 22-29.
4. Antonak, R. F., & Livneh, H. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities: Methods, psychometrics, and scales. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
5. Antonak, R. F., & Livneh, H. (1995). Randomized response technique: A review and proposed extension to disability attitude research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 121, 97-145.
6. Antonak, R. F., & Livneh, H. (2000). Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22, 211-224.
7. Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Muecke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380-393.
8. Bordieri, J. E., Drehmer, D. E., & Taylor, D. W. (1997). Work life for employees with disabilities: Recommendations for promotion. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 40, 181-192.
9. Cacciapaglia, H. M., Beauchamp, K. L., & Howells, G. N. (2004). Visibility of disability: Effect on willingness to interact. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 180-182.
10. Cannon, B. J., & Szuhay, J. A. (1986). Faking can elevate scores on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 30, 120-123.
11. Castelli, L., Zecchini, A., & Deamicis, L. (2005). The impact of implicit prejudice about the elderly on the reaction to stereotype confirmation and disconfirmation. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 24, 134-146.
12. Colella, A. (1994). Organizational socialization of employees with disabilities: Critical issues and implications for work-place interventions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitations, 4, 87-106.
13. Colella, A., DeNisi, A. S., & Varma, A. (1997). Appraising the performance of employees with disabilities: A review and model. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 27-53.
14. Comer, R. C., & Piliavin, J. A. (1975). As others see us: Attitudes of physically handicapped and normals toward own and other groups. Rehabilitation Literature, 35, 206-221.
15. Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
16. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Mahzarin, R. B. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163-170.
17. Deal, M. (2003). Disabled people's attitudes toward other impairment groups: A hierarchy of impairments. Disability and Society, 18, 897-910.
18. Drehmer, D. E., & Bordieri, J. E. (1985). Hiring decisions for disabled workers: The hidden bias. Rehabilitation Psychology, 30, 157-164.
19. Feldman, D. (2004). The role of physical disabilities in early career: Vocational choice, the school-to-work transition, and becoming established. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 247-274.
20. Fischer, D. G., & Fick, C. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the marlowe-crowne social desirability scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 417-424.
21. Ford, A. B., Liske, R. E., & Ort, R. S. (1962). Reactions of physicians and medical students to chronic illness. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 15, 785-794.
22. Gawronski, B. (2002). What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the covergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49, 171-180.
23. Gething, L. (1994). The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 9, 23-42.
24. Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Revised top ten list of things wrong with the IAT. Presentation at the Attitudes Preconference of the fifth annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Austin, TX.
25. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
26. Greenwald, A. G., & Famham, S. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022-1038.
27. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
28. Hagler, P., Vargo, J., & Semple, J. (1987). The potential for faking on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 31, 72-76.
29. Harasymiw, S. J., Home, M. D., & Lewis, S. C. (1976). A longitudinal study of disability group acceptance. Rehabilitation Literature, 37, 98-102.
30. Hernandez, B. (2000). Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities and their ADA employment rights: A literature review. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66, 4-17.
31. Jajodia, A., & Earleywine, M. (2003). Measuring alcohol expectancies with the Implicit Association Test. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 126-133.
32. Janicki, M. P. (1970). Attitudes of health professionals toward twelve disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 30, 77-78.
33. Jones, G. E. (1997). Advancement opportunity issues for persons with disabilities. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 55-76.
34. Jones, G. E., & Stone, D. L. (1995). Perceived discomfort associated with working with persons with varying disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 911-919.
35. Lerner, D., Adler, D. A., Chang, H., Lapitski, L., Hood, M. Y., Perissinotto, C., Reed, J., McLaughlin, T. J., Berndt, E. R., & Rogers, W. H. (2004). Unemployment, job retention, and productivity loss among employees with depression. Psychiatric Services, 55, 1371-1378.
36. Livneh, H., Lott, S. M., & Antonak, R. F. (2004). Patterns of psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability: A cluster analytic approach. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 9, 411-430.
37. Loo, R. (2001). A psychometric re-analysis of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 33, 245-250.
38. Lyons, M., & Hayes, R. (1993). Student perceptions of persons with psychiatric and other disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 541-547.
39. MacLean, D., & Gannon, P. (1995). Measuring attitudes towards disability: The Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale revisited. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 10, 791-806.
40. McConnell, A. R., & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435-442.
41. McFarland, S. (2003). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20, 483-510.
42. Nietupski, J. A., & Hamre-Nietupski, S. (2000). A systematic process for carving supported employment positions for people with severe disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 12, 103-119.
43. Nowicki, E., & Sandieson, R. (2002). A meta-analysis of school-aged children's attitudes towards persons with physical and intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 49, 243-265.
44. Pruett, S. R., & Chan, F. (2006). The development and psychometric validation of the Disability Attitude Implicit Association Test. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57, 202-213.
45. Reyna, M., & Sims, R. R. (1995). ADA and its implications for job training. In J. G. Veres III & R. R. Sims (Eds.), Human resource management and the Americans with Disabilities Act (pp. 127-148). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
46. Roush, S. E., & Klockars, A. J. (1988). Construct validation of two scales measuring attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 54, 25-30.
47. Rowatt, W. C., Franklin, L. M., & Cotton, M. (2005). Patterns and personality correlates of implicit and explicit attitudes toward Christians and Muslims. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 29-43.
48. Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Mellott, D. S. (1999). Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 17, 437-465.
49. Satcher, J., & Dooley-Dickey, K. (1992). Attitudes of human-resource management students toward persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35, 248-252.
50. Schmelkin, L. P. (1984). Hierarchy of preferences toward disabled groups: A reanalysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 151-157.
51. Sciarra, D., Chang, T., & McLean, R. (2005). White racial identity and attitudes toward people with disabilities. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 33, 232-242.
52. Siller, J., Ferguson, L. T., Vann, D. H., & Holland, B. (1968). Structure of attitudes toward the physically disabled: The Disability Factor Scales - amputation, blindness, cosmetic conditions. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychology Association, USA, 3, 651-652.
53. Speakman, H. G., & Huffman, C. M. (1979). The "fakeability" of the attitudes toward disabled persons scale: Form B. Physical Therapy, 59, 866-869.
54. Strahan, R. U., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous version of marlowe-crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191-193.
55. Stone, E. F., Stone, D. L., & Dipboye, R. L. (1992). Stigmas in organizations: Race, handicaps, and physical unattractiveness. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 385-457). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
56. Swanson, J. E., Rudman, L. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatised behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 73, 207-230.
57. Teachman, B. A., & Woody, S. R. (2003). Automatic processing in spider phobia: Implicit fear associations over the course of treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 100-109.
58. Thomas, A. (2000). Stability of Tringo's hierarchy of preference toward disability groups: 30 years later. Psychological Reports, 86, 1155-1156.
59. Thomas, A. (2001). The multidimensional character of biased perceptions of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67, 3-10.
60. Thomas, A., Palmer, J. K., Coker-Juneau, C. J., & Williams, D. J. (2003). Factor structure and construct validity of the Inter-action with Disabled Persons scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 465-483.
61. Tringo, J. L. (1970). The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups. The Journal of Special Education, 4, 295-306.
62. United States Census Bureau. (1995). Americans with Disabilities: 1994-1995. Retrieved May 13, 2002 from http://ww.census.gov/hhes/www/disable/ sipp/disab9495/asc9495.html
63. United States Census Bureau. (2000a). Labor Force Status - Work disability status of civilians 16 to 74 years old, by sex: 2000. Retrieved January 24, 2002, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/disable/cps/cps200.html
64. United States Census Bureau. (2000b). Work experience and mean earnings in 1999 - Work disability status of civilians 16 to 74 years old, by sex: 2000. Retrieved January 24, 2002, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/disable/cps/ cps300.html
65. Vargo, J. W., & Semple, J. E. (1984). Honest versus fake scores on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale-Form A. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 27, 182-185.
66. Wang, M., Thomas, K. R., Chan, F., & Cheing, G (2003). A conjoint analysis of factors influencing American and Taiwanese college students preferences for people with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 48, 195-201.
67. Yuker, H. E. (1986). The attitudes toward disabled persons scale: Susceptibility to faking. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29, 200-204.
68. Yuker, H. E. (1988). Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
69. Yuker, H., & Block, J. (1986). Research with the Attitude Toward Disabled People Scales: 1960-1985. Hampstead, NY: Holstra University Center for the Study of Attitudes Toward People with Disabilities.
70. Yuker, H. E., Block, J. R., & Campbell, W. J. (1960). A scale to measure attitudes toward disabled persons. (Human Resources Study No. 5). Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center.
71. Yuker, H. E., Block, J. R., & Young, J. H. (1970). The measurement of attitudes toward disabled persons. Rehabilitation Series Number 3. Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center.
72. Zych, K., & Bolton, B. (1972). Galvanic skin responses and cognitive attitudes toward disabled persons. Rehabilitation Psychology, 19, 172-173.