local capture in Balint's syndrome: Effects of groupong and item familiarity

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 115-127

  Shalev, Lilach ^a   Mevorach, Carmel ^b   Humphreys, Glyn W ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF ISRAEL   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BALINT SYNDROME; BRAIN DAMAGE; CASE REPORT; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL LOBE; OCULOMOTOR NERVE DISEASE; PARIETAL LOBE; PATHOGENESIS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STROKE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

ATAXIA; EYE MOVEMENTS; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PARIETAL LOBE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPACE PERCEPTION; SYNDROME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34250632843     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: 14640627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290601017433     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Balint, R. (1909) Seelenlahmung des "Schauens", optische Ataxie, raumliche Storung der Aufmerksamkeit [Psychic paralysis of gaze, optic ataxia, and spatial disorder of attention]. Monatschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, 25, pp. 5-81.
2. Ballaz, C., Boutsen, L., Peyrin, C., Humphreys, G. W. and Marendaz, C. (2005) Visual search for object orientation can be modulated by canonical orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, pp. 20-39.
3. Bundesen, C. (1990) A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, pp. 523-547.
4. Cinel, C. and Humphreys, G. W. (2006) On the relations between implicit and explicit spatial binding: Evidence from Balint's syndrome. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, pp. 127-140.
5. Gilchrist, I., Humphreys, G. W. and Riddoch, M. J. (1996) Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low-level modulation of selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, pp. 1223-1256.
6. Han, S., Humphreys, G. W. and Chen, L. (1999) Parallel and competitive processes in hierarchical analysis: Perceptual grouping and encoding of closure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, pp. 1411-1432.
7. Han, S., Humphreys, G. W. and Chen, L. (1999) Uniform connectedness and classical Gestalt principles of perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, pp. 661-674.
8. Heinke, D. and Humphreys, G. W. (2003) Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: Simulating emergent attentional processes in the Selective Attention for Identification Model (SAIM). Psychological Review, 110, pp. 29-87.
9. Huberle, E. and Karnath, H. -O. (2006) Global shape recognition is modulated by the spatial distance of local elements-evidence from simultanagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 44, pp. 905-911.
10. Hughes, H. C., Fendrich, R. and Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1990) Global versus local processing in the absence of low spatial frequencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, pp. 272-282.
11. Humphreys, G. W. (1998) The neural representation of objects in space: A dual coding account. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 353, pp. 1341-1351.
12. Humphreys, G. W., Cinel, C., Wolfe, J., Olson, A. and Klempen, N. (2000) Fractionating the binding process: Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features. Vision Research, 40, pp. 1569-1596.
13. Humphreys, G. W. and Donnelly, N. (2000) 3-D constraints on spatially parallel shape perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, pp. 1060-1085.
14. Humphreys, G. W., Donnelly, N. and Riddoch, M. J. (1993) Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence. Neuropsychologia, 31, pp. 173-181.
15. Humphreys, G. K., Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S. and Servos, P. (1994) The role of surface information in object recognition: Studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception, 23, pp. 1457-1481.
16. Intriligator, J. and Cavanagh, P. (2001) The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, pp. 171-216.
17. Jackson, G. M., Swainson, R., Mort, D., Husain, M. and Jackson, S. R. (2004) Implicit processing of global information in Balint's syndrome. Cortex, 40, pp. 179-180.
18. Karnath, H. -O. (2003) Neglect. Neuropsychologie, pp. 217-230. Springer, Berlin
19. Karnath, H. -O., Ferber, S. and Bulthoff, H. H. (2000) Neuronal representation of object orientation. Neuropsychologia, 38, pp. 1235-1241.
20. Kastner, S., De Weed, P., Pinsk, M. A., Elizondo, M. I., Desimone, R. and Ungerleider, L. G. (2001) Modulation of sensory suppression: Implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, pp. 1398-1411.
21. Kimchi, R. and Palmer, S. E. (1982) Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, pp. 521-535.
22. Ladavas, E., Petronio, A. and Umilta, C. (1990) The deployment of visual attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients. Cortex, 26, pp. 307-317.
23. Lamb, M. R. and Robertson, L. C. (1988) The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty and stimulus identity. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, pp. 172-181.
24. Navon, D. (1977) Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, pp. 353-383.
25. Peterson, M. A. (1994) Shape recognition can and does occur before figure-ground organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, pp. 105-111.
26. Peterson, M. A., de Geler, B., Rapcsak, S. Z., Gerhardstein, P. C. and Bahoud-Levi, A. -C. (2000) Object memory effects on figure assignment: Conscious object recognition is not necessary of sufficient. Vision Research, 40, pp. 1549-1567.
27. Rafal, R. D. (1997) Balint syndrome. Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology, pp. 337-356. McGraw-Hill, New York
28. Rensink, R. A. and Enns, J. T. (1995) Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, pp. 101-130.
29. Riddoch, M. J. and Humphreys, G. W. (2004) Object identification in simultanagnosia: When wholes are not the sum of their parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, pp. 423-442.
30. Rizzo, M. and Vecera, S. P. (2002) Psychoanatomical substrates of Bálint's syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72, pp. 162-178.
31. Robertson, L. C. and Treisman, A. (2006) Attending to space within and between objects: Implications from a patient with Balint's syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, pp. 448-462.
32. Shalev, L. and Humphreys, G. W. (2002) Implicit location encoding via stored representations of familiar objects: Neuropsychological evidence. Cognitive Neuoropsychology, 19, pp. 721-744.
33. Shalev, L., Humphreys, G. W. and Mevorach, C. (2005) Global processing of compound letters in a patient with Balint's syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, pp. 737-751.
34. Thaiss, L. and De Bleser, R. (1992) Visual agnosia: A case of reduced attentional "spotlights". Cortex, 28, pp. 601-621.
35. Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P. and Green, M. (1994) Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, pp. 495-500.