Object identification in simultanagnosia: When wholes are not the sum of their parts

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 21, Issue 2-4, 2004, Pages 423-441

  Riddoch, M Jane ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; CASE REPORT; COLOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DYSGRAPHIA; DYSLEXIA; DYSPRAXIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 1842524054     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290342000564     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Bálint, R. (1909). Seelenlähmung des "sChauens", optische ataxie, raümliche störung der aufmerksamkeit. Monatschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, 25, 51-81.
2. Behrmann, M., & Kimchi, R. (2003). What does visual agnosia tell us about perceptual organisation and its relation to object perception? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 19-42.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognising depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
4. Blaser, E., & Domini, F. (2002). The conjunction of feature and depth information. Vision Research, 42, 273-279.
5. Boutsen, L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Axis-based grouping reduces extinction. Neuropsychologia, 38, 896-905.
6. Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of category- specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213-261.
7. Cappa, S. F., Frugoni, M., Pasquali, P., Perani, D., & Zorat, F. (1998). Category- specific naming impairment for artefacts. Neurocase, 4, 391-397.
8. Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34.
9. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (1998). Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B 353, 1241-1244.
10. Coslett, H. B., & Saffran, E. (1991). Simultanagnosia: To see but not two see. Brain, 114, 1523-1545.
11. Coslett, B., & Saffran, E. (1992). Simultanagnosia in dementia. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Cognitive deficits in dementia. New York: Academic Press.
12. Edwards, M. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Visual selection and action in Bálints syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 445-462.
13. Forde, E. M. E., & Humphreys, G. W. (Eds.). (2002). Category specificity in brain and mind. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
14. Freeman, E., Driver, J., & Sagi, D. (2003). Top-down modulations of lateral interactions in early vision: Does attention affect integration of the whole or just perception of the parts? Current Biology, 13, 985-989.
15. Friedman-Hill, S. R., Robertson, L. C., Desimone, R., & Ungeleider, L. G. (2003). Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 4263-4268.
16. Friedman-Hill, S., Robertson, L. C., & Treisman, A. (1995). Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science, 269, 853-855.
17. Funnell, E. (2000). Apperceptive agnosia and the visual recognition of object categories in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurocase, 6, 451-463.
18. Garrard, P., Lambon-Ralph, M. A., & Hodges, J. R. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analysis of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 125-174.
19. Gerlach, C. (2001). Structural similarity causes different category effects depending on task characteristics. Neuropsychologia, 39, 895-900.
20. Giersch, A., Humphreys, G. W., Boucart, M., & Kovács, I. (2000). The computation of occluded contours in visual agnosia: Evidence of early computation prior to shape binding and figure-ground coding. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 731-759.
21. Gilchrist, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1996). Grouping and extinction: Evidence for low-level modulation of visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 1223-1249.
22. Hall, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Cooper, A. (2001). Multi-letter units in reading: Evidence from attentional dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 439-467.
23. Hummel, J. E. (2001). Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition. Visual Cognition, 8, 489-517.
24. Hummel, J. E., & Stankiewicz (1998). Two roles for attention in shape perception: A structural description model of visual scrutiny. Visual Cognition, 5, 49-79.
25. Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Neural representation of objects in space: A dual coding account. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B353, 1341-1352.
26. Humphreys, G. W., & Force, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category- specific" Neuropsychological deficits. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 24, 453-509.
27. Humphreys, G. W., & Price, C. J. (1994). Visual feature discrimination in simultanagnosia: A study of two cases. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 393-434.
28. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1984). Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 385-415.
29. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1993). Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV (pp. 143-162). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
30. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2003a). From vision to action, and action to vision: A convergent route approach to vision, action and attention. In D. Irwin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 42). New York: Academic Press.
31. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2003b). A case series analysis of "DAtegory- specific" deficits of living things: The HIT account. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 263-306.
32. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2003). From what to where: Neuropsychological evidence for implicit interactions between object- and space-based attention. Psychological Science, 14, 487-492.
33. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1985). Interactive processes in perceptual organisation: Evidence from visual agnosia. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
34. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103
35. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., Donnelly, N., Freeman, T., Boucart, M., & Müller, H. M. (1994a). Intermediate visual processing and visual agnosia. In M. J. Farah & G. Ratcliff (Eds.), The neuropsychology of high-level vision: Collected tutorial essays. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
36. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., Quinlan, P. T., Donnelly, N., & Price, C. A. (1992). Parallel pattern processing and visual agnosia. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 377-416.
37. Humphreys, G. W., Romani, C., Olson, A., Riddoch, M. J., & Duncan, J. (1994b). Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans. Nature, 372, 357-359.
38. Kanwisher, N., & Wojciulik, E. 2000. Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging. Nature Reviews (Neuroscience), 1, 91-100
39. Karnath, H.-O., Ferber, S., Rorden, C., & Driver, J. (2000). The fate of global information in dorsal simultanagnosia. Neurocase, 6, 295-306.
40. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). PALPA: Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
41. Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M., & Patterson, K. (2003). Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 30-46.
42. Kinsbourne, M., & Warrington, E. K. (1962). A disorder of simultaneous form perception. Brain, 85, 461-486.
43. Kinsbourne, M., & Warrington, E. K. (1963). Limited visual form perception. Brain, 86, 697-705.
44. Kuçera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). A computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
45. Kumada, T., & Humphreys, G. W. (2001). Lexical recovery from extinction: Interactions between visual form and stored knowledge modulate visual selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 465-478.
46. Laeng, B., Carlesimo, G. A., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2002). Rigid and nonrigid objects in canonical and noncanonical views. Hemisphere effects on object identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 697-720.
47. LaCs, K. R., & Neve, C. (1999). A "nOrmal" category specific effect for living things. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1263-1269.
48. Luria, A. R. (1959). Disorders of "sImultaneous perception" in a case of bilateral occipito-parietal brain injury. Brain, 82, 437-449.
49. Luria, A. R., Pravdina-Vinaskkaya, E. N., & Yarbus, A. L. (1963). Disorders of ocular movement in a case of simultanagnosia. Brain, 86, 219-228.
50. McRae, K., & Cree, G. S. (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category-specificity in mind and brain. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
51. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Devlin, J. T. (2002). The emergence of category-specific deficits in a distributed semantic system. In E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category-specificity in mind and brain. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
52. Naor-Raz, G., Tarr, M. J., & Kersten, D. (in press). Is colour an intrinsic property of object representations? Perception.
53. Palmer, S., & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organisation: The role of uniform consecutiveness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 29-55.
54. Pollman, S., Weider, R., Humphreys, G. W., Olivers, C. N. L., Mûller, K., Lohmann, G., Wiggins, C. J., & Watson, D. G. (2003 . Separating segmentation and target detection in posterior parietal cortex: An event-related fMRI study of visual marking. NeuroImage, 18, 310-323.
55. Price, C.J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorisation and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 797-828.
56. Price, C. J., Noppeney, U., Phillips, J., & Devlin, J. T. (2003). How is the fusiform gyrus related to category-specificity? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 561-574.
57. Quinlan, P. T. (1992). The Oxford Psycholinguistics database. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. (1995). Pre-emption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
59. Ricci, R., Vaishnavi, S., & Chatterjee, A. (1999). A deficit of intermediate vision: Experimental observations and theoretical implications. Neurocase, 5, 1-12.
60. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). A case of integrative agnosia. Brain, 110, 1431-1462.
61. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). BORB: The Birmingham Object Recognition Battery. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
62. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Edwards, M. G. (2000a). Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing object selection from action (effector) selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 547-562.
63. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Edwards, M. G. (2000b). Visual affordances and object selection. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Edwards, M. G. (2001). An experimental analysis of anarchic lower limb action. Neuropsychologia, 39, 574-579.
65. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Gannon, T., Blott, W., & Jones, V. (1999). Memories are made of this: The effects of time on stored visual knowledge in a case of visual agnosia. Brain, 122, 537-559.
66. Sacchett, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 73-86.
67. Shalev, L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Implicit location encoding via stored representations of familiar objects: Neuropsychological evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 721-744.
68. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. A. (1980). A standardised set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, familiarity and name complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
69. Tanaka, J. W., & Presnell, L. M. (1999). Colour diagnosticity in object recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 1140-1153.
70. Tanaka, J. W., Weiskopf, D., & Williams, P. (2001). The role of colour in high-level vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 211-215.
71. Thomas, R., & Forde, E. M. E. (in press). The role of local and global processing in the recognition of living and nonliving things. Neurocase.
72. Thomas, R., Forde, E. M. E., Humphreys, G. W., & Graham, K. S. (2002). The effects of the passage of time on a patient with category-specific agnosia. Neurocase, 8, 466-479.
73. Vecera, S. P., & Behrmann, M. (1997). Spatial attention does not require preattentive grouping. Neuropsychology, 11, 30-43.
74. Warrington, E. K., & James, M. (Eds.). (1991). VOSP: The Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
75. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. (1983). C ategory- specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106, 859-878.
76. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. (1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionation and an attempted integration. Brain, 110, 1273-1296.