3-D constraints on spatially parallel shape perception

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1060-1085

  Humphreys, Glyn W ^a   Donnelly, Nick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION;

ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTUAL CLOSURE; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0034223322     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212089     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. APPELLE, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The "oblique effect" in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266-278.
2. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
3. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1994). Parallel computation of symmetry but not repetition within single visual shapes. Visual Cognition, 1, 377-400.
4. CRICK, F. (1984). Function of the thalamic reticular complex: The search light hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 81, 4586-4590.
5. DAVIS, G., & DRIVER, J. (1998). Kanisza subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 169-184.
6. DONNELLY, N., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1991). Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 561-570.
7. DONNELLY, N., WEEKES, B., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & ALBON, A. (1998). Processes involved in the computation of a shape description. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1119-1130.
8. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
9. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
10. ELDER, J., & ZUCKER, S. (1993). The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes. Vision Research, 33, 981-991.
11. ENNS, J., & RENSINK, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
12. ENNS, J., & RENSINK, R. A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review, 98, 335-351.
13. ESSOCK, E. A. (1980). The oblique effect of stimulus identification with respect to two classes of oblique effects. Perception, 9, 37-46.
14. FOSTER, D. H., & WARD, P. A. (1991a). Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 243, 75-81.
15. FOSTER, D. H., & WARD, P. A. (1991b). Horizontal-vertical filters in early vision predict anomalous line-orientation identification frequencies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 243, 83-86.
16. GILCHRIST, I., HUMPHREYS, G. W., RIDDOCH, M. J., & NEUMANN, H. (1997). Luminance and edge information in grouping: A study using visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 464-480.
17. HUMPHREYS, G. W., KEULERS, N., & DONNELLY, N. (1994). Parallel visual coding in three dimensions. Perception, 23, 453-470.
18. HUMPHREYS, G. W., QUINLAN, P. T., & RIDDOCH, M. J. (1989). Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 258-279.
19. HUMPHREYS, G. W., & WATSON, D. G. (2000). Parallel template-based matching of facial features. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. KOSSLYN, S. M., ALPERT, N. M., & THOMPSON, W. L. (1995). Identifying objects at different levels of hierarchy: A position emission tomography study. Human Brain Mapping, 3, 107-132.
21. MULLER, J. A., & DAWSON, R. J. M. (1990). Reconstructing polyhedral scenes from single two-dimensional images: The orthogonality hypothesis. In P. K. Patel-Schneider (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial Conference of the CSCSI (pp. 238-244). Palo Alto, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
22. PERKINS, D. N. (1968). Cubic corners. MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report, 98, 207-214.
23. POTTER, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 509-522.
24. QUINLAN, P. T., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1987). Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 455-472.
25. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
26. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489-2505.
27. THORPE, S., & IMBERT, M. (1989). Biological constraints on connectionist modelling. In R. Pfeifer, Z. Schreter, F. Fogelman-Soulie, & L. Steels (Eds.), Connectionism in Perspective (pp. 63-92). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28. TOVEE, M. J., & ROLES, E. T. (1995). Information encoding in short firing rate epochs by single neurons in the primate temporal cortex. Visual Cognition, 2, 35-58.
29. TREISMAN, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing, 31, 156-177.
30. TREISMAN, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
31. TREISMAN, A. (1998). Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 353, 1295-1306.
32. TREISMAN, A., & GELADE, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
33. TREISMAN, A., & SOUTHER, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-310.