Catalyzed tandem reaction of 3-silyloxy-1,5-enynes consisting of cyclization and pinacol rearrangement

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 46, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 2310-2313

  Kirsch, Stefan F ^a   Binder, Jörg T ^a   Crone, Benedikt ^a   Duschek, Alexander ^a   Haug, Timm T ^a   Liébert, Clémence ^a   Menz, Helge ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cyclization; Domino reactions; Gold; Homogeneous catalysis; Rearrangement

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; CATALYSTS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; CYCLIZATION; GOLD; HOMOGENIZATION METHOD; SILVER;

CARBOCYCLIZATION; CYCLOPENTENES; DOMINO REACTIONS; PINACOL; PINACOL REARRANGEMENT;

OLEFINS;

ALKYNE; SILOXANE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; CYCLIZATION; STEREOISOMERISM;

ALKYNES; CYCLIZATION; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; SILOXANES; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 34250333483     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200604544     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. For a review, see: L. E. Overman, L. D. Pennington, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7143.
2. For additional examples, see: a) J.-H. Youn, J. Lee, J. K. Cha, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2935;
3. b) B. M. Trost, A. Brandi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5041.
4. For reviews on domino reactions, see: a) K. C. Nicolaou, D. J. Edmonds, P. G. Bulger, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 7292;
5. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7134;
6. b) L. F. Tietze, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115.
7. N. Hanaki, J. T. Link, D. W. C. MacMillan, L. E. Overman, W. G. Trankle, J. A. Wurster, Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 223.
8. A. D. Lebsack, L. E. Overman, R. J. Valentekovich, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4851.
9. L. E. Overman, J. P. Wolfe, J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6421.
10. a) S. F. Kirsch, J. T. Binder, C. Liébert, H. Menz, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 6010;
11. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5878;
12. b) E. Jiménez-Núñez, C. K. Claverie, C. Nieto-Oberhuber, A. M. Echavarren, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 5578;
13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5452;
14. c) J. P. Markham, S. T. Staben, F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9708.
15. a) H. Menz, S. F. Kirsch, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4795;
16. b) J. T. Binder, S. F. Kirsch, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2151;
17. c) M. H. Suhre, M. Reif, S. F. Kirsch, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3925.
18. For catalytic cycloisomerizations of 1,5-enynes with a concomitant nucleophilic trapping, see: a) L. Zhang, S. A. Kozmin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6962;
19. b) M. R. Luzung, J. P. Markham, F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10858.
20. For further work in 1,5-enyne cycloisomerizations involving π activation, see: a) S. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14274;
21. b) J. Sun, M. P. Conley, L. Zhang, S. A. Kozmin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9705;
22. c) N. Marion, P. de Fremont, G. Lemiere, E. D. Stevens, L. Fensterbank, M. Malacria, S. P. Nolan, Chem. Commun. 2006, 2048;
23. d) F. Gagosz, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4129;
24. e) V. Mamane, T. Gress, H. Krause, A. Fürstner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8654.
25. Reviews on transition-metal-catalyzed reactions of enynes: a) S. Ma, S. Yu, Z. Gu, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 206;
26. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 200;
27. b) C. Bruneau, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 2380;
28. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2328;
29. c) A. M. Echavarren, C. Nevado, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 431;
30. d) S. T. Diver, A. Giessert, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1317.
31. For selected examples on sequences proceeding by π activation with concomitant nucleophilic trapping, see, for example: Alkynes: a) P. Y. Toullec, E. Genin, L. Leseurre, J.-P. Genêt, V. Michelet, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 7587;
32. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7427;
33. b) J. Barluenga, A. Diéguez, A. Fernández, F. Rodríguez, F. J. Fañanás, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 2145;
34. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2091;
35. c) C. Nieto-Oberhuber, M. P. Muñoz, S. López, E. Jiménez-Núñez, C. Nevado, E. Herrero-Gómez, M. Raducan, A. M. Echavarren, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1677;
36. d) V. Belting, N. Krause, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4489;
37. e) A. S. K. Hashmi, M. C. Blanco, E. Kurpejović, W. Frey, J. W. Bats, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 709;
38. f) A. Fürstner, P. W. Davies, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15024;
39. g) C. Nieto-Oberhuber, M. P. Muñoz, E. Buñuel, C. Nevado, D. J. Cárdenas, A. M. Echavarren, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 2456;
40. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2402;
41. h) C. Nevado, D. J. Cárdenas, A. M. Echavarren, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 2627;
42. i) A. S. K. Hashmi, L. Schwarz, J.-H. Choi, T. M. Frost, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 2382;
43. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2285;
44. Alkenes: j) A. Fürstner, C. Aïssa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6306;
45. k) J. H. Koh, M. R. Gagné, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 3451;
46. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3459.
47. For reviews on gold catalysis, see: a) E. Jiménez- Núñez, A. M. Echavarren, Chem. Commun. 2007, 333;
48. b) A. S. K. Hashmi, G. J. Hutchings Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 8064;
49. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7896;
50. c) A. S. K. Hashmi, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 7150;
51. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6990;
52. d) A. Hoffmann-Röder, N. Krause, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 387.
53. For recent examples of Au-catalyzed domino processes, see: a) P. Dubé, F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12062;
54. b) D. Hildebrandt, G. Dyker, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6728;
55. c) J. Zhao, C. O. Hughes, F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7436;
56. d) I. V. Seregin, V. Gevorgyan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12050;
57. e) C. Nieto-Oberhuber, S. López, E. Jiménez- Núñez, A. M. Echavarren, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 5916;
58. f) J. Zhang, H.-G. Schmalz, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 6856;
59. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6704;
60. g) A. L. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16804;
61. h) A. S. K. Hashmi, L. Grundl, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6231.
62. S. T. Staben, J. J. Kennedy-Smith, D. Huang, B. K. Corkey, R. L. LaLonde, F. D. Toste, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 6137;
63. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5991.
64. Addition of tBuOH (1.1 equiv) provided 2a in 86% yield, while the use of MeOH produced a mixture of unidentified compounds.
65. The rearrangement of 1,5-enyne precursors was strictly limited to substrates that contain alkenes bearing an additional substituent at C2. Attempted rearrangement of 1,2-disubstituted alkenes afforded at most trace amounts of the desired cyclopentene under the reaction conditions. In these cases, the formation of the major product can be rationalized by a sequence consisting of elimination and subsequent hydration of the triple bond.
66. 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixtures.
67. a) L. E. Overman, Angew. Chem. 1984, 96, 565;
68. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 579;
69. b) B. D. Sherry, F. D. Toste, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15978.
70. I, see: N. Morita, N. Krause, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 1930;
71. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1897, and references therein.
72. 3CN, 11 %]: T. Yao, X. Zhang, R. C. Larock, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7679, and references herein.
73. For examples of trapping vinylgold species by electrophilic iodine, see: a) A. Buzas, F. Gagosz, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 515;
74. b) A. Buzas, F. Istrate, F. Gagosz, Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1957;
75. c) A. Buzas, F. Gagosz, Synlett 2006, 2727.