Biomass partitioning in red pine (Pinus resinosa) along a chronosequence in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 93-102

  King, J S ^a   Giardina, C P ^b,d   Pregitzer, K S ^c   Friend, A L ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CARBON; ECOSYSTEMS;

BIOMASS PARTITIONING; CHRONOSEQUENCE; COARSE ROOT GROWTH; RED PINES;

FORESTRY;

BELOWGROUND BIOMASS; BIOMASS ALLOCATION; CARBON CYCLE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CHRONOSEQUENCE; CONIFEROUS TREE; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; ROOT-SHOOT RATIO; ROOTING;

BIOMASS; CARBON; ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY;

MICHIGAN; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; UPPER PENINSULA;

PINUS RESINOSA;

EID: 34250328034     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X06-217     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alban, D.H., and Laidly, P.R. 1982. Generalized biomass equations for jack and red pine in the Lake States. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 913-921.
2. Albaugh, T.J, Allen, H.L., Dougherty, P.M., Kress, L.W., and King, J.S. 1998. Leaf area and above- and belowground growth responses of loblolly pine to nutrient and water additions. For. Sci. 44: 317-328.
3. Albaugh, T.J, Allen, H.L., Doughtery, P.M., and Johnsen, K.H. 2004. Long term growth responses of loblolly pine to optimal nutrient and water resource availability. For. Ecol. Manage. 192: 3-19.
4. Albert, D.A. 1995. Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: a working map and classification. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-178.
5. Axelsson, E., and Axelsson, B. 1986. Changes in carbon allocation patterns in spruce and pine trees following irrigation and fertilization. Tree Physiol. 2: 189-204.
6. Baskerville, G.L. 1972. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can. J. For. Res. 2: 49-53.
7. Birdsey, R.A., and Heath, L.S. 1995. Carbon changes in U.S. forests. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-271. pp. 56-70.
8. Birdsey, R.A., and Heath, L.S. 2001. Forest inventory data, models, and assumptions for monitoring carbon flux. In Soil carbon sequestration and the greenhouse effect. Spec. Publ. 57, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wis. pp. 125-135.
9. Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H., and Baumgardner, G.A. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia, 111: 1-11.
10. Cannell, M.G.R. 1985. Dry matter partitioning in tree crops. In Attributes of trees as crop plants. Natural Environment Research Council, Swindon, UK. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, UK. pp. 160-193.
11. Cannell, M.G.R., and Dewar, R.C. 1994. Carbon allocation in trees: a review of concepts for modeling. Adv. Ecol. Res. 25: 59-104.
12. Chen, H., Harmon, M.E., and Griffiths, R.P. 2001. Decomposition and nitrogen release from decomposing woody roots in coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest: a chronosequence approach. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 246-260.
13. Cole, D.W., and Rapp, M. 1981. Elemental cycling in forest ecosystems. In Dynamic properties of forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 341-409.
14. Cuevas, E., Brown, S., and Lugo, A.E. 1991. Above- and belowground organic matter storage and production in a tropical pine plantation and a paired broadleaf secondary forest. Plant Soil, 135: 257-268.
15. Dixon, R.K., Brown, S., Hougton, R.A., Solomon, A.M., Trexler, M.C., and Wisniewski, J. 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science (Washington, D.C), 263: 185-190.
16. Dorr, J.A., Jr., and Eschman, D.F. 1970. The geology of Michigan. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich..
17. Enquist, B.J. 2002. Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. Tree Physiol. 22: 1045-1064.
18. Fowler, D.P., and Morris, R.W. 1977. Genetic diversity in red pine: evidence for low genic heterozygosity. Can. J. For. Res. 7: 343-347.
19. 2 and changing N availability. New Phytol. 134: 85-93.
20. Gedroc, J.J., McConnaughay, K.D.M., and Coleman, J.S. 1996. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Punct. Ecol. 10: 44-50.
21. Gerhardt, K., and Fredriksson, D. 1995. Biomass allocation by broad-leaved mahogany seedlings, Swietenia macrophylla (King), in abandoned pasture and secondary dry forest in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Biotropica, 27: 174-182.
22. Gholz, H.L., and Fisher, R.F. 1982. Organic matter production and distribution in slash pine (Pinus elliottii) plantations. Ecology, 63: 1827-1839.
23. Giardina, C.P., and Ryan, M. 2002. Total belowground carbon allocation in a fast growing Eucalyptus plantation using a carbon balance approach. Ecosystems, 5: 487-499.
24. Giardina, C.P., Coleman, M.D., Hancock, J.E., King, J.S., Lilleskov, E.A., Loya, W.M., Pregitzer, K.S., Ryan, M.G., and Trettin, C.G. 2005. The response of belowground carbon allocation in forests to global change. In Tree species effects on soils: implications for global change. Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. pp. 119-154.
25. Gower, S.T., Haynes, B.E., Fassnacht, K.S., Running, S.W., and Hunt, E.R., Jr. 1993. Influence of fertilization on the allometric relations for two pines in contrasting environments. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 1704-1711.
26. Gower, S.T., Gholz, H.L., Nakane, K., and Baldwin, V.C. 1994. Production and carbon allocation patterns of pine forests. Ecol. Bull. 43: 115-135.
27. Grier, C.C., Vogt, K.A., Keyes, M.R., and Edmonds, R.L. 1981. Biomass distribution and above- and below-ground production in young and mature Abies amabilis zone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 155-167.
28. Haynes, B.E., and Gower, S.T. 1995. Belowground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilized red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin. Tree Physiol. 15: 317-325.
29. Heath, L.S., Smith, J.E., and Birdsey, R.A. 2003. Carbon trends in U.S. forestlands: a context for the role of soils in forest carbon sequestration. In The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 127-134.
30. Houghton, R.A. 2001. Global terrestrial productivity and carbon balance. In Terrestrial global productivity. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. pp. 499-520.
31. Jackson, R.B., Jobbagy, E.C., Avissar, R., Roy, S.B., Barrett, D.J., Cook, C.W., Farley, K.A., le Maitre, D.C., McCarl, B.A., and Murray, B.C. 2005. Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science (Washington, D.C.), 310: 1944-1947.
32. Jenkins, J.C., Chojnacky, D.C., Heath, L.S., and Birdsey, R.A. 2003. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For. Sci. 49: 12-35.
33. Kinerson, R.S., Ralston, C.W., and Wells, C.G. 1977. Carbon cycling in a loblolly pine plantation. Oecologia, 29: 1-10.
34. 2, temperature and nitrogen. Tree Physiol. 16: 635-642.
35. King, J.S., Albaugh, T.J., Allen, L.H., and Kress, L.W. 1999. Stand-level allometry in Pinus taeda as affected by irrigation and fertilization. Tree Physiol. 19: 769-778.
36. King, J.S., Albaugh, T.J., Allen, H.L., Buford, M., Strain, B.R., and Dougherty, P. 2002. Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine. New Phytol. 154: 389-398.
37. 2 and varying soil resource availability. Oecologia, 146: 318-328.
38. Li, Z., Kurz, W.A., Apps, M.J., and Beukema, S.J. 2003. Belowground biomass dynamics in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian forest sector: recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 126-136.
39. Litton, C.M., Ryan, M.G., Tinker, D.B., and Knight, D.H. 2003. Belowground and aboveground biomass in young postfire lodgepole pine forests of contrasting tree density. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 351-363.
40. Loya, W.M., Pregitzer, K.S., Karberg, N.J., King, J.S., and Giardina, C.P. 2003. Reduction of soil carbon formation by tropospheric ozone under increased carbon dioxide levels. Nature (London), 425: 705-707.
41. Ludovici, K.H., Zarnoch, S.J., and Richter, D.D. 2002. Modeling in-situ pine root decomposition using data from a 60-year chronosequence. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 1675-1684.
42. Mosseler, A., Innes, D.J., and Roberts, B.A. 1991. Lack of allozymic variation in disjunct Newfoundland populations of red pine (Pinus resinosa). Can. J. For. Res. 21: 525-528.
43. Mosseler, A., Egger, K.N., and Hughes, G.A. 1992. Low levels of genetic diversity in red pine confirmed by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 1332-1337.
44. Mund, M., Kummetz, E., Hein, M., Bauer, G.A., and Schulze, E.-D. 2002. Growth and carbon stocks of a spruce forest chronosequence in central Europe. For. Ecol. Manage. 171: 275-296.
45. Nadelhoffer, K.J. 2000. The potential effects of nitrogen deposition on fine-root production in forest ecosystems. New Phytol. 147: 131-139.
46. 15N-enriched additions to an oak forest and a red pine plantation. Ecol. Appl. 9: 72-86.
47. Naidu, S.L., DeLucia, E.H., and Thomas, R.B. 1998. Contrasting patterns of biomass allocation in dominant and suppressed loblolly pine. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 1116-1124.
48. Nilsson, U., and Hällgren, J.-E. 1993. Changes in growth allocation owing to competition for light in young fertilized Norway spruce trees. For. Ecol. Manage. 62: 157-172.
49. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ. 22: 683-714.
50. Ovington, J.D. 1957. Dry-matter partitioning by Pinus sylvestris L. Ann. Bot. 21: 287-314.
51. Pregitzer, K.S. 2002. Fine roots of trees - a new perspective. New Phytol. 154: 267-273.
52. Pregitzer, K.S. 2003. Carbon cycling in forest ecosystems with an emphasis on belowground processes. In The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 93-107.
53. Proe, M.F., and Millard, P. 1994. Relationships between nutrient supply, nitrogen partitioning and growth in young Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). Tree Physiol. 14: 75-88.
54. Reed, D.D., Mroz, G.D., Liechty, H.O., Jones, E.A., Cattelino, P.J., Balster, N.J., and Zhang, Y. 1995. Above- and below-ground biomass of precompetitive red pine in northern Michigan. Can. J. For. Res. 25: 1064-1069.
55. Rudolf, P.O. 1990. Pinus resinosa Ait. Red pine. In Silvics of North America. Vol. 1. Conifers. Handb. 654.USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C. pp. 442-455.
56. Schimel, D.S. 1995. Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biol. 1: 77-91.
57. Vogt, K.A. 1991. Carbon budgets of temperate forest ecosystems. Tree Physiol. 9: 69-86.