Belowground and aboveground biomass in young postfire lodgepole pine forests of contrasting tree density

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 351-363

  Litton, Creighton M ^a   Ryan, Michael G ^b,c   Tinker, Daniel B ^d   Knight, Dennis H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^d WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS;

TREE DENSITY;

FORESTRY;

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; BELOWGROUND BIOMASS; BIOMASS ALLOCATION; CONIFEROUS FOREST; FOREST FIRE; POPULATION DENSITY;

BIOMASS; FORESTRY; PINUS; PLANT TISSUES;

PINUS CONTORTA;

EID: 0242584434     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x02-181     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Albaugh, T.J., Allen, H.L., Dougherty, P.M., Kress, L.W., and King, J.S. 1998. Leaf area and above- and belowground growth responses of loblolly pine to nutrient and water additions. For. Sci. 44: 317-328.
2. Bates, D.M., and Watts, D.G. 1988. Nonlinear regression analysis and its application. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
3. Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H., and Baumgardner, G.A. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia, 111: 1-11.
4. Cannell, M.G.R. 1982. World forest biomass and primary production data. Academic Press, London.
5. Comeau, P.G., and Kimmins, J.P. 1989. Above- and below-ground biomass and production of lodgepole pine on sites with differing soil moisture regimes. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 447-454.
6. Despain, D.G. 1990. Yellowstone vegetation: consequences of environment and history in a natural setting. Roberts Rinehart Publishers, Boulder, Colo.
7. Dirks, R.A., and Martner, B.E. 1982. The climate of Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks. U.S. Dep. Inter. NPS Occas. Pap. 6.
8. Duan, N. 1983. Smearing estimates: a nonparametric retransformation method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78: 605-610.
9. Fogel, R., and Hunt, G. 1979. Fungal and arboreal biomass in a western Oregon Douglas-fir ecosystem: distribution patterns and turnover. Can. J. For. Res. 9: 245-256.
10. Gholz, H.L., and Fisher, R.F. 1982. Organic matter production and distribution in slash pine (Pinus elliottii) plantations. Ecology, 63: 1827-1839.
11. Gholz, H.L., Hendry, L.C., and Cropper, W.P., Jr. 1986. Organic matter dynamics of fine roots in plantations of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) in north Florida. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 529-538.
12. Gower, S.T., Vogt, K.A., and Grier, C.C. 1992. Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 43-65.
13. Gower, S.T., Gholz, H.L., Nakane, K., and Baldwin, C. 1994. Production and carbon allocation patterns of pine forests. Ecol. Bull. 43: 115-135.
14. Gower, S.T., Krankina, O., Olson, R.J., Apps, M., Linder, S., and Wang, C. 2001. Net primary production and carbon allocation patterns of boreal forest ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 11: 1395-1411.
15. Grulke, N.A., and Retzlaff, W.A. 2001. Changes in physiological attributes of ponderosa pine from seedling to mature tree. Tree Physiol. 21: 275-286.
16. Günther, B., and Morgado, E. 1996. Allometric algorithms. Biol. Res. 29: 345-353.
17. Harvey, L.D.D. 2000. Box models of the terrestrial biosphere. In The carbon cycle. Edited by T.M.L. Wigley and D.S. Schimel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. pp. 238-247.
18. Jackson, R.B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J.R., Mooney, H.A., Sala, O.E., and Schulze, E.D. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomas. Oecologia, 108: 389-411.
19. Keyes, M.R., and Grier, C.C. 1981. Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 599-605.
20. Knight, D.H., Vose, J.M., Baldwin, V.C., Ewel, K.C., and Grodzinska, K. 1994. Contrasting patterns in pine forest ecosystems. Ecol. Bull. 43: 9-19.
21. Körner, C. 1994. Biomass fractionation in plants: a reconsideration of definitions based on plant functions. In A whole plant perspective on carbon-nitrogen interactions. Edited by J. Roy and E. Garnier. SPB Academic, The Hague, Netherlands. pp. 173-185.
22. Kurz, W.A. 1989. Net primary production, production allocation, and foliage efficiency in second growth Douglas-fir stands with differing site quality. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
23. Melillo, J.M., McGuire, A.D., Kicklighter, A.D., Moore, B., III, Vorsmarty, C.J., and Schloss, A.L. 1993. Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature (London), 363: 234-240.
24. Nemeth, J.C. 1973. Dry matter production in young loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) plantations. Ecol. Monogr. 43: 21-41.
25. Oleksyn, J., Reich, P.B., Chalupka, W., and Tjoelker, M.G. 1999. Differential above- and below-ground biomass accumulation of European Pinus sylvestris populations in a 12-yr-old provenance experiment. Scand. J. For. Res. 14: 7-17.
26. Parresol, B.R. 1993. Modeling multiplicative error variance: an example predicting tree diameter from stump dimensions in baldcypress. For. Sci. 39: 670-679.
27. Parresol, B.R. 2001. Additivity of nonlinear biomass equations. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 865-878.
28. Pearson, J.A., Fahey, T.J., and Knight, D.H. 1984. Biomass and leaf area in contrasting lodgepole pine forests. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 259-265.
29. Pearson, J.A., Knight, D.H., and Fahey, T.J. 1987. Biomass and nutrient accumulation during stand development in Wyoming lodgepole pine forests. Ecology, 68: 1966-1973.
30. Peer, R.K. 1981. Changes in biomass and production during secondary forest succession. In Forest succession: concepts and applications. Edited by D.C. West, H.H. Shugart, and D.B. Botkin. Springer, New York. pp. 324-338.
31. Running, S.W., Thornton, P.E., Nemani, R., and Glassy, J.M. 2000. Global terrestrial gross and net primary productivity from the earth observing system. In Methods in ecosystem science. Edited by O.E. Sala, R.B. Jackson, H. Mooney, and R.W. Howarth. Springer-Verlag, New York. pp. 44-57.
32. SPSS Inc. 1999. Base 10.0 applications guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Ill.
33. Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., and Korzukhin, M. 1997. Biomass equations of sixty-five North American tree species. For. Ecol. Manage. 97: 1-24.
34. Trettin, C.C. 1986. Characterization of soils in Yellowstone National Park. Natl. Park Serv. Proj. Rep. CX-1200-1-B027-233.
35. Turner, M.G., Hargrove, W.W., Gardner, R.H., and Romme, W.H. 1994. Effects of fire on landscape heterogeneity in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 731-742.
36. Turner, M.G., Romme, W.H., Gardner, R.H., and Hargrove, W.W. 1997. Effects of fire size and pattern on early succession in Yellowstone National Park. Ecol. Monogr. 67: 411-433.
37. Vogt, K.A., Edmonds, R.L., Grier, C.C., and Piper, S.R. 1980. Seasonal changes in mycorrhizal and fibrous-textured root biomass in 23- and 180-year-old Pacific silver fir stands in western Washington. Can. J. For. Res. 10: 523-529.
38. Waring, R.H., and Running, S.W. 1998. Forest ecosystems: analysis at multiple scales. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
39. Whitlock, C. 1993. Postglacial vegetation and climate of Grand Teton and Yellowstone National Parks. Ecol. Monogr. 63: 173-198.