Molecular evidence for hybrid origin of Quercus crenata Lam. (Fagaceae) from Q. cerris L. and Q. suber L.

Plant Biosystems

Volumn 141, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 181-193

  Conte, L ^a   Cotti, C ^a   Cristofolini, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

DNA markers; Hybridization; Introgression; ISSR; RAPD

Indexed keywords

FAGACEAE; QUERCUS CERRIS; QUERCUS CRENATA;

EID: 34250320171     PISSN: 11263504     EISSN: 17245575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11263500701401463     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Archibald JK, Wolfe AD, Johnson SD. 2004. Hybridization and gene flow between a day- and night-flowering species of Zaluzianskya (Scrophulariaceae s.s., tribe Manuleeae). Am J Bot 91:1333-1344.
2. Bacon JR, Spellenberg R. 1996. Hybridization in two distantly related Mexican black oaks Quercus conzattii and Quercus eduardii (Fagaceae: Quercus: Section Lobatae). Sida 17:17-41.
3. Barbero M, Loisel R, Ozenda P. 1972. Répartition et écologie de Quercus cerris et Quercus crenata dans les Alpes maritimes et ligures. Bull Soc Bot Fr 119:121-126.
4. Bassam BJ, Caetano-Annollés G, Gresshoff PM. 1991. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 196:80-83.
5. Belahbib N, Pemonge MH, Ouassou A, Sbay H, Kremer A, Petit RJ. 2001. Frequent cytoplasmic exchanges between oak species that are not closely related: Quercus suber and Q. ilex in Morocco. Mol Ecol 10:2003-2012.
6. Bellarosa R, Schirone B, Maggini F, Fineschi S. 1996. Inter- and intraspecific variation in three mediterranean oaks (Q. cerris, Q. suber, Q. crenata). In: Proceeding of the Workshop on interand intraspecific variation in European oaks: Evolutionary implications and practical consequences, 15-16 June 1994, Brussels, Belgium. Official Publication of the European Communities. pp. 239-276.
7. Bellarosa R, Simeone MC, Schirone B. 2003a. Italy. In: Bozzano M, Turok J, editors. EUFORGEN Mediterranean Oaks Network, Report of the 2nd meeting, 2-4 May 2002, Gozo, Malta. Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. pp. 35-41.
8. Bellarosa R, Simeone MC, Schirone B. 2003b. Germplasm conservation of Mediterranean oaks in Italy: distribution and genetic structure of cork oak (Quercus suber L.). In: Bozzano M, Turok J, editors. EUFORGEN Mediterranean Oaks Network, Report of the 2nd meeting, 2-4 May 2002, Gozo, Malta. Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. pp. 5-12.
9. Bellarosa R, Simeone M, Papini A, Schirone B. 2005. Utility of ITS sequence data for phylogenetic reconstruction of Italian Quercus spp. Mol Phylog Evol 34:355-370.
10. Bodénès C, Joandet S, Laigret F, Kremer A. 1997. Detection of genomic regions differentiating two closely related oak species Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. Heredity 78:433-444.
11. Bruschi P, Vendramin GG, Bussotti F, Grossoni P. 2000. Morphological and molecular differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae) in Northern and Central Italy. Ann Bot 85:325-333.
12. Buerkle CA. 2005. Maximum-likelihood estimation of a hybrid index based on molecular markers. Mol Ecol Notes 5:684-687. Available at: http://www.uwyo.edu/buerkle/hindex.
13. Burgess KS, Morgan M, Deverno L, Husband BC. 2005. Asymmetrical introgression between two Morus species (M. alba, M. rubra) that differ in abundance. Mol Ecol 14:3471-3483.
14. Careddu MB, Vogiatzakis IN. 2003. Mapping the distribution and extent of Quercus suber habitats in Sardinia: a literature review and a proposed methodology. Geographical Paper No 171. Reading, UK: The University of Reading.
15. Carney SE, Gardner KE, Rieseberg LH. 2000. Evolutionary changes over the fifty-year history of a hybrid population of sunflowers (Helianthus). Evolution 54:462-474.
16. Coart E, Lamote V, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E, Lootens P, Roldán-Ruiz I. 2002. AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species [Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] in Flemish populations. Theor Appl Genet 105:431-439.
17. Colless DH. 1980. Congruence between morphometric and allozyme data for Menidia species: a reappraisal. Syst Zool 29:288-299.
18. Conte L, Cotti C, Schicchi R, Raimondo FM, Cristofolini G. 2004. Detection of ephemeral genetic sub-structure in the narrow endemic Abies nebrodensis (Lojac.) Mattei (Pinaceae) using RAPD markers. Plant Biosyst 138:279-289.
19. Craft KJ, Ashley MV, Koenig WD. 2002. Limited hybridization between Quercus lobata and Quercus douglasii (Fagaceae) in a mixed stand in central coastal California. Am J Bot 89:1792-1798.
20. Cristofolini G, Crema S. 2005. A morphometric study of the Quercus crenata species complex (Fagaceae). Bot Helv 115:155-167.
21. Goiran A. 1897. Flora Veronensis (Phanerogamae). 1. Verona, Italy: Franchini.
22. Goiran A. 1899. Stazioni veronesi di Quercus pseudosuber Santi. N Giorn Bot Ital 6:66-68.
23. González-Rodríguez A, Arias DM, Valencia S, Oyama K. 2004. Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (Fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks. Am J Bot 91:401-409.
24. González-Rodríguez A, Arias DM, Oyama K. 2005. Genetic variation and differentiation of populations within the Quercus affinis - Quercus laurina (Fagaceae) complex analyzed with RAPD markers. Can J Bot 83:155-162.
25. Goulão L, Valdiviesso T, Santana C, Moniz Oliveira C. 2001. Comparison between phenetic characterisation using RAPD and ISSR markers and phenotypic data of cultivated chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill). Genet Resour Crop Evol 48:329-338.
26. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeont Elec 4/1, 9pp. Available at: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.
27. Hardig TM, Brunsfeld SJ, Fritz RS, Morgan M, Orians C. 2000. Morphological and molecular evidence for hybridization and introgression in a willow (Salix) hybrid zone. Mol Ecol 9:9-24.
28. Hardin JW. 1975. Hybridization and introgression in Quercus alba. J Arnold Arbor 56:336-363.
29. Hill PSM, Buck P. 1980. Interspecific hybridization in a natural oak population with particular regard to introgression. Proc Okla Acad Sci 60:48-53.
30. Hou YC, Yan ZH, Wei YM, Zheng YL. 2005. Genetic diversity in barley from west China based on RAPD and ISSR analysis. Barley Genet Newsl 35:9-22.
31. Howard DJ, Preszler RW, Williams J, Fenchel S, Boecklen WJ. 1997. How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii. Evolution 51:747-755.
32. Ishida TA, Hattori K, Sato H, Kimura MT. 2003. Differentiation and hybridization between Quercus crispula and Q. dentata (Fagaceae): insights from morphological traits, amplified fragment length polymorphism markers, and leafminer composition. Am J Bot 90:769-776.
33. Jiménez P, Agúndez D, Alía R, Gil L. 1999. Genetic variation in central and marginal populations of Quercus suber L. Silvae Genet 48:278-284.
34. Jiménez P, Alía R, Gil L. 2001. Genetic variability of Quercus suber L.: applications to genetic resources conservation. In: Borelli S, Varela MC, editors. EUFORGEN Mediterranean Oaks Network, Report of the 1st Meeting, 12-14 October 2000, Antalya, Turkey. Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. pp. 15-20.
35. Kubisiak TL, Roberds JH. 2005. Genetic structure of American chestnut populations based on neutral DNA markers. In: Steiner KC, Carlson JE, editors. Restoration of American chestnut to forest lands - Proceedings of a conference and workshop, 4-6 May 2004, The North Carolina Arboretum. Natural Resources Report NPS/NCR/CUE/NRR-2006/001. Washington, USA: National Park Service.
36. Li WG, Shen JJ, Wang JB. 2005. Genetic diversity of the annual weed Monochoria vaginalis in southern China detected by random amplified polymorphic DNA and inter-simple sequence repeat analyses. Weed Res 45:424-430.
37. Magri D. 1997. Middle and Late Holocene vegetation and climate changes in peninsular Italy. In: Dalfes HN, Kukla G, Weiss H, editors. Third Millennium BC climate change and Old World collapse. NATO ASI Series I 49. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. pp. 517-530.
38. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209-220.
39. Mattioni C, Casasoli M, González M, Ipinza R, Villani F. 2002. Comparison of ISSR and RAPD markers to characterize three Chilean Nothofagus species. Theor Appl Genet 104:1064-1070.
40. Mayes SG, McGinley MA, Werth CR. 1998. Clonal population structure and genetic variation in sand-shinnery oak, Quercus havardii (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 85:1609-1617.
41. Mickevich MF. 1978. Taxonomic congruence. Syst Zool 27:143-158.
42. Mir C, Toumi L, Jarne P, Sarda V, Di Giusto F, Lumaret R. 2005. Endemic North African Quercus afares Pomel originates from hybridisation between two genetically very distant oak species (Q. suber L. and Q. canariensis Willd.): evidence from nuclear and cytoplasmic markers. Heredity 96:175-184.
43. Mort ME, Crawford DJ, Santos-Guerra A, Francisco-Ortega J, Esselman EJ, Wolfe A. 2003. Relationships among the Macaronesian members of Tolpis (Asteraceae: Lactuaceae) based upon analyses of intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Taxon 52:511-518.
44. Nardini A, Lo Gullo MA, Salleo S. 1999. Competitive strategies for water availability in two Mediterranean Quercus species. Plant Cell Environ 22:109-116.
45. Nei M, Li W. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variance in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269-5273.
46. Nkongolo KK, Michael P, Demers T. 2005. Application of ISSR, RAPD, and cytological markers to the certification of Picea mariana, P. glauca and P. engelmannii trees, and their putative hybrids. Genome 48:302-311.
47. Petit RJ, Csaikl U, Bordacs S, Burg K, Coart E, Cottrell J, et al. 2002. Chloroplast DNA variation in European white oaks. Phylogeography and patterns of diversity based on data from over 2600 populations. For Ecol Manag 156:5-26.
48. Pignatti S. 1982. Flora d'Italia. 1. Bologna, Italy: Edagricole. pp. 113-120.
49. Qian W, Ge S, Hong DY. 2001. Genetic variation within and among populations of a wild rice Oryza granulata from China detected by RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 102:440-449.
50. Rohlf FJ. 2005. NTSYSpc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2.2. Getting Starter Guide. Setauket, New York, USA: Exeter Software. p. 42.
51. Samuel R. 1999. Identification of hybrids between Quercus petraea and Q. robur (Fagaceae): results obtained with RAPD markers confirm allozyme studies based on the Got-2 locus. Plant Syst Evol 217:137-146.
52. Schrader JA, Graves WR. 2004. Systematics of Alnus maritima (Seaside Alder) resolved by ISSR polymorphisms and morphological characters. J Am Soc Hort Sci 129:231-236.
53. Schwarz O. 1993. Quercus L. In: Tutin TG, Burges NA, Chater AO, Edmondson IR, Heywood VH, Moore DM, et al., editors. Flora Europaea. 2nd ed. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 72-76.
54. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco, USA: WH Freeman. pp. 100-308.
55. Souframanien J, Gopalakrishna T. 2004. A comparative analysis of genetic diversity in blackgram genotypes using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 109:1687-1693.
56. Stone GN, Atkinson RJ, Rokas A, Csoka G, Nieves-Aldrey JL. 2001. Differential success in northwards range expansion between ecotypes of the marble gallwasp Andricus kollari: a tale of two lifecycles. Mol Ecol 10:761-778.
57. Swofford DL. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In: Miyamoto MM, Cracraft J, editors. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 295-333.
58. Swofford DL. 2000. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, USA: Sinauer Associates.
59. Tanyolac B. 2003. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and RAPD variation among wild barley (Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum) populations from west Turkey. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:611-614.
60. Tomlinson PT, Jensen RJ, Hancock JF. 2000. Do whole tree silvic characters indicate hybridization in red oak (Quercus section Lobatae)? Am Midl Nat 143:154-168.
61. Tovar-Sánchez E, Oyama K. 2004. Natural hybridization and hybrid zones between Quercus crassifolia and Quercus crassipes (Fagaceae) in Mexico: morphological and molecular evidence. Am J Bot 91:1352-1363.
62. Vijayan K. 2003. Genetic relationships of Japanese and Indian mulberry (Morus spp.) genotypes revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Plant Syst Evol 24:221-232.
63. Watano Y, Kanai A, Tani N. 2004. Genetic structure of hybrid zones between Pinus pumila and P. parviflora var. pentaphylla (Pinaceae) revealed by molecular hybrid index analysis. Am J Bot 91:65-72.
64. Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531-6535.
65. Williams JH, Boecklen WJ, Howard DJ. 2001. Reproductive processes in two oak (Quercus) contact zones with different levels of hybridization. Heredity 87:680-690.
66. Wu CI. 2001. The genetic view of the process of speciation. J Evol Biol 14:851-997.
67. Wu CJ, Cheng ZQ, Huang XQ, Yin SH, Cao KM, Sun CR. 2004. Genetic diversity among and within populations of Oryza granulata from Yunnan of China revealed by RAPD and ISSR markers: implications for conservation of the endangered species. Plant Sci 167:35-42.
68. Yakovlev IA, Kleinschmidt J. 2002. Genetic differentiation of pedunculate oak Quercus robur L. in the European part of Russia based on RAPD markers. Russ J Genet 38:207-215.
69. Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20:176-183.