Hybridization in two distantly related Mexican black oaks Quercus conzattii and Quercus eduardii (Fagaceae: Quercus: section Lobatae)

SIDA, Contributions to Botany

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 17-41

  Bacon, Jeffrey R ^a,b   Spellenberg, Richard ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD JUÁREZ DEL ESTADO DE DURANGO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUERCUS CONZATTII; QUERCUS EDUARDII;

EID: 0030512956     PISSN: 00361488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. ANDERSON, E.A. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. John Wiley and Sons. New York.
2. ANDERSON, E.A. 1953. Introgressive hybridization. Biol. Rev. 28: 280-307.
3. ANDERSON, E. and G.L. STEBBINS. 1954. Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8: 378-388.
4. ARNOLD, M.L. 1990. Allozyme variation in Louisiana irises: a test for introgression and hybrid speciation. Heredity 65: 297-306.
5. ARNOLD, M.L. 1992. Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Ann. Rev. Ecology and Syst. 23: 237-261.
6. BELLO G., M.A. and J.N. LABAT. 1987. Los encinos (Quercus) del estado de Michoacan, Mexico. Centre d'Etudes Mexicaines et Centramericaines, Mexico.
7. BENSEN, L., E.A. PHILLIPS, and P.A. WILSON. 1967. Evolutionary sorting characteristics in a hybrid swarm. I. Direction of slope. Amer. J. Bot. 54: 1017-1026.
8. BOECKLEN, W.J. and R. SPELLENBERG 1990. Structure of herbivore communities in two oak (Quercus spp.) hybrid zones. Oecologia 85: 92-100.
9. BRAY, J.R. 1960. Note on hybridization between Quercus macrocarpa and Quercus bicolor. Canad. J. Bot. 38: 701-704.
10. BROPHY, W.B. and D.R. PARNELL. 1974. Hybridization between Quercus agrifolia and Quercus wislizenii (Fagaceae). Madroño 22: 290-302.
11. BURGER, W. 1975. The species concept in Quercus. Taxon 24: 45-50.
12. CAMUS, A. 1936-1938. Les Chênes: Monographie du genre Quercus. Tome I: Genre Quercus. Sous-genre Balanopsis: Sous-genre Euquercus (Sections Cerris et Mesobalanus). In: Encyclopédie Economique de Sylviculture VI. Paul Lechevalier, Editeur, Paris, France.
13. CAMUS, A. 1938-1939- Les Chênes: Monographie du genre Quercus. Tome II: Genre Quercus. Sous-genre Euquercus (Sections Lepidobalanus et Macrobalanus). In: Encyclopédie Economique de Sylviculture VII. Paul Lechevalier, Editeur, Paris, France.
14. CAMUS, A. 1952-1954. Les Chênes: Monographie du genre Quercus. Tome III: Genre cus sous-genre Euquercus (Sections Protobalanus et Erythrobalanus): In: Encyclopédie Economique de Sylviculture VII. Paul Lechevalier, Editeur. Paris, France.
15. CERDA L., DE LA, M. 1989. Encinos de Aguascalientes. Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, México.
16. COOPERRIDER, M. 1957. Introgressive hybridization between Quercus macrocarpa and Quercus velutina in Iowa. Amer. J. Bot. 44: 804-810.
17. DATAMOST CORPORATION. 1994. StatMost for Windows: Statistical Analysis and Graphics: User's Handbook. Salt Lake City, UT.
18. DATAMOST CORPORATION. 1995. StatMost for Windows: Statistical Analysis and Graphics: Supplementary Document for Extended Version. Salt Lake City, UT.
19. DAVIS, P.H. and V.H. HEYWOOD. 1963. Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London.
20. DUPOUEY, J.L. 1989. Analyse multivariable de quelques caractères morphologiques de populationes de chênes (Quercus robur L. et Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. du Hurepoix. Ann. Sci. Forest. 40: 265-282.
21. EHRENDORFER, F. 1959. Differentiation-hybridization cycles and polyploidy in Achillea. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium. Quant. Biol. 24: 141-152.
22. ELENAROSSELLO, J.A., R. LUMARET, E. CABRERA, and H. MICHAUD. 1992. Evidence for hybridization between sympatric Holm-Oak and Cork-Oak in Spain based on diagnostic enzyme markers. Vegetatio 100: 115-118.
23. GILLETT, G.W. 1972. The role of hybridization in the evolution of the Hawaiian flora. In: Valentine, D.H. ed. Taxonomy, phytogeography, and evolution. Academic Press, New York. Pp. 205-219.
24. GONZÁLEZ E., M.S. GONZÁLEZ E., and Y. HERRERA A. 1991. Listados Florísticos de México. IX. Flora de Durango. Institute de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.
25. GONZÁLEZ V., L.M. 1986. Contribución al conocimiento del género Quercus (Fagaceae) en el estado de Jalisco: Colección Flora de Jalisco. Institute de Botánica, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara.
26. GOTTLIEB, L.D. 1972. Levels of confidence in analysis of hybridization in plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 59: 435-446.
27. GRANT, P.R. and B.R. GRANT. 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256: 193-197.
28. GRANT, P.R. and B.R. GRANT. 1994. Phenotypic and genetic effects of hybridization in Darwin's finches. Evolution 48: 297-316.
29. GRANT, V. 1981. Plant Speciation, Second Edition. Columbia University Press, New York.
30. HARDIN, J.W. 1975. Hybridization and introgression in Quercus alba. J. Arnold Arbor. 56: 336-363.
31. HARDIN, J.W. 1979. Patterns of variation in foliar trichomes of eastern North American Quercus. Amer. J. Bot. 66: 576-585.
32. HENDRICKS, A.J. 1961. Informe sobre la vegetación actual de un sitio arqueológico de la civilización Chalchiuites y de sus alredores, vecino a la Cd. de Durango, Rep. Mexicana. Bol. Soc. Bot. Mex. 26: 177-221.
33. HOLMGREN, P.K., N.H. HOLMGREN, and L.C. BENNETT. 1990. Index herbariorum: Part I: The herbaria of the world. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY.
34. JENSEN, R.J., R. DEPIERO, and B.K. SMITH. 1984. Vegetative characters, population variation, and the hybrid origin of Quercus ellipsoidalis. Amer. Midi. Naturalist. 111: 364-370.
35. JENSEN, R.J. and W.H. ESHBAUGH. 1976a. Numerical taxonomic studies of hybridization in Quercus. I. Population with areal distributions and low taxonomic diversity. Syst. Bot. 1: 1-9.
36. JENSEN, R.J. and W.H. ESHBAUGH. 1976b. Numerical taxonomic studies of hybridization in Quercus. II. Populations with wide areal distributions and high taxonomic diversity. Syst. Bot. 1: 11-19.
37. LEWONTIN, R.C. and L.C. BIRCH. 1966 Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution 20: 315-336.
38. MARTÍNEZ, M. 1951-1974. Los encinos de México y Centroamérica I-XV. Anales Inst. Biol. Univ. Nac. México.
39. MAZE, J. 1968. Past hybridization between Quercus macrocarpus and Q. gambelii. Brittonia 20: 321-333
40. MCVAUGH, R. 1974. Fagaceae. Flora Novo-Galiciana. Contr. Univ. Michigan Herb. 12: 1-93.
41. MULLER, C.H. 1951. The oaks of Texas. Contr. Texas Res. Found. 1: 21-309.
42. MULLER, C.H. 1952. Ecological control of hybridization in Quercus: a factor in the mechanism of evolution. Evolution 6: 147-161.
43. NAMKOONG, G. 1966. Statistical analysis of introgression. Biometrics 22: 488-502.
44. NASON, J.P., N.C. ELLSTRAND, and M.L. ARNOLD. 1992. Patterns of hybridization and introgression in populations of oaks, manzanitas, and irises. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 101-111.
45. NIXON, K.C. 1993. The genus Quercus in Mexico. In: Ramamoorthy, T.P., R. Bye, A. Lot, and J.Fa, eds. Biological diversity of Mexico. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Pp. 447-458.
46. OLSSON, U. 1975. A morphological analysis of phenotypes in populations of Quercus (Fagaceae) in Sweden. Bot. Not. 128: 55-68.
47. PALMER, E.J. 1948. Hybrid oaks of North America. J. Arnold Arbor. 29: 1-48.
48. PHIPPS, J.B. 1984. Problems with hybridity in the cladistics of Crataegus (Rosaceae). In: W.F. Grant, ed. Plant Biosystematics. Academic Press, London. Pp. 417-438.
49. POTTS, B.M. and J.B. REID. 1985. Analysis of a hybrid swarm between Eucalyptus risdonii Hook, f. and E. amygdalina Labill. Austral. J. Bot. 33: 543-562.
50. RADFORD, A.E., W.C. DICKSON, J.R. MASSEY, and C.R. BELL. 1974. Vascular plant systematics. Harper & Row, NY.
51. RATTENBURY, J.A. 1962. Cyclic hybridization as a survival mechanism in the New Zealand forest flora. Evolution 16: 348-363.
52. RUSHTON, B.S. 1978. Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.: a multivariate approach to the hybrid problem, 1. Data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. Watsonia 12: 81-101.
53. RUSHTON, B.S. 1979. Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.: a multivariate approach to the hybrid problem, 2. The geographical distribution of population types. Watsonia 12: 209-224.
54. RUSHTON, B.S. 1988. Pollen viability and the hybrid oak (Quercus robur L. × Q. petraea (Matt) Liebl.) controversy- In: C. Moriarty, ed. Taxonomy, Putting Plants and Animals in their Place. R. Ir. Acad., Dublin. Pp. 89-110.
55. RZEDOWSKI, J. 1978. Vegetación de México. Editorial Limusa, México.
56. SAS INSTITUTE, INC. 1992. SAS System, Release 6.07, for the VMS Environment. Cary, North Carolina.
57. SILLIMAN, F.E. and R.S. LEISNER. 1958. An analysis of a colony of hybrid oaks. Amer. J. Bot. 45: 730-736.
58. SPELLENBERG, R. 1992. A new species of black oak (Quercus, subg. Erythrobalanus, Fagaceae) from the Sierra Madre Occidental, México. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 1200-1206.
59. SPELLENBERG, R. and J.R. BACON. 1996. Taxonomy and distribution of a natural group of black oaks of Mexico (Quercus, section Lobatae, subsection Racemiflorae). Syst. Bot. 21: 85-99.
60. STANDLEY, P.C. 1920. Trees and shrubs of Mexico (Gleicheniaceae-Betulaceae). Contr. U.S. Nat. Herbarium 23: 1-1721.
61. STEBBINS, G.L., Jr. 1959. The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 103: 231-251.
62. STEBBINS, G.L., JR., E.G. MATZKE, and C. EPLING. 1947. Hybridization in a population of Quercus marilandica and Quercus ilicifolia. Evolution 1: 79-88.
63. SZMIDT, A.E., Y.A. EL-KASSABY, A. SIGURGEIRSSON, T. ALDEN, D. LINDGREN, and J.E. HALLOREN. 1988. Classifying seedlots of Picea sitchensis and P. glauca in zones of introgression using restriction analysis of chloroplast DNA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 841-845.
64. TRELEASE, W. 1924. The American oaks. Mem. Nat. Acad. Sci. 20: 1-255 + 420 pl.
65. TUCKER, J.M. 1959. A review of hybridization in North American oaks. Proc. 9th Int. Bor. Congr. 2: 404-405.
66. TUCKER, J.M. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex. I. A preliminary statement. Amer. J. Bot. 202-208.
67. TUCKER, J.M. and B.B. BOGERT. 1973. Analysis of a progeny test of a hybrid oak, Quercus gambelii Quercus turbinella. Madroño 22: 1-9.
68. VAN DEVENDER, T.R. 1986. Pleistocene climates and endemism in the Chihuahuan Desert flora. In: Barlow, J.C., A.M. Powell, and B.N. Timmermann, eds. Transactions of the Second Symposium on the Resources of the Chihuahuan Desert. Chihuahuan Desert Research Institute, Alpine, Texas. Pp. 1-19.
69. VAN DEVENDER, T.R. 1990. Late Quaternary vegetation and climate of the Chihuahuan Desert, United States and México. In: Betancourt, J.L., T.R. Van Devender, and P.S. Martin, eds. Packrat Middens: the Last 40,000 Years of Biotic Change. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Pp. 104-133.
70. VAN DEVENDER, T.R., R.S. THOMPSON, and J.L. BETANCOURT. 1987. Vegetation history of the deserts of southwestern North America; the nature and timing of the Late Wisconsin-Holocene transition. In: Ruddiman, W.F. and H.E. Wright, Jr., eds. The geology of North America, Vol. K-3, North America and adjacent oceans during the last deglaciation. The Geological Society of America. Pp. 323-352.
71. VAN VALEN, L. 1992. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. In: M. Ereshefsky, ed. The units of evolution - essays on the nature of species. Bradford Book, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Pp. 65-77.
72. WILSON, P. 1992. On inferring hybridity from morphological intermediacy. Taxon 41: 11-23.
73. WHITTEMORE, A.T. and B.A. SCHAAL. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 88: 2540-2544.
74. ZAVALA C.F. 1989. Identificación de encinos de México. Universidad Autonoma, Chapingo, México, México.