Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2007, Pages

  Schofield, Andrew J ^a   Ledgeway, Timothy ^b   Hutchinson, Claire V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aftereffect; Contrast; First order; Luminance; Motion; Orientation; Second order

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34250018283     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.8.1     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and image science, 2, 284-299.
2. Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1986). The extraction of spatio-temporal energy in human and machine vision. In Proceedings of the workshop on motion: Representation and analysis (pp. 151-156). Charleston, SC: IEEE Computer Society.
3. Ashida, H., & Osaka, N. (1994). Difference of spatial frequency selectivity between static and flicker motion aftereffects. Perception, 23, 1313-1320.
4. Baker, C. L., Jr. (1999). Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 461- 466.
5. Baker, C. L., Jr., Mortin, C. L., Prins, N., Kingdom, F. A., & Dumoulin, S. O. (2006). Visual cortex responses to different texture-defined boundaries: An fMRI study [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6 (6):209, 209, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/209/, doi:10.1167/6.6.209.
6. Benton, C. P. (2002). Gradient-based analysis of non-Fourier motion. Vision Research, 42, 2869-2877.
7. Benton, C. P. (2004). A role for contrast-normalisation in second-order motion perception. Vision Research, 44, 91-98.
8. Benton, C. P., & Johnston, A. (1997). First-order motion from contrast modulated noise? Vision Research, 37, 3073-3078.
9. Benton, C. P., & Johnston, A. (2001). A new approach to analysing texture-defined motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2435-2443.
10. Benton, C. P., Johnston, A.,McOwan, P.W., & Victor, J. D. (2001). Computational modeling of non-Fourier motion: Further evidence for a single luminance-based mechanism. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, image science, and vision, 18, 2204-2208.
11. Bex, P. J., Verstraten, F. A., & Mareschal, I. (1996). Temporal and spatial frequency tuning of the flicker motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 36, 2721-2727.
12. Blakemore, C., & Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. The Journal of Physiology, 203, 237-260.
13. Bruce, V., Green, P. R., & Georgeson, M. A. (1996). Visual perception: Physiology, psychology and ecology (3rd ed.). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Cavanagh, P., & Mather, G. (1989). Motion: The long and short of it. Spatial Vision, 4, 103-129.
15. Chubb, C., & Sperling, G. (1988). Drift-balanced random stimuli: A general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and image science, 5, 1986-2007.
16. Cruickshank, A. G. (2006). Supra-threshold interactions between second-order cues: Modulations in contrast, orientation and binocular disparity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, UK.
17. Cruickshank, A. G., & Schofield, A. J. (2005). Transfer of tilt after-effects between second-order cues. Spatial Vision, 18, 379-397.
18. Culham, J. C., Nishida, S., Ledgeway, T., Cavanagh, P., von Grunau, M. W., Kwas, M., et al. (1998). Higher order effects. In G. Mather, F. Verstraten, & S. Anstis (Eds.), The motion after-effect: A modern perspective (pp. 85-124). Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Derrington, A. M., & Badcock, D. R. (1985). Separate detectors for simple and complex grating patterns? Vision Research, 25, 1869-1878.
20. Fleet, D. J., & Langley, K. (1994). Computational analysis of non-Fourier motion. Vision Research, 34, 3057-3079.
21. Georgeson, M. A., & Schofield, A. J. (2002). Shading and texture: Separate information channels with a common adaptation mechanism? Spatial Vision, 16, 59-76.
22. Gibson, J. J., & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 453-467.
23. Gray, R., & Regan, D. (1998). Spatial frequency discrimination and detection characteristics for gratings defined by orientation texture. Vision Research, 38, 2601-2617.
24. von Grunau, M. (1986). A motion aftereffect for longrange stroboscopic apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 31-38.
25. Gurnsey, R., Fleet, D., & Potechin, C. (1998). Secondorder motions contribute to vection. Vision Research, 38, 2801-2816.
26. Hutchinson, C. V., & Ledgeway, T. (2006). Sensitivity to spatial and temporal modulations of first-order and second-order motion. Vision Research, 46, 324-335.
27. Johnston, A., McOwan, P. W., & Benton, C. P. (1999). Robust velocity computation from a biologically motivated model of motion perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 266, 509-518.
28. Johnston, A., McOwan, P. W., & Buxton, H. (1992). A computational model of the analysis of some firstorder and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 250, 297-306.
29. Kingdom, F. A., Keeble, D., & Moulden, B. (1995). Sensitivity to orientation modulation in micropattern-based textures. Vision Research, 35, 79-91.
30. Kingdom, F. A., Prins, N., & Hayes, A. (2003). Mechanism independence for texture-modulation detection is consistent with a filter-rectify-filter mechanism. Visual Neuroscience, 20, 65-76.
31. Klein, S. A., Hu, Q. J., & Carney, T. (1996). The adjacent pixel nonlinearity: Problems and solutions. Vision Research, 36, 3167-3181.
32. Landy, M. S., & Bergen, J. R. (1991). Texture segregation and orientation gradient. Vision Research, 31, 679- 691.
33. Ledgeway, T. (1994). Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli. Vision Research, 34, 2879-2889.
34. Ledgeway, T., & Hutchinson, C. V. (2006). Is the direction of second-order, contrast-defined motion patterns visible to standard motion-energy detectors: A model answer? Vision Research, 46, 556-567.
35. Ledgeway, T., & Smith, A. T. (1994a). Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- order and second-order motion in human vision. Vision Research, 34, 2727-2740.
36. Ledgeway, T., & Smith, A. T. (1994b). The duration of the motion aftereffect following adaptation to firstorder and second-order motion. Perception, 23, 1211-1219.
37. Levinson, E., & Sekuler, R. (1975). The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement. The Journal of Physiology, 250, 347-366.
38. Lu, Z. L., & Sperling, G. (1995). The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Research, 35, 2697-2722.
39. Lu, Z. L., & Sperling, G. (2001). Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: Review and update. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, image science, and vision, 18, 2331-2370.
40. Lu, Z. L., Sperling, G., & Beck, J. R. (1997). Selective adaptation of three motion systems. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 38, 1105.
41. Mareschal, I., Ashida, H., Bex, P. J., Nishida, S., & Verstraten, F. A. (1997). Linking lower and higher stages of motion processing? Vision Research, 37, 1755-1759.
42. Nishida, S., Ledgeway, T., & Edwards, M. (1997). Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system. Vision Research, 37, 2685-2698.
43. Nishida, S., & Sato, T. (1995). Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Vision Research, 35, 477-490.
44. Schofield, A. J., & Georgeson, M. A. (1999). Sensitivity to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual white noise: Separate mechanisms with similar behaviour. Vision Research, 39, 2697-2716.
45. Schofield, A. J., & Georgeson, M. A. (2003). Sensitivity to contrast modulation: The spatial frequency dependence of second-order vision. Vision Research, 43, 243-259.
46. Schofield, A. J., Ledgeway, T., & Hutchinson, C. V. (2006). Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first-order and second-order cues. Perception, 35, 238.
47. Schofield, A. J., & Yates, T. A. (2005). Interactions between orientation and contrast modulations suggest limited cross-cue linkage. Perception, 34, 769-792.
48. Smith, A. T. (1994). The detection of second-order motion. In A. T. Smith & R. J. Snowden (Eds.), Visual detection of motion (pp. 145-176). London: Academic Press.
49. Smith, A. T., & Ledgeway, T. (1997). Separate detection of moving luminance and contrast modulations: Fact or artifact? Vision Research, 37, 45-62.
50. Sperling, G., & Lu, Z.-L. (1998). A systems analysis of visual motion perception. In T. Watanabe (Ed.), High-level motion processing (pp. 153-183). London: MIT Press.
51. Weibull, W. (1951). A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 18, 292-297.
52. Wilson, H. R., Ferrera, V. P., & Yo, C. (1992). A psychophysically motivated model for 2-dimensional motion perception. Visual Neuroscience, 9, 79-97.
53. Wohlgemuth, A. (1911). On the aftereffect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology: Monograph Supplements, 1, 1-117.