First-order motion from contrast modulated noise?

Vision Research

Volumn 37, Issue 22, 1997, Pages 3073-3078

  Benton, C P ^a   Johnston, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contrast modulated noise; Energy model; First order; Microbalanced; Second order

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTRAST; ENERGY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; LUMINANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 0030728168     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00174-0     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Adelson, E. H. & Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatio-temporal energy models for the perception of apparent motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 284-299.
2. Adelson, E. H. & Bergen, J. R. (1986). The extraction of spatiotemporal energy in human and machine vision. In Motion: representation and analysis (IEEE workshop proceedings), pp. 151-155.
3. Cavanagh, P. & Mather, G. (1989). Motion: the long and the short of it. Spatial Vision, 4, 103-129.
4. Chubb, C. & Sperling, G. (1988). Drift-balanced random dot stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5, 1986-2007.
5. van Santen, J. P. H. & Sperling, G. (1984). Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1, 451-473.
6. Smith, A. T. & Ledgeway, T. (1997). Separate detection of moving luminance and contrast modulations: fact or artifact? Vision Research, 37, 45-62.
7. Watson, A. B. & Ahumada, A. J. Jr (1983) A look at motion in the frequency domain. In Tosotos, I. K. (Ed.), Motion: perception and representation (pp. 1-10). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.