Shading and texture: Separate information channels with a common adaptation mechanism?

Spatial Vision

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 59-76

  Georgeson, Mark A ^a,b   Schofield, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Contrast; Detection; Luminance; Modulation; Shading; Texture; Tilt aftereffect; Vision

Indexed keywords

DIFFRACTION GRATINGS; LIGHT MODULATION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; TEXTURES;

TILT AFTEREFFECT;

VISION;

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0036984510     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/15685680260433913     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Berkley, M. A., Debruyn, B. and Orban, G. A. (1994). Illusory, motion, and luminance-defined contours interact in the human visual-system, Vision Research 34, 209-216.
2. Blakemore, C., Muncey, J. P. J. and Ridley, R. M. (1973). Stimulus specificity in the human visual system, Vision Research 13, 1915-1931.
3. Bruce, V., Green, P. R. and Georgeson, M. A. (1996). Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology, 3rd edn. Psychology Press, Hove, UK.
4. Chubb, C. and Sperling, G. (1988). Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 5, 1986-2006.
5. Georgeson, M. A. (1985). The effect of spatial adaptation on perceived contrast, Spatial Vision 1, 103-112.
6. Georgeson, M. A. (2000). Different contrast response functions underlying contrast adaptation and the tilt aftereffect, Perception (Suppl.) 29, 115.
7. Gibson, J. J. and Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, aftereffect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies, J. Exper. Psychol. 20, 453-467.
8. Graham, N. V. S. (1989). Visual Pattern Analyzers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Langley, K., Fleet, D. J. and Hibbard, P. B. (1999). Stereopsis from contrast envelopes, Vision Research 39, 2313-2324.
10. Ledgeway, T. and Smith, A. T. (1994). Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first-and second-order motion in human vision, Vision Research 34, 2727-2740.
11. Lu, Z.-L. and Sperling, G. (1995). The functional architecture of human visual motion perception, Vision Research 35, 2697-2722.
12. Nishida, S. and Sato, T. (1995). Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing, Vision Research 35, 477-490.
13. Nishida, S., Ledgeway, T. and Edwards, M. (1997). Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system, Vision Research 37, 2685-2698.
14. Paradiso, M. A., Shimojo, S. and Nakayama, K. (1989). Subjective contours, tilt aftereffects, and visual cortical organization, Vision Research 29, 1205-1213.
15. Parker, D. M. (1972). Contrast and size variables and the tilt aftereffect, Quart. J. Exper. Psychol. 24, 1-7.
16. Regan, D. (2000). Human Perception of Objects. Sinaner Associates Inc., Sunderland MA, USA.
17. Ross, J. and Speed, H. D. (1996). Perceived contrast following adaptation to gratings of different orientations, Vision Research 36, 1811-1818.
18. Schofield, A. J. and Georgeson, M. A. (1999). Sensitivity to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual white noise: separate mechanisms with similar behaviour, Vision Research 39, 2697-2716.
19. Scott-Samuel, N. E. and Georgeson, M. A. (1999). Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion? Vision Research 39, 2853-2865.
20. Smith, A. T. and Over, R. (1975). Tilt aftereffects with subjective contours, Nature 257, 581-582.
21. Snowden, R. J. (1991). Measurement of visual channels by contrast adaptation, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 246, 53-59.
22. Snowden, R. J. and Hammett, S. T. (1992). Subtractive and divisive adaptation in the human visual system, Nature 355, 248-250.
23. Snowden, R. J. and Hammett, S. T. (1996). Spatial frequency adaptation: threshold elevation and perceived contrast, Vision Research 36, 1797-1809.
24. Solomon, J. A. and Sperling, G. (1994). Full-wave and half-wave rectification in second-order motion perception, Vision Research 34, 2239-2257.
25. Sperling, G., Chubb, C., Solomon, J. A. and Lu, Z.-L. (1994). Full-wave and half-wave processes in second-order motion and texture, in: Higher-order Processing in the Visual System (Ciba Foundation symposium 184), Bock, G. R. and Goode, J. A. (Eds), pp. 287-308. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
26. Watson, A. B. and Robson, J. G. (1981). Discrimination at threshold: labelled detectors in human vision, Vision Research 21, 1115-1122.
27. Wilson, H. R. (1994). Models of two-dimensional motion perception, in: Visual Detection of Motion, Smith, A. T. and Snowden, R. J. (Eds), pp. 219-251. Academic Press, London.
28. Wilson, H. R., Ferrera, V. P. and Yo, C. (1992). A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception, Visual Neuroscience 9, 79-97.
29. Zhou, Y. X. and Baker, C. L. (1993). A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses, Science 261, 98-101.
30. Zhou, Y. X. and Baker, C. L. (1996). Spatial properties of envelope-responsive cells in area-17 and area-18 neurons of the cat, J. Neurophysiol. 75, 1038-1050.