Evaluation of TEAM Leafy Spurge project

Rangeland Ecology and Management

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 483-493

  Hodur, Nancy M ^a   Leistritz, F Larry ^a   Bangsund, Dean A ^a  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biocontrol; IPM (integrated pest management); Noxious weeds; Rancher opinion; Survey; Weed management

Indexed keywords

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SURVEY; WEED;

ANIMALIA; EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIA ESULA;

EID: 33749984765     PISSN: 15507424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2111/05-203R.1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BANGSUND, D. A., F. L. LEISTRITZ, AND J. A. LEITCH. 1999. Assessing economic impacts of biological control of weeds: the case of leafy spurge in the northern Great Plains of the United States. Journal of Environmental Management 56:35-43.
2. BANGSUND, D. A., D. J. NUDELL, R. S. SELL, AND F. L. LEISTRITZ. 2001. Economic analysis of controlling leafy spurge with sheep. Journal of Range Management 54:322-329.
3. COPPOCK, D. L., AND A. H. BIRKENFELD. 1999. Use of livestock and range management practices in Utah. Journal of Range Management 52:7-18.
4. DIDIER, E. A., AND M. W. BRUNSON. 2004. Adoption of range management innovations by Utah ranchers. Journal of Range Management 57:330-336.
5. FERNANDEZ-GIMENEZ, M. E., G. RUYLE, AND S. J. MCCLARAN. 2005. An evaluation of Arizona Cooperative Extension's Rangeland Monitoring Program. Rangeland Ecology & Management 58:89-98.
6. HODUR, N. M., F. L. LEISTRITZ, AND D. A. BANGSUND. 2002a. Ranch operators' perceptions of leafy spurge management and evaluation of the TEAM Leafy Spurge Project. Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report No. 493. Fargo, ND: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University. Available at: http://agecon.lib.umn.edu. Accessed 25 July 2006.
7. HODUR, N. M., F. L. LEISTRITZ, AND D. A. BANGSUND. 2002b. Perceptions of leafy spurge and evaluation of the TEAM Leafy Spurge Project by public land managers, local decision makers, and ranch operators. Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report No. 499. Fargo, ND: Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University. Available at: http://agecon.lib.umn. edu. Accessed 25 July 2006.
8. KREUTER, U. P., H. E. AMESTOY, D. N. UECKERT, AND W. A. MCGINTY. 2001. Adoption of brush busters: results of Texas County extension survey. Journal of Range Management 54:630-639.
9. LE, C. T. 1948. Applied categorical data analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. 287 p.
10. LEISTRITZ, F. L., D. A. BANGSUND, AND N. M. HODUR. 2004. Assessing the economic impact of invasive weeds: the case of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Technology 18:1392-1395.
11. LYM, R. G. 2005. Integration of biological control agents with other weed management technologies: success from the leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) IPM program. Biological Control 35:366-375.
12. LYM, R. G., AND C. G. MESSERSMITH. 1994. A decade of herbicide treatments controlled leafy spurge. North Dakota Farm Research 50:9-12.
13. LYM, R. G., K. K. SEDIVIC, AND D. R. KIRBY. 1997. Leafy spurge control with angora goats and herbicides. Journal of Range Management 50:123-128.
14. LYM, R. G., AND R. K. ZOLLINGER. 1995. Integrated management of leafy spurge. Extension Publication W-866. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University Extension Service. 7 p.
15. PETERSON, R., AND D. L. COPPOCK. 2001. Economics and demographics constrain investment in Utah private grazing lands. Journal of Range Management 54:106-114.
16. ROWAN, R. C., AND L. D. WHITE. 1994. Regional differences among Texas rangeland operators. Journal of Range Management 47:338-343.
17. SAS INSTITUTE, INC. 2004. SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
18. SCHMIDT, C. H. 1998. Leafy spurge news. XXI (3). Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University Extension Service. 8 p.
19. SELL, R. S., D. A. BANGSUND, F. L. LEISTRITZ, AND D. NUDELL. 1998a. Ranch operators' perceptions of leafy spurge. Agricultural Economics Report No. 400. Fargo, ND: Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University. Available at: http://agecon.lib.umn.edu. Accessed 25 July 2006.
20. SELL, R. S., D. A. BANGSUND, F. L. LEISTRITZ, AND D. NUDELL. 1998b. Perceptions of leafy spurge by public land managers, local decision makers, and ranch operators. Agricultural Economics Report No. 406. Fargo, ND: Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University. Available at: http://agecon.lib.umn.edu. Accessed 25 July 2006.
21. SELL, R. S., D. A. BANGSUND, AND F. L. LEISTRITZ. 1999a. Perceptions of leafy spurge by ranch operators and local decision makers: an update. Agricultural Economics Statistical Series Report No. 56. Fargo, ND: Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University. Available at: http://agecon.lib.umn.edu. Accessed 25 July 2006.
22. SELL, R. S., D. A. BANGSUND, AND F. L. LEISTRITZ. 1999b. Euphorbia esula: perceptions by ranchers and land managers. Weed Science 47:740-749.
23. SELL, R. S., D. A. BANGSUND, AND F. L. LEISTRITZ. 2000. Impediments to controlling leafy spurge in the northern Great Plains. Agricultural Economics Miscellaneous Report No. 185. Fargo, ND: Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University. Available at: http://agecon.lib.umn.edu. Accessed 25 July 2006.