Unlocking the value of RFID

Production and Operations Management

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 40-64

  Lee, Hau ^a   Özer, Özalp ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Inventory management; Radio frequency identification; Supply chain management; Value of information technology; Value of visibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249734716     PISSN: 10591478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00165.x     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Abell, P., C. Quirk. 2003. ePC/RFID and its imminent effect on the supply chain. AMR Research Report, September 30.
2. Alexander, K., T. Gilliam, K. Gramling, C. Grubelic, H. Kleinberger, S. Leng, D. Moogimane, C. Sheedy. 2002. Applying auto-ID to reduce losses associated with shrink. IBM Business Consulting Services, MIT Auto-ID Center White Paper, November 1.
3. A. T. Kearney. 2003. Meeting the retail RFID mandate - A discussion of the issues facing CPG companies. November.
4. A. T. Kearney, 2004. RFID/EPC: Managing the transition (2004-2007).
5. Atali, A., H. Lee, Ö. Özer. 2004. Inventory control under imperfect information: Bounds, heuristics and approximations with demand prioritization. Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
6. Atali, A., H. Lee, Ö. Özer. 2006. If the inventory manager knew: Value of visibility and RFID under imperfect inventory information. Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
7. Bensoussan, A., M. Cakanyildirim, S. Sethi. 2005. Optimal ordering policies for inventory problems with dynamic information delays. Working Paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Texas.
8. Booth-Thomas, C. 2003. The see-it-all chip. Time Magazine, September 14.
9. Cachon, G. 2003. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Ch. 6 in Graves and Kok (2003).
10. Cachon, G. P., M. Fisher. 2000. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Science 46(8) 1032-1048.
11. Cachon, G., M. Lariviere. 2001. Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Science 47(5) 629-646.
12. Camdereli, A. Z., J. M. Swaminathan. 2005. Coordination of a supply chain under misplaced inventory. Working Paper, UNC Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
13. Carter, J. R. 1990. The dollars and sense of electronic data interchange. Production and Inventory Management Journal 31(2) 22-26.
14. Chappell, G., D. Durdan, G. Gilbert, L. Ginsberg, J. Smith, J. Tobolski. 2002a. Auto-ID in the box: The value of auto-ID technology in retail stores. Accenture, MIT Auto-ID Center White Paper, June 1.
15. Chappell, G., D. Durdan, G. Gilberg, L. Ginsberg, J. Smith, J. Tobolski. 2002b. Auto-ID on delivery: The value of auto-ID technology in the retail supply chain. Accenture, MIT Auto-ID Center White Paper, November 1.
16. Chen, F. 2003. Information sharing and supply chain coordination. Ch 7 in Graves and Kok (2003).
17. Chen, F. 1999. Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays. Management Science 45(9) 1076-1090.
18. Chen, F., B. Yu. 2005. Quantifying the value of leadtime information in a single-location inventory system. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 7 144-151.
19. Cheung, K. L., H. L. Lee. 2002. The inventory benefit of shipment coordination and stock rebalancing in a supply chain. Management Science 48(2) 300-306.
20. Clark, R. 2004. RFID forecast updated after all those mandates. Using RFID.com, March 16.
21. Clark, R. 2004. Inventory tops RFID benefits list in web-based pool. Using RFID.com, September 16.
22. Clark, T. H., J. H. Hammond. 1998. Re-engineering channel reordering processes to improve total supply-chain performance in Global Supply Chain and Technology Management, H. L. Lee, S. M. Ng (eds.). POMS Series in Technology and Operations Management, 112-129.
23. Cohen, M. T. Ho, J. Z. Ren, C. Terwiesch. 2003. Measuring imputed costs in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Management Science 49(12) 1653-1670.
24. Corsten, D., T. Gruen. 2003. On-shelf-availability: The next battle-field for retail competition. Working Paper, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland.
25. Cuneo, E. C. 2003. Safe at sea. Information Week, April 7.
26. Economist. 2003. The best thing since the bar-code. Feb 6.
27. Eckerson, W. 1990. EDI efforts progress slowly in US firms. Network World 7(24) 23-24.
28. ECR Europe. 2003. Shrinkage: A collaborative approach to reducing stock loss in the supply chain.
29. Fleisch, E., C. Tellkamp. 2005. Inventory inaccuracy and supply chain performance: A simulation study of a retail supply chain. Int. J. of Production Economics 95(3) 373-385.
30. Gallego, G., Ö. Özer. 2001a. Optimal use of demand information in supply chain management in Supply Chain Structures, J. Song, D. Yao (eds.) Ch 5, 119-160.
31. Gallego, G., Ö. Özer. 2001b. Integrating replenishment decisions with advance demand information. Management Science 47(10) 1344-1360.
32. Gaukler, G., Ö. Özer, W. H. Hausman. 2004. RFID and product progress information: Improved dynamic emergency ordering policies. Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
33. Gaukler, G., R. Seifert, W. H. Hausman. 2003. Item-level RFID in the retail supply chain. Production and Operations Management 16(2) 65-76.
34. Gavirneni, S., R. Kapuchinski, S. Tayur. 1999. Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Management Science 45(1) 16-24.
35. Gozycki, M., E. Johnson, H. Lee. 2004. Woolworths chips away at inventory shrinkage through RFID initiative. Dartmouth College and Stanford Global Supply Chain Management Forum Case #6-0020.
36. Graves, S., T. de Kok (eds.). 2003. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 11: Supply chain management: Design, coordination, and operation. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
37. Grocery Manufacturers of America. 2004. A balanced perspective: EPC/RFID implementation in the CPG industry.
38. Hadley, G., T. M. Whitin. 1963. Analysis of inventory systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
39. Hardgrave, B. C., M. Waller, R. Miller. 2005. Does RFID reduce out of stock? A preliminary analysis, Working Paper. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
40. Heese, S. 2006. Inventory record inaccuracy, double marginalization and RFID adoption, Working Paper. Indiana University.
41. Iglehart, D. L., R. C. Morey, 1972. Inventory systems with imperfect asset information. Management Science 18 B388-B394.
42. Johnson, J. R. 2005. METRO reduces out of stocks with RFID; Is Wal-Mart next? DC Velocity, August 3.
43. Kang, Y., S. B. Gershwin. 2005. Information inaccuracy in inventory systems - stock loss and stockout. IIE Transactions 37 843-859.
44. Karaer, O., H. L. Lee. 2005. Managing return process with RFID-enabled negative demand information, Production and Operations Management (to appear).
45. Kinley, J. D. 2004. RFID ROI. Master of Engineering in Logistics Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts. June.
46. Kinsella, B. 2003. The Wal-Mart factor. Industrial Engineer 32-36, November.
47. Kök, A. G., K. H. Shang. 2004. Replenishment and inspection policies for systems with inventory record inaccuracy, Working Paper. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
48. Kurt Salmon Associates Inc. 1993. Efficient consumer response: Enhancing consumer value in the grocery industry. Food Marketing Institute, Washington D.C.
49. Lacy, S. 2005. RFID: Plenty of mixed signals. Business Week Online, January 31.
50. Lee, H., B. Peleg, P. Rajwat, S. Sarma, B. Subirana. 2005. Assessing the value of RFID technology and the EPC standard for manufacturers. EPCGlobal White Paper.
51. Lee, H. L., S. Whang. 2005. Higher supply chain security at lower cost: Lessons from total quality management. Int. J. of Production Economics 96 289-301.
52. Lee, H. L., R. So, C. S. Tang. 2000. Value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science 46(5) 626-643.
53. Lundstrom, S. 2003. RFID will be bigger than Y2K. AMR Research Report, July 31.
54. Lutze, H., Ö. Özer. 2003. Multi-product manufacturing and market segmentation with advance demand information. Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
55. Lutze, H., Ö. Özer. 2004. Promised lead time contracts under asymmetric information. Operations Research (to appear).
56. McHugh, M., P. Damas, 2002. Mega-port groups back security pilot. American Shipper, 14-18, September.
57. McKinsey Quarterly. 2003. Why retail wants radio tags. McKinsey Quarterly Chart Focus, September.
58. METRO Group. 2004. RFID: Benefits for retailers and suppliers through effective deployment and roll-out.
59. Moinzadeh, K. 2002. A multi-echelon inventory system with information exchange. Management Science 48(3) 414-426.
60. Moinzadeh, M. 2004. A supply chain model with reverse information exchange. Working Paper. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
61. Moinzadeh, M., S. Nahmias. 1988. A continuous review model for an inventory model with two supply modes. Management Science 34(6) 761-773.
62. Mukhopadhyay, T., S. Kekre, S. Kalathur. 1995. Business value of information technology: A study of EDI. MIS Quarterly 19(2) 137-155.
63. Niemeyer, A., M. Pak, S. Ramaswamy. 2003. Smart tags for your supply chain. McKinsey Quarterly, No. 4.
64. Özer, Ö. 2003. Replenishment strategies for distribution systems under advance demand information. Management Science 49(3) 255-272.
65. Özer, Ö. 2004. Capacity and quality risk in decentralized supply chains. The Supply Chain Connection, Vol 10, Issue 4.
66. Özer, Ö., W. Wei. 2006. Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Science 52(8), 1238-1257.
67. Pisello, T. 2004. The three Rs of RFID: Rewards, risk and ROI. Technology-Evaluation.com, September 28.
68. Raghunathan, S. 2001. Information sharing in a supply chain: A note on its value when demand is nonstationary. Management Science 47(4) 605-610, 2001.
69. Raman, A., N. Deoratius, Z. Ton. 2001a. Execution: The missing link in retail operations. California Management Review 43(3) 136-152.
70. Raman, A., N. Deoratius, Z. Ton. 2001b. The achilles' heel of supply chain management. Harvard Business Review, 2-3, May.
71. Raman, A., Z. Ton. 2004. An empirical analysis of magnitude and drivers of misplaced SKUs in retail stores. Working Paper. Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts.
72. Rekik, Y., E. Sahin, Y. Dallery. 2006. Analysis of the benefits of auto-ID technology in improving retail shelf availability. Working Paper, Ecole Centrale Paris, Paris, France.
73. Riggins, F. J., T. Mukhopadhyay. 1994. Interdependent benefits from inter-organizational systems: Opportunities for business partner reengineering. J. of Management Information Systems 11(2) 37-57.
74. Rinehart, R. F. 1960. Effects and causes of discrepancies in supply operations. Operations Research 8(4) 543-564.
75. Rutner, S., M. A. Waller, J. T. Mentzer. 2004. A practical look at RFID. Supply Chain Management Review, January/February, 36-41.
76. SAP. 2003. SAP auto-ID infrastructure. SAP White Paper.
77. Silver, E., D. Pyke, R. Peterson. 1998. Inventory management and production planning and scheduling, third edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
78. Song, J., P. Zipkin. 1996. Inventory control with information about supply condition. Management Science 42 1409-1419.
79. Subirana, B., C. Eckes, G. Herman, S. Sarma, M. Barret. 2003. Measuring the impact of information technology on value and productivity using a process-based approach: The case for RFID technologies, Working Paper. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
80. Veinott, A., W. Wagner, 1965. Computing optimal (s, S) inventory policies. Management Science 11(5) 525-552.
81. Wallace, B. 1988. Suppliers slow to profit from EDI. Network World 5(6) 1-8.
82. Wilson, T. J., G. Hafer. 2003. APEC STAR-BEST project-cost-benefit analysis. BearingPoint Report, November.
83. Yano C. A., H. L. Lee. 1995. Lot-sizing and random yields: A review. Operations Research 43(3) 311-334.
84. Zipkin, P. H. 2000. Foundations of inventory management. McGraw Hill, Boston, Massachusetts.